You are remembering it wrong. Steve did not want the use of a stylus to be required. Unfortunately he passed before the Apple Pencil was ready and he could announce what a great accessory it is for the iPad.Wasn't Steve Jobs against putting touch screens on Macs like how he is against using a stylus during the unveiling of the iPhone in 2007? Or am I remembering it wrong?
Nah ... I believe having a 'Pro' device vs regular device IS the new N.American and UK/Euro status symbol. You can already see it in the threads the past several years.The notch is just a status symbol
I don't understand what people have against a touch screen and why you think having one makes it cheap. I literally switched to Windows because Apple is to arrogant or stupid (greedy not to cannibalize iPad sells) because I wanted a desktop OS in a Tablet form. If apple would have simply made an iPad running MacOS (OS X) at the time I would have jumped on it. When the Surface devices were released, I said "I want that but with my iPad and OS X" and I really believed it would happen since you know, the did mainstream the whole touch screen and tablet categories...I am glad they aren't putting stupid touch screens on Mac's, lets leave that to the $300 Walmart special.
Keep believing Apple that only a few people want touch on a Mac...You must be one of the 5 people using Mac who want touch screen on it.
"I just don’t think Apple has figured out how to cut 2/3 from the component thickness"The notch has three dimensions.
Current Face ID array components are twice the thickness of MBP lid; how thick is your display?
Notch height is dictated by the menu bar, and Apple might not have liked the way a half height notch looked with the empty menu bar below it.
Notch width is dictated by the camera, two sensors, whatever extra width Apple wanted now, and probably structural aspects to it, maybe they put mini led related circuitry or components there. . They probably made it wide enough to fit Face ID in case they are able to reduce component thickness by 2/3.
I’m not saying Macs won’t get Face ID at some point, I just don’t think Apple has figured out how to cut 2/3 from the component thickness.
You're right it's more than a few.Keep believing Apple that only a few people want touch on a Mac...
Interesting view point, especially in the period that Surface sale has slowed down. Personally I don't believe we will see a hybrid but likely see 2 screens iPad mini kind of like those planner we had 15 years ago. I think if Apple make that it will be a hit.Nope, I don't personally see the utility in touch screens/bars - whenever I see people using them, it always looks to me like they've gone into slow motion. But I do think it's going to happen.
Surface sells are not down because people are losing interest in touch screens. Tou do realize that Apple is the ONLY computer manufacture that doesn't have a touch screen computer. Surfaces are down because they hadn't released anything really new in that time frame so there wasn't much demand. Next quarter results will tell a better story with the new releases they have doneInteresting view point, especially in the period that Surface sale has slowed down. Personally I don't believe we will see a hybrid but likely see 2 screens iPad mini kind of like those planner we had 15 years ago.
Very funnyAre you a t-Rex? ?
I don't think it can work that way. A more likely implementation is FaceID works only when your face is in a certain range to be 3D mapped at the necessary precision. If a FaceID camera could 3D map you from, say, 10ft away, that would indeed be impressive.FaceID on the Mac would be a disaster. It would unlock any time the camera can see that I am in the room. Maybe if you're the only person in the room, that is ok, but then i would ask why you are even locking your Mac? When i lock my Mac, i expect it remain locked until i deliberately tell it to unlock.
No. They will always be on phone and tablet.Touch Screen is not going away.
Yep. 5 people.People want it
There're already a negative on Surface. There will always negative when you compromise.There is no negative to adding one only benefits for people who want one.
But the Touch ID is not near where your hands are you always have to move it up right to use it, faceid would be better and give us touch screen we want it
It would do no such thing. I don't fully understand the reasoning behind Apple allowing iOS apps on macOS (the experience is often quite terrible) but I can assure you that there is wisdom in keeping the two worlds separate. Microsoft tried to merge the two worlds with Windows 8, and even they had to admit that was a mistake. The keyboard and mouse world is not an easy world to translate into a touchscreen world and vice versa. A lot of things don't really make sense in one, that do make sense in the other. What it does do (and this is very typical of Microsoft) is add a tremendous amount of complexity, where there previously was simplicity. Keeping the worlds separate allows for the best experience on both, as Apple has shown us, and Microsoft has learned.It would let macs run iOS apps and pave the way for iPads to run mac os apps
Bravo. I applaud Apple for innovating with the Touch Bar. It just didn't work out.They were not "wrong". TouchBar was a very cool idea, it just didn't work out in practice. If 100% of your bets are paying off, your bets are not daring enough.
Then just don't touch it. By doing this literally your concern is no longer relevant and the people who do want it can touch their screen.Speak for yourself. I don’t want a touch screen on a laptop. Imagine constantly pushing your screen and rocking the whole unit, even with a light tap.
He was talking as if that was your only input of method. With my surface pro, if I never wanted to touch the screen there is no problem because i still have a keyboard and mouse/touchpad. All a touch screen laptop is made for convenience and just trust me, its very convenient when you actually use it for certain things... Scrubbing through a video or song, enlarging pictures on the screen real quick. No one that has a touchscreen laptop uses just the screen for input because THAT is absurd.I don’t know, but didn’t Steve say something like they don’t work like…. almost 6-7 years ago?
The touch bar was Apple's knee jerk reaction to the MS Surface line and Desktop OS tablets becoming popular and realizing people actually did want touchscreen, after Apple said that NOBODY wants a touchscreen computer and since they can't admit fault and say they were wrong and do touchscreen Mac, you got the awesome magical brilliant innovate my ass touchbar... Never would have happened other wise and even they now see how stupid an idea it was since it seems to be going away.Bravo. I applaud Apple for innovating with the Touch Bar. It just didn't work out.
The 14 is not thicker than the 13 and the only reason why the 16 is slightly thicker is due to the new screen which means the computer part is thinner . All Apple did was remove the illusion of thinness caused by the tapering; the tapering that caused the intels to roar as soon as you opened one chrome tab
Imagine living in a world where a touchscreen on a laptop and trackpad can coexist peacefully.Speak for yourself. I don’t want a touch screen on a laptop. Imagine constantly pushing your screen and rocking the whole unit, even with a light tap.
Then just don't touch it. By doing this literally your concern is no longer relevant and the people who do want it can touch their screen.