Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It isn’t irrelevant and laugh all you want, no shock that politicians lie just amazed people make excuses or side step it because they happen to have an R or D next to their name, very pathetic. And yet again this is bigger than a vaccine but people can’t see the forest for the trees.
It is irrelevant because the story isn’t about politicians, and the virus doesn’t care about politics in the slightest.

It’s a virus, it just wants to reproduce by invading your cells and turning them into a factories to make more copies of itself, until there’s no more room inside them, and they explode open like virus-filled water balloons and go on to infect more cells.

Vaccine mandates if you want to go to school or do particular jobs etc, particularly in the US, are nothing new.

I’d argue you’re the one who can’t see the global pandemic forest, for the “but people shouldn’t have to do a really easy free thing that protects them and others!” trees.

Israeli study: 6.7x better immunity too
Not sure exactly which study you’re referring to, but I’ve seen some incredibly dodgy numbers being thrown around from there, and their stuff often seems to be a bit of an outlier compared to other places. Kentucky for example.

And of course, there’s no downside to getting vaccinated if you’ve recovered from COVID previously, it’s all just immune system training, and it’s not like you can really have too much of that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: icerabbit
How do you know it has saved a large numbers of lives when it's still so new? How do you exactly know that?
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-57549796 Many countries have banned AZ.

3. Everyone that I personally know that have had COVID have not ended up in a hospital anyway, so… Still, you can't force people to be labour rats and take them this 'vaccine'.
If I may chip this in. ONS in the UK does some excellent work pulling together the numbers. There are a few other well regarded orgs that also produce excellent summaries and produce research work on the subject.
They link to research from relevant bodies as well as using stats produced by the government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hop
Even if you survive covid you have to deal with the long term symptoms.One of my Co workers was a runner before she got covid-19 she can't run anymore because her lungs still at full capacity and her covid-19 infection was a year ago.

I myself has covid-19 and I've been struggle with depression and anxiety since then. Brain fog and lack of concentration has also been a problem for and I never had this issue prior to covid-19.
Yeah, one of my friends with long COVID used to be a runner too, though many months later he’s still really ill. He actually lost his job because of it.

Though it’s not really a fun thing to post, the evidence suggests it’s unlikely you’re just imagining the cognitive impacts, as it’s looking increasingly like the virus can get inside the brain, and cognitive impacts are quite well established at this point.

There’s some indications that getting vaccinated can help some people with long COVID feel better, though I don’t think it’s been properly proven yet, and it seems like a safe assumption that you probably have been vaccinated anyway.
 
Israeli study: 6.7x better immunity too
First, I note that the Isreali study has not been peer reviewed.

Second - what practical use does that study have? Don't get immunized, cos if you get COVID, and DON'T DIE, then you'll have a better natural immunity to getting it again? What kind of logic is that?

People who are not immunized, around the world, are filling up hospital beds faster than people who are immunized.

Stop ignoring the information being supplied by actual proper channels.

The governments and scientists of the world are not trying to kill you. A virus is. And immunisations are working.
 
Evolution in action.
Unfortunately, this smug response of the woke is the rule rather than the exception. Rather that trying to encourage people to get vaccinated, the statement is heartless. You genuinely do not care whether someone lives or dies over this. But hey, you are smart, and dumb people do not deserve to live. We need less of this in America.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tpfang56
Shame we can't just add the vaccine to horse dewormer and have it work, cause that way we could make sure everyone is vaccinated!
Or better yet just take ivermectin and not have to worry about having your DNA irreversibly altered by a company you have no legal recourse against if there are issues with said reprogramming. (Of which we can’t possibly know of this early in the trial.)
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: tpfang56
Revolving door, wasn’t the previous head of the FDA now on Pfizer’s Board. 😉

Remember who everyone just about lost their minds when Ajit Pai was picked to head the FCC? Complete crickets on this fact.
 
If I may chip this in. ONS in the UK does some excellent work pulling together the numbers. There are a few other well regarded orgs that also produce excellent summaries and produce research work on the subject.
They link to research from relevant bodies as well as using stats produced by the government.
Of course you may, sir.
We're all allowed to say our own opinions here (hopefully).

I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but after seeing my friend so sick after receiving AZ and reading that you can't choose which vaccination you get (at least in my country) I have decided not to get it.

I also live alone in a foreign country and should something happen I can't quickly seek for help, I guess. At least I'm not hearing: "You should die" etc like I did on reddit, which I appreciate very much. I'm also surprised by the fact that people do not attack me here.

