Yes, because labor never has valid concerns and the companies are always right and good. Damn lazy workers.
Let’s try your phrasing in the context of modern labor laws and see how well it works
“Just let the people who don’t want to be locked in the factory go. Also let the families that don't want their children to work starve. Only the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory has the big insight as to what's necessary to efficiently conduct company operations that meet the company's needs.”
Yeah, that’s the ticket
I imagine that would make sense to someone. With zero relevancy to Apple. A cute straw man, though.
Apple, like all companies, have employment requirements based on the manner in which their operations are conducted.
If Apple needs people working in the office then it's best for people seeking work apply for employment where working at home makes sense for the company.
Cracks me up people here believing they have so much insight regarding Apple's needs. All based on zero knowledge about Apple's internal operations.
Perhaps you were a department/group/project/lab manager or VP at Apple at one time and can speak with some authority about this?