I so do not understand people thinking just because its a touch screen I have to use it mentality.Imagine living in a world where a touchscreen on a laptop and trackpad can coexist peacefully.
I so do not understand people thinking just because its a touch screen I have to use it mentality.Imagine living in a world where a touchscreen on a laptop and trackpad can coexist peacefully.
But why? You're telling me you wouldn't love an iPad with MacOS on it that you can use touch screen and have a tablet but then dock the tablet to a full keyboard, mouse and display and act like a desktop or an attachable keyboard like surface and have a laptop.Rather Apple not invest in dev time to make MacOS touch screen capable. Want a touch experience? Get an iPad with a glorified phone OS.
Yeah that's a very good point. Now we will never know if it failed because of what they added, or because of what they took away. I personally loved the touch bar, but I hated having to use it for adjusting volume and brightness.I do wonder how it would have gone over if the TouchBar had been above a row of "standard" functions keys (full height or half height). I think the idea is good, and was worth exploring, but having to look at your fingers to, say, adjust the volume, rather than doing it by feel, was a bad idea.
And replacing the Escape key with a tappable picture of one was a completely brain-dead idea, obviously promoted by someone who has never actually properly used Unix - both Vi and Emacs (and lots of programs that mimic their editing keystrokes, like, say, every shell) require use of the Escape key - it's not a nicety, it's vital. Once they restored the physical Escape key to its corner, I was ambivalent about the rest of the TouchBar.
Yeah it continues to surprise me that people don't understand the point. He's saying that if you HAVE to use a stylus, that's a terrible experience. Why on earth would he or anyone else think it's bad that you CAN use a pen, for drawing!SJ, as an fan of artists and calligraphy, wasn’t against something like the Pencil, but rather didn’t want a stylus to be the main method of OS interaction.
Umm, then just don't touch the screen? You do realize you literally can have a Mac touch screen laptop and not change anything of your normal routine input usage and believe it or not have your screen as clean as a laptop without a touch screen right? I mean it really is that simple. Just don't touch it and your problem is solved. For everyone else they get the benefit and convenience of one when they want to use it...I don't want a touch screen on a laptop! I'm not doing my work peering through a layer of fingerprints.
Yeah at first I thought it would be a gimmick but now I can't even think about having to actually put in a password. The only time it fails is in situations where I am outside and its bright as hell. Everywhere else it just unlocks when I pick it up almost instantly. I was really surprised on how good it actually was.I use Windows Hello face ID on my laptop and it is perfectly useful in all circumstances and not a bit awkward.
That's not exactly true. macOS of today is very sub optimal for touch input, so it would have to change if they add a touch screen. Apple wouldn't accept a situation where touch input is mediocre, like when windows released the same UI for all platforms back in the day, "metro".Umm, then just don't touch the screen? You do realize you literally can have a Mac touch screen laptop and not change anything of your normal routine input usage and believe it or not have your screen as clean as a laptop without a touch screen right? I mean it really is that simple. Just don't touch it and your problem is solved. For everyone else they get the benefit and convenience of one when they want to use it...
Now you are just making excuses that aren't even relevant to what. I explained I said by them putting a touchscreen, nothing has to change with how you use your device if you don't want to. Your screen will be just ad clean as a non touchscreen and of course if they went touchscreen they would optimize it. Even then you can continue to use it the exact same way as before still without touching the screen. There is literally no loss to you and only benefits to others. Why wouldn't someone want that unless they are a narcissist.That's not exactly true. macOS of today is very sub optimal for touch input, so it would have to change if they add a touch screen. Apple wouldn't accept a situation where touch input is mediocre, like when windows released the same UI for all platforms back in the day, "metro".
Technically sure, but in reality Apple would never "just put a touchscreen" on a mac. They would only do it if they can make the OS very touch friendly, which inevitably means compromises.Now you are just making excuses that aren't even relevant to what. I explained I said by them putting a touchscreen, nothing has to change with how you use your device if you don't want to. Your screen will be just ad clean as a non touchscreen and of course if they went touchscreen they would optimize it. Even then you can continue to use it the exact same way as before still without touching the screen. There is literally no loss to you and only benefits to others. Why wouldn't someone want that unless they are a narcissist.
