Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nice! Good to see especially with the difficulty (or impossibility) of getting storage upgraded after purchase of many Apple products.

Glad to see the Fusion drives were kept otherwise its impossible to get large storage without paying crazy prices.

I despise the Fusion drives.

The simple truth is it's not necessary for them to exist. Flash memory is cheap enough now that Apple can provide these storage amounts with pure SSD and still make decent profit on it.
 
Nice. I definitely wanted a 1T SSD when I'm ready to order my next iMac. Every little price reduction helps. No more spinning boot drives for me.
 
Apple typically uses MLC; you have to compare it to the Samsung 960 PRO, which is 1 TB for $329.

Also compare it to PC makers: Lenovo sells you a 1 TB Samsung 960 EVO OEM version (PM961) for a $615 upgrade. So Apple is cheaper and better than PC makers.

It's not that I don't believe you, but I'd like to know where can I check if the memory Apple uses is SLC, MLC, TLC or QLC.

Mainly because Apple doesn't give you the option of disc replacement on most of the computers where the storage chips are soldered on the mother board. And I am one of those who can hold a computer for 10 years or more.
 
NAND prices have tanked in the last 8 months - even Apple had to recognise that .... good news
 
  • Like
Reactions: zubikov
Now, this is an article that could use a small table with old/new prices for these updates…
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mactendo
They still are a great thing. Most the time they feel like an SSD. Now to be fair Apple should not sell the 1TB with 32GB SSD version. They all should have the 128GB SSD like the 2TB Fusion. But I just checked prices and the 2TB Fusion is still $700 cheaper than 2TB SSD which is not insignificant to most. And you can’t even get more than 1TB SSD unless you get the top iMac. So if someone needs that storage it’s a great way to go. Me personally, I went with 512GB SSD and added a 6TB external.

i thought it was nice. if they offered it in macbooks i would've jumped on that years ago!
 
It's not that I don't believe you, but I'd like to know where can I check if the memory Apple uses is SLC, MLC, TLC or QLC.

Take it apart and read the chips, that's the most reliable method. Or look at a teardown, though there may be supply variations. A rough way is to compare the performance against contemporaneous SSDs. Apple seems to use a lot of Samsung, you can tell from the firmware versions, and the speeds match the PRO models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus
The design guys don’t set the prices, this has nothing to do with Ive.

That’s what I said in the first comment.

And we’ll still be seeing new Ive-approved designs for the next couple years, even if he and his new company never does anything with Apple.

After reading that report describing how Ive missed meetings, worked outside of Apple and how couldn’t provide feedback when designers needed it on the iPhone X, it looks as at best the designs were “approved” but were not his direct creation. He basically retired some time ago.

Nah. The prices Apple pays fluctuate. When prices get cheaper Apple can offer cheaper upgrade options.

Prices don’t drop $200 in a day. Apple always had a very big margin on memory upgrades.

Why not? Is this “something” a good thing?
He’s a designer who is not in charge of memory upgrade prices. If it’s somehow linked to him then very indirectly trough structural changes inside Apple.
So far it seems to be a good thing. Price cuts, silently upgraded Macs, talks about redesigned MacBook keyboard...
 
Prices still are quite inflated, but finally more reasonable.

Fusion Drive should've been dropped entirely as well.
Prices still are quite inflated, but finally more reasonable.

Fusion Drive should've been dropped entirely as well.

And why would they remove Fusion Drives? I agree that they should never come as the default option. But NVMe/PCI-Express SSD's are expensive when it comes to price per GB/TB. Some users needs a lot of storage, and for many it's just not cost-effective to store large files and libraries on SSD storage due to this pris per GB/TB.

Apple's Fusion Drivers are really great when it comes to using the SSD storage as cache for the hard drive. So for many people that requires large amount of space it would be much better to have a Apple Fusion drive with 256/512GB SSD + 2 TB++ HDD and have macOS handle the caching.

I see no reason for Apple to get rid of it. But it should become more flexible in-terms of configuration, let the user decide how much SSD cache storage and how much HDD storage they want in their Fusion Drive.
 
Still way too expensive and pounds still staying firmly in my pocket. 2007 iMac creeps on for a bit longer. Message me when you've stopped taking the piss out of the customers, Tim.
 
With Apple's buying power, pass that saving to the customer. Make Apple products a better value for everybody, regardless of income and sales will follow. Good deal - lower the price of everything!
 
This still seems pretty crazy - 1TB Samsung EVO NVM retails at $169.
Indeed but don't forget the employee paid to unpack the ssd, wield it to the motherboard manually and close the computer... That's hand made craftsmanship... It's normal it cost $$$ ;)
 
Curious if they believe this will improve sales figures. A small change here may increase sales enough to not warrant any other price drops though... may just be my opinion, but it always seems to be more of a testing the waters change like this to see what consumers do.

Will be interesting to see if we see any changes around pricing for iPads and their storage options (or any other product - general pricing strategy).
 
Interesting... all the upgrades after 500GB for the 15" i7 MacBook Pro are the same cost as 256GB in the Military/Veterans Store. The i9 lists them all as no additional cost. In fact, all MacBook Air and Pro Models listed does this. Must be an error.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.