I am afraid of blood clots and as long as scientists haven't figured out exactly how safe the vaccine actually is I'm not getting it.
Also, over here the numbers of COVID infections is getting lower and ever since this Corona lockdown started, I haven't gotten sick even once. Still though, I'm afraid of the vaccination and of COVID and I can work remotely, so I'll stay away from people as much as I can, but I still think it's safe not to trust the vaccinations.
 
Vaccine *mandates* are absolutely political.
This isn't about mandates; this is about encouraging people to get vaccinated. And mandates aren't political. We've had them for years...we all had to be vaccinated against deadly diseases to go to school. This is not new. Lots of things are mandated to prevent illness, injury, and death. Nothing new to see here.
 
If I may chip this in. ONS in the UK does some excellent work pulling together the numbers.
That's fascinating, because of this: "Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines remain at least as effective as protection from prior natural infection against the Delta variant."

"At least as effective is prior natural infection." The implication here being prior natural infection is effective against the Delta variant. Yet, to hear many health officials tell it, here in the U.S., at least, prior natural infection is no defense against Covid-19, much less the Delta variant. That you should still get vaccinated, even if you had been infected.

Then some turn around and claim these vaccines will prevent you from contracting Covid-19 and prevent you from spreading it, yet this is known to be entirely untrue. The best they can do is moderate your symptoms. Which explains why even those with vaccines may still be obliged to mask up.

There's a pattern to this kind of thing (again: At least here in the U.S.) that creates skepticism. E.g.: One year whomever determines these things got the annual influenza vaccine entirely wrong. The result being is what they were jabbing people with was less than something like 23% effective against the prevalent influenza that season. But still the incessant drumbeat from the health experts and the dominant "news" media that you should get your flu shot "because..."

This illustrates to why many people, myself included, have yet to have submitted to the stab. The health officials, the "news" media, etc. have been wrong so many times, in so many ways, and, at other times, have promulgated so much contradictory or downright false information, many people no longer trust a damn thing they're saying.

I'm one of those people, and here's an interesting note: I was recently briefly hospitalized. Three-to-four times I was asked "Have you been vaccinated against Covid-19?" "No," I responded. "Why not?" I was asked. "Because I remain unconvinced of the current vaccines' efficacy or safety," was my response.

In two of those exchanges I received the following counter-"arguments": The ER nurse. His response: "Well, get convinced," and he left it at that. One of the doctors or nurses asked "Did you get the shingles vaccine?" "No." "Pneumococcal vaccine?" "No." "Do you get the seasonal flu vaccines?" "No. I generally don't get sick, and, when I do, it's usually not severe." She dropped it.

I found neither of those counter-"arguments" compelling.

So, no: I haven't gotten "the stab." I don't plan to get it. If I am eventually compelled to do so, it will be the J&J vaccine, which is a true vaccine, rather than an mRNA experiment. (Yes, I know the Pfizer "vaccine" is now FDA approved. The FDA has approved a lot of stuff it was subsequently discovered it shouldn't have, over the years, so I regard that as an unconvincing argument.) I think there's another true vaccine with emergency use authorization in Europe?
 
  • Love
Reactions: Razorpit
not all discrimination is bad

if one cannot be vaccinated for a legitimate health reason that’s one thing

but if one just refuses to do the right thing for others around them because “freedom” or some conspiracy nonsense then they should be discriminated against
And yet you call yourself antifa. Cognitive dissonance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jseymour
Coincidentally, I just tripped-across this on another forum. I didn't go looking for it. It found me, you could say.

COVID Vaccine Injury Reports Jump by 27,000 in One Week as FDA Pulls ‘Bait and Switch’ With Pfizer Vaccine Approval

VAERS data released Friday by the CDC showed a total of 623,343 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 13,627 deaths and 84,466 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 20, 2021.

by Megan Redshaw August 27, 2021

Data released today by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Aug. 20, 2021, a total of 623,343 total adverse events were reported to VAERS, including 13,627 deaths — an increase of 559 over the data released last week.

There were 84,466 reports of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 3,416 compared with the previous week.
Full article: COVID Vaccine Injury Reports Jump by 27,000 in One Week as FDA Pulls ‘Bait and Switch’ With Pfizer Vaccine Approval

Anybody see any of this reported in the dominant "news" media? I haven't. (Then again, in all honesty: I rarely pay much heed to the stuff billed as "news" anymore.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Razorpit
That's fascinating, because of this: "Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines remain at least as effective as protection from prior natural infection against the Delta variant."

"At least as effective is prior natural infection." The implication here being prior natural infection is effective against the Delta variant. Yet, to hear many health officials tell it, here in the U.S., at least, prior natural infection is no defense against Covid-19, much less the Delta variant. That you should still get vaccinated, even if you had been infected.