The only compromise they are worried about is canabalizing ipad sells.Technically sure, but in reality Apple would never "just put a touchscreen" on a mac. They would only do it if they can make the OS very touch friendly, which inevitably means compromises.
didn't use chrome, didn't roar when I opened a tab
Imagine living in a world where a touchscreen on a laptop and trackpad can coexist peacefully.
I so do not understand people thinking just because its a touch screen I have to use it mentality.
Spoken like someone who has never experienced “move closer to the camera” with windows Hello. What I wouldn’t give to press a button rather than have to move my entire body every time I authenticate.
Politely disagree. The "vocal minority" is actually you and the devout nerd tech junkies on these types of sites.Looking forward to FaceID in next year's pro/higher-end iMac line. I've got a feeling it would make more sense to include in a computer that is always open, and can already (like the laptops, I guess) use a Watch to unlock.
So happy there are no plans for a touchscreen Mac. The vocal minority have lusted for and expected it for years, but there's no point with the iPad Pro existing. Imagine trying to control even a 24" iMac with your fingers, your arm would fall off after 20 minutes.
Yes, desktops, which literally no one buys except corporations, does not make sense.I don't know anyone who's asking for touchscreens on desktop OS's anymore. Even Windows stopped focusing on that with the failure that Windows 8 turned out to be. The UI on a desktop OS is meant to be used with a mouse/keyboard. You're leaving out primary users when you start replacing UI elements to cater to a niche user base. As of now, professionals such as programmers and data scientists, rely on macOS. Believe it or not, macOS isn't only made for YouTube video editors and photoshopping.
inb4 "but creatives ARE professionals". no they're not. >99% of creatives are just creatives. Nothing against them, but to demand YouTubers, social media influencers, or freelancers who hang out at Starbucks be called professionals is as ridiculous as getting a Ph.D in Janitorial Sciences. Apple could sell specialized computers to Pixar Studios and Lucas Films directly at a premium, but they make more money off you schmucks buying a larger volume.
Edit: Not only that, but running a malware script requiring admin privileges would be laughably easy to exploit on FaceID.
They're holding back on FaceID to offer it as a feature later on. Thats the only reason as to why they would hold off on it. If they truly felt it wasn't necessary, then we wouldn't have it on the iPhone either. Their excuses are the same as when they didn't have iPhones with 3G or multitasking, they simply don't hold up to any part of logic.
No touchscreen on Macs is because they know they can sell iPads that have a touch screen in addition to a laptop that doesn't. Having a touch screen wouldn't hurt the laptops at all, and can be disabled if someone truly hates it as well.
I don't think you know what a "desktop OS" is vs a desktop. Laptops use a desktop OS, as that's what laptops are primarily used for. Laptops are quite literally a portable desktop. People get it for the sole purpose of using it with a keyboard and mouse/trackpad, to do actual work, whether it be excel spreadsheets or crunching through powerpoint slides while making Anki cards, or watching a lecture while taking notes, or compiling software. Most people who buy a laptop don't even use the touchscreen (nor did they use the Touch Bar), so its counterintuitive to add cost to something most people wouldn't use.Yes, desktops, which literally no one buys except corporations, does not make sense.
Laptops, which outsell 3-1 in the consumer market, where your fingers are near teh screen and the screen can flip over makes more sense.
Microsoft was onto something with Surface Book, the product I wish Apple would make. IOS and MacOS more than ever could be the same bloody OS now that they use the same architecture.
No one needs touch all the time, but at times touch is awesome to have... same with keyboard and mouse input on an iPad. It's the same thing, yet everyone is all for that even though it's lackluster experience compared to a Mac.
If iPad sales hasn't rebounded, I would bet money Apple would have shown up Microsoft's efforts. For something they are so against, they sure do invest enough in protypes, patents, development, etc. of the things they say they have no interest in....
View attachment 1885307
just imagining things.