Why? Tim is following the guidance. Major companies are starting a return to office. While the pandemic isn’t over, not by a long shot, there is a push to balance safety with return to normalcy.Too soon Tim, mid-winter is too soon.
Why? Tim is following the guidance. Major companies are starting a return to office. While the pandemic isn’t over, not by a long shot, there is a push to balance safety with return to normalcy.Too soon Tim, mid-winter is too soon.
The company I work for does this. We have about 80 employees and only one is working in the office (and that is because his wife works from home and their condo isn't big enough for two home offices). We shut down 3 of our 4 office locations and have one small office now with a conference room that sits almost empty all the time. We are recruiting and only looking for remote employees now.I don't like the all-or-nothing approach of work from home vs. office thing. If I had my way, I'd let the people who want to work from home do that, and those who want to work in the office do that. If it's a team-based thing, there are many video conferencing solutions like Google's Jamboard or Neat bars. Sure, they're expensive, but Apple definitely has the resources to invest in them.
You must be new. I have had FAR GREATER issues while Apple workers were in the office years ago than the last two years.Apple’s software quality the last 2 years tells me all I need to know about whether in person collaboration is valuable. Return to office can’t happen soon enough for Apple.
That’s not entirely true. I applied for a remote work position at Apple years ago. They do support remote work.I am not saying WFH won’t work. It can, but mainly for companies built and designed to thrive on it. Apple is a company built on close collaboration between all the respective departments in order to achieve the tight integration it’s famed for. And I still believe the best meetings happen when everyone is in the same room butting heads and hashing out ideas.
I feel that it is simply not in Apple’s best interests to offer WFH as a permanent option for its employees, simply because this is not what powers its design-led process. The causality will be worse products to show for it (and I think we are already starting to see problems crop up with ios 15 and Monterey, though I can’t say for certain of it’s due to WFH realities creeping in.
And if we say that the best employees will leave because of it, than I feel that it is a risk Apple is going to have to be willing to take, because an average worker at campus may still be able to contribute more effectively than an experienced engineer conferencing from home half way across the globe.
To the people able to WFH on a permanent basis and have better work-life balance because of it, I am happy for them and wish them all the best. I just don’t think this arrangement is going to work for Apple,
Been here longer than you.You must be new. I have had FAR GREATER issues while Apple workers were in the office years ago than the last two years.
My guess is that it has nothing to do with product design?That’s not entirely true. I applied for a remote work position at Apple years ago. They do support remote work.
Yep we are seeing things all over the US. Things have essentially “opened up” to the point where I am able to get jobs in any state now way more easily than before.Demonstrably after almost 2 years, forcing people back to offices like this is not necessary. I'm seeing it in my workplace too - we're losing staff to recruiters who sell "100% remote" as a benefit... A ping-pong table in the office with a depersonalized workspace isn't enough anymore - what are we asking people to come back to?
And every single person at Apple Campus is all product design?My guess is that it has nothing to do with product design?
So Snow Leopard, Lion, Yosemite, Mojave, and Catalina issues are all due to work from home right?Been here longer than you.
And the housing market in Idaho collapses in 3...2...1...
In my personal experience, collaboration is vastly overrated. Collaboration often means 3-4 useless people hanging out with 1-2 people doing the actual work.Sure, the openness helps with collaboration, but it also hinders focus.
If only Apple knew a hard- and software engineering company with some experience in messaging systems that could help them develop a bespoke solution...
False. You’ve clearly never worked in an environment with high level trade secrets and/or “top secret” level information.Nonsense. Nobody knows anything like this when they sign up. Also, vast majority of the leaks are coming out of Asian supply base as they did before the pandemic began.
Apple stock hits all time high and record revenues. Who f cares where their employees work so long as their happy.Apple builds literal spaceship and now workers want to stay home forever?
In my experience, people hang out at other’s cubicles talking about movies or sports leading to me being distracted sitting right next to that cubicle trying to do my work.In my personal experience, collaboration is vastly overrated. Collaboration often means 3-4 useless people hanging out with 1-2 people doing the actual work.
What crappy company do you work for?Good! In my work from home life during COVID I saw coworkers do "just enough" to keep their jobs while golfing, fishing and skateboarding "on the clock". Work got done, but the QUALITY of work suffered. Not everyone and every position is a good candidate for work from home. Apple has LOTS of work from home positions available. If one wants one, apply and get one. Those that have office positions either transfer to a work from home position or go to the office. Just because its POSSIBLE to do the work from home, doesnt mean its the most productive or the best option for the company.
I think that the biggest issue here is that blanket statements (that end up becoming policy due to PERSONAL bias) of "WFH is bad" or "WFH is the only way it should be" by Managers and Executives just don't make ANY sense.
You cannot apply the same paradigm to the entire company.
Some positions NECESSITATE in-person activities and/or collaboration. I cannot use the on-site labs from home.
Some thrive on it, even if it can be done remotely (as the last TWO YEARS have proven), like meetings, brainstorms, etc.
Other positions don't need in-person work AT ALL (like some software development/deployment, maintenance, etc).
Companies today need to start to take a good, hard look at the pros and cons of EACH scenario (or department) and see WFH as what it really is: an opportunity to reduce costs, increase morale and retention, and even reduce the impact we have on the environment, instead of falling back on Boomer-ish sentiments like: "Well, that's the way it was in my day" and "It's always been done this way, so suck it up, Snowflakes..."