No - it's really not an issue. "feature" phones are the ones running older OSes and those phones aren't used or need to be used in the same way as the newer smartphones.
Google's Android version stats only include active Google Play users.
No - it's really not an issue. "feature" phones are the ones running older OSes and those phones aren't used or need to be used in the same way as the newer smartphones.
Seperate specs- That has nothing to do with fragmentation in any way, they run identical operating systems. You don't even know what you're talking about.
Legacy App program- Will actually mean users have a better experience on down level iOS versions making iOS "fragmentation" to the extent it exists less painful.
iPod Touch - So you buy a device with a processor that came out in 2010 and expect it to run the latest and greatest stuff in 2013? Give me a break. What you're doing is the equivalent to me being upset my first gen iPad (also with an A4) doesn't run iOS7.
Nice straw man. Whether people care or not is not the issue companies need to worry about. If you're two years behind on an Android OS, you're missing features. Features that most likely Android had before iOS. But the person with the 2 year Android phone starts looking at the newer iOS on, say, a friend's device and thinks, "Oh, nice features." And the seed to switch is planted.
You are so wrong. It's THE issue with Android right now.
You are so wrong. It's THE issue with Android right now.
Image
Well for one - his comment about making a less expensive iPhone is a bit spin. They were looking to "refresh" their phone and appeal to a wider demographic by producing options in a phone which previously had no options (IE - colors) without "harming" their premier brand.
As for fragmentation. That argument is old. Especially because most people switch phones around 2 years (or less). And even though they might be running an older OS - it's still feature rich and the core apps get updated regularly. So you might have an older OS - but the core apps aren't "old."
But I wouldn't expect the CEO of Apple to state otherwise - just like I wouldn't expect the CEO of Google to talk about how a closed ecosystem is a great choice.
Please provide me with quotes where their sales are down year over year. You just sound like a troll.
As for fragmentation. That argument is old. Especially because most people switch phones around 2 years (or less).
That doesn't really answer the poster's question -- how is the 5C @ $99 bad for customers? Just because it's in a plastic shell doesn't defacto make it a less usable phone? And the reality is it's likely going in a plastic case upon purchase.
You have any sort of stats to back that up? People that like gadgets update their phone a lot. But how many people that is....who knows. I know plenty of people that buy a phone and use it until it breaks.
Do you ever post more than a few words?
Nice straw man. Whether people care or not is not the issue companies need to worry about. If you're two years behind on an Android OS, you're missing features. Features that most likely Android had before iOS. But the person with the 2 year Android phone starts looking at the newer iOS on, say, a friend's device and thinks, "Oh, nice features." And the seed to switch is planted.
So it's perfectly fine for Android to be bashed for phones with different specs and legacy devices to not run the latest OS, but for Apple devices, it's perfectly reasonable to think so?
That chart that's been posted many times - how many of those devices running Gingerbread were sold in the past 2 years? Virtually none. But it's FRAGMENTATION! with Android, but my LESS THAN 2 year old iPod - it came out in 2011 with the 4s, my friend - it's outrageous for me to think it would run iOS7. Hypocrisy at its finest.
Can you please tell me what info you require? Which sales? Was it the Mac sales that I quoted? The ones that I quoted from MacRumors which they in turn quoted a few weeks back? Keep up! I'm no troll but I do ask questions you may feel uneasy about as you are a fanboy right?
https://www.macrumors.com/2013/08/1...ver-year-drop-expected-for-september-quarter/
Right after you tell me why Siri wasn't available on the iPhone 4 despite being proven it world work fine. Perhaps because Samsung is initially pushing people towards the latest hardware. I don't believe they said it works only with the newest version of Android.
Silly argument anyway since the number of people buying the watch will be low ;-)
Your iPod model is more than two years old.So on the eve of launching two separate phones with different specs and just days after launching a legacy app program and after yesterday's iOS7 release that I can't use on my less than two year old iPod, we're bashing Android for fragmentation?
Siri performance is contingent upon an Audience noise cancellation co-processor and algorithm, which in turn allows Siri to be better able to discern speech in outdoor conditions with lots of ambient noise.
The software for Siri itself running was never the source of the issue.
Something similar will happen next year when the iWatch needs M7.
Either way it's a hardware concern, where the Galaxy Gear situation is 100% android fragmentation.
Fun with adoption....already, 1/3 of iOS users are on iOS 7 - only 21 hours after release. Meanwhile, it took Android a YEAR after Jellybean's release to gain 1/3 of users...and that's over multiple version of JB. Currently, only 0.64% of Android users are on 4.3, the most recent version of Android.
https://mixpanel.com/trends/#report/ios_7