Then some turn around and claim these vaccines will prevent you from contracting Covid-19 and prevent you from spreading it, yet this is known to be entirely untrue. The best they can do is moderate your symptoms. Which explains why even those with vaccines may still be obliged to mask up.

There's a pattern to this kind of thing (again: At least here in the U.S.) that creates skepticism. E.g.: One year whomever determines these things got the annual influenza vaccine entirely wrong. The result being is what they were jabbing people with was less than something like 23% effective against the prevalent influenza that season. But still the incessant drumbeat from the health experts and the dominant "news" media that you should get your flu shot "because..."

This illustrates to why many people, myself included, have yet to have submitted to the stab. The health officials, the "news" media, etc. have been wrong so many times, in so many ways, and, at other times, have promulgated so much contradictory or downright false information, many people no longer trust a damn thing they're saying.

I'm one of those people, and here's an interesting note: I was recently briefly hospitalized. Three-to-four times I was asked "Have you been vaccinated against Covid-19?" "No," I responded. "Why not?" I was asked. "Because I remain unconvinced of the current vaccines' efficacy or safety," was my response.

In two of those exchanges I received the following counter-"arguments": The ER nurse. His response: "Well, get convinced," and he left it at that. One of the doctors or nurses asked "Did you get the shingles vaccine?" "No." "Pneumococcal vaccine?" "No." "Do you get the seasonal flu vaccines?" "No. I generally don't get sick, and, when I do, it's usually not severe." She dropped it.

I found neither of those counter-"arguments" compelling.

So, no: I haven't gotten "the stab." I don't plan to get it. If I am eventually compelled to do so, it will be the J&J vaccine, which is a true vaccine, rather than an mRNA experiment. (Yes, I know the Pfizer "vaccine" is now FDA approved. The FDA has approved a lot of stuff it was subsequently discovered it shouldn't have, over the years, so I regard that as an unconvincing argument.) I think there's another true vaccine with emergency use authorization in Europe?
It shouldn't be read as a singular argument though, and as with all research, this is fluid. And if it is using "least", it infers the minimum and better protection on the whole with the jab. When you tie up the roll out in the UK and the hospitalisations and deaths, the is a corresponding drop just lagging the jab. The other issue is the longer this is in the community, the bigger chance to avoid the vaccine. UK has form with Delta.
Don't forget, we have the results of no vaccine vs covid. It is not good. Now we have vaccine vs covid, and it is far better, but not ideal. For me, I doubt I would survive covid without some serious intervention. That is a toss of the coin I do not like.

Re flu jab. I get that every year, they do the best to predict what will be the 3 worst and make the vaccines for that, bound to not be perfect every year to bake in the jab routine for every autumn. But the flu is small potatoes compared to covid for lethality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hop
Or better yet just take ivermectin and not have to worry about having your DNA irreversibly altered by a company you have no legal recourse against if there are issues with said reprogramming. (Of which we can’t possibly know of this early in the trial.)
I know this rumour is pretty widespread, but it is scientifically impossible for any of the COVID vaccines to alter your DNA, and there is no evidence of it happening either.

With the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) they literally cannot even physically get into the nucleus of your cells where your DNA is, and even if they could, they don’t have the fancy enzymes required to turn the mRNA into DNA then actually modify the DNA. Though the ADV-based ones (Oxford/AZ and J&J) can get into the nucleus, they again lack the enzymes that would be needed to actually modify DNA:


I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but after seeing my friend so sick after receiving AZ and reading that you can't choose which vaccination you get (at least in my country) I have decided not to get it.

I also live alone in a foreign country and should something happen I can't quickly seek for help, I guess. At least I'm not hearing: "You should die" etc like I did on reddit, which I appreciate very much. I'm also surprised by the fact that people do not attack me here.

I am afraid of blood clots and as long as scientists haven't figured out exactly how safe the vaccine actually is I'm not getting it.
Also, over here the numbers of COVID infections is getting lower and ever since this Corona lockdown started, I haven't gotten sick even once. Still though, I'm afraid of the vaccination and of COVID and I can work remotely, so I'll stay away from people as much as I can, but I still think it's safe not to trust the vaccinations.
As I said before vaccine side effects are caused by your innate immune system responding to what it thinks it a threat. A lot of people don't get any, or simply get a sore arm for a couple of days, but even people who have their immune system respond more strongly, still generally quite quite mild symptoms that are common with many other vaccines, which can be easily treated with some paracetamol/ibuprofen and a bit of rest, and which go away within a few days once the adaptive immune system takes over from the innate part. The data on this is clear, though I also know multiple people who had AZ, and they had no issues beyond a sore arm and feeling a bit tired for a day or so.

One of the key things to remember when it comes to more serious apparent side effects is that coincidences absolutely do happen when you're vaccinating people at this scale, and one of the things human beings are great at is seeing patterns in things that are unrelated. Scientists figure out if it's just a coincidence by seeing if the number of people reporting something is higher than we’d expect by chance. That's how we found out there's a tiny chance of a certain kind of blood clot with the AZ vaccine, but all the reports people have made of farting post vaccination (139 in the UK for Pfizer, 393 for AZ, remember we've used AZ more than Pfizer) haven't led to it becoming a listed side effect.

I don't know which country you're in, but the AZ vaccine is safe and effective. I'm in my 30s so because of the tiny blood clot risk I wouldn't normally be offered it here, but there's a 1/3 chance it's the vaccine I got in the clinical trial I'm in, and I was fine with that because the risk is tiny (it's a 1 in 50,000 chance, I'm 208x more likely to die in a car accident), it's only for a few weeks after vaccination that it can occur, they can be treated, and as before, COVID itself causes far more blood clots.

Scientists absolutely have figured out how safe the vaccines are. Hundreds of thousands of people joined trials to test the vaccines for you, and since then billions of doses of the authorised vaccines have been given around the world. All the data we've had since then hasn't changed what we know about their safety and effectiveness.

Can you tell me exactly are you waiting for confirmation of?

That's fascinating, because of this: "Pfizer/BioNTech and Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccines remain at least as effective as protection from prior natural infection against the Delta variant."

"At least as effective is prior natural infection." The implication here being prior natural infection is effective against the Delta variant. Yet, to hear many health officials tell it, here in the U.S., at least, prior natural infection is no defense against Covid-19, much less the Delta variant. That you should still get vaccinated, even if you had been infected.
Yes, because the evidence we have (for example) indicates that prior infection is not as good as protection from the vaccines, and there's no downside to getting vaccinated if you've previously survived COVID.
Then some turn around and claim these vaccines will prevent you from contracting Covid-19 and prevent you from spreading it, yet this is known to be entirely untrue. The best they can do is moderate your symptoms. Which explains why even those with vaccines may still be obliged to mask up.
The evidence we have shows that they do significantly reduce transmission of the virus, and significantly reduce your odds of being infected, even before we talk about how effective they are at preventing symptoms and how incredibly effective they are at preventing serious cases and deaths. Delta being much more infectious is more of a challenge when it comes to the transmission side of things, but as you're still far less likely to get infected to begin with if you're vaccinated, you're therefore inherently less likely to infect others as a result.

There's many reasons that a lot of vaccinated folks are still wearing masks, and while part of it is that no vaccine is perfect, so while they help, they can't magically make someone who is immunosuppressed from chemo, have the same immune system as a healthy 20 year old, and that there are some people, particularly kids, who still can't get vaccinated, it's mostly it's that it's sensible to have a multi-layered strategy against something like this, and masks are a very easy component of that.
There's a pattern to this kind of thing (again: At least here in the U.S.) that creates skepticism. E.g.: One year whomever determines these things got the annual influenza vaccine entirely wrong. The result being is what they were jabbing people with was less than something like 23% effective against the prevalent influenza that season. But still the incessant drumbeat from the health experts and the dominant "news" media that you should get your flu shot "because..."
This is because the flu strains that circulate each year vary, which means scientists have to try to predict which strains will be prevalent, and unfortunately sometimes their predictions aren't correct. The same doesn't apply with COVID so far as we know that the authorised vaccines are still working well even with Delta.
This illustrates to why many people, myself included, have yet to have submitted to the stab. The health officials, the "news" media, etc. have been wrong so many times, in so many ways, and, at other times, have promulgated so much contradictory or downright false information, many people no longer trust a damn thing they're saying.
It's true that scientists and public health officials aren't able to perfectly predict the future, but that doesn't mean that just because sometimes their predictions have been wrong, it's better to ignore what the overwhelming majority of doctors, scientists, and researchers, are telling you. After all, you went to the hospital recently, which means you trusted doctors enough to get treatment from them for whatever that was, why does that trust apparently disappear when it comes to this?
I'm one of those people, and here's an interesting note: I was recently briefly hospitalized. Three-to-four times I was asked "Have you been vaccinated against Covid-19?" "No," I responded. "Why not?" I was asked. "Because I remain unconvinced of the current vaccines' efficacy or safety," was my response.

In two of those exchanges I received the following counter-"arguments": The ER nurse. His response: "Well, get convinced," and he left it at that. One of the doctors or nurses asked "Did you get the shingles vaccine?" "No." "Pneumococcal vaccine?" "No." "Do you get the seasonal flu vaccines?" "No. I generally don't get sick, and, when I do, it's usually not severe." She dropped it.

I found neither of those counter-"arguments" compelling.
I'm sorry that (likely exhausted) nurses and doctors didn't spend a load of time trying to convince you to get vaccinated, but that literally isn't their job, and as someone who has spent a load of time talking to vaccine hesitant people, holy moly it can be utterly exhausting and difficult, and I don't have to try to do it in the middle of a hospital shift, but hey, let's see how you respond to someone actually trying to do that for you here:

I'm pleased to hear you generally don't get that sick, but there's a lot of other people who said the exact same thing, who were really healthy, who still either got really sick and died, had to spend a lot of time in hospital to survive it, and/or were left with long term damage from it. I've got multiple friends with long COVID and it's utterly terrible, especially because it isn't clear that they're ever actually going to recover.

The problem with not getting vaccinated because you don't think it'll be much of an issue if you're infected, even aside from impacts on anyone else or making it easier for the virus to come up with new mutation inside you, is that by the time you're infected and very sick, it's too late to get vaccinated, and considering how super infectious Delta is, it's more a case of when, rather than if, you'll get infected by it.
So, no: I haven't gotten "the stab." I don't plan to get it. If I am eventually compelled to do so, it will be the J&J vaccine, which is a true vaccine, rather than an mRNA experiment. (Yes, I know the Pfizer "vaccine" is now FDA approved. The FDA has approved a lot of stuff it was subsequently discovered it shouldn't have, over the years, so I regard that as an unconvincing argument.) I think there's another true vaccine with emergency use authorization in Europe?
As I've now said something like 3 times in this thread, the authorised vaccines are not "experiments" anymore because hundreds of thousands of people joined clinical trials to test them, the first ones starting roughly 16 months ago, and the phase 3 results being peer-reviewed and published last year (Pfizer, Moderna) and early this year (J&J). All they're still checking with those trial participants now is how long the protection lasts, as there really isn't any kind of biological mechanism that could cause a side effect to occur after a few months. Here's a thread from an immunologist on this, and an article from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia that goes over how it’s never taken more than about 2 months for a side effect to occur after vaccination.

While I get that people can be unsure about new technology, the fears around the mRNA vaccines aren't well founded, partly because of the sheer amount of data we have on how safe and effective they are, but also because the way they, and mRNA itself, works, the mRNA itself is only in your system for a few days. It's literally destroyed by the enzymes in your cells once the ribosomes have read it, and even if it wasn't, mRNA is a super fragile thing that quickly breaks down naturally in your body anyway. I mean Pfizer has to be stored frozen at -70C (-94F), and once a dose has been mixed up for use, it has to be used within 6 hours or thrown away because it'll have degraded too much to be effective. Now remember your body is normally around 37C (98F). As such, one of the key challenges with these vaccines was just getting the mRNA to last long enough to get into some cells and get to the ribosomes without being destroyed first.

They have been incredibly thoroughly tested, all of them are definitely vaccines, and all of them actually use quite a similar technique to help train your immune system, J&J and AZ just go in at a slightly higher level (conceptually) than the mRNA ones do.

If you've got any particular concerns left, go ahead and ask and I'll see if I can clarify things. I'm in a trial for a new vaccine being tested so made sure to do my research first, plus I find this stuff pretty interesting anyway.
 
I know this rumour is pretty widespread, but it is scientifically impossible for any of the COVID vaccines to alter your DNA, and there is no evidence of it happening either.

With the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) they literally cannot even physically get into the nucleus of your cells where your DNA is, and even if they could, they don’t have the fancy enzymes required to turn the mRNA into DNA then actually modify the DNA. Though the ADV-based ones (Oxford/AZ and J&J) can get into the nucleus, they again lack the enzymes that would be needed to actually modify DNA:



As I said before vaccine side effects are caused by your innate immune system responding to what it thinks it a threat. A lot of people don't get any, or simply get a sore arm for a couple of days, but even people who have their immune system respond more strongly, still generally quite quite mild symptoms that are common with many other vaccines, which can be easily treated with some paracetamol/ibuprofen and a bit of rest, and which go away within a few days once the adaptive immune system takes over from the innate part. The data on this is clear, though I also know multiple people who had AZ, and they had no issues beyond a sore arm and feeling a bit tired for a day or so.

One of the key things to remember when it comes to more serious apparent side effects is that coincidences absolutely do happen when you're vaccinating people at this scale, and one of the things human beings are great at is seeing patterns in things that are unrelated. Scientists figure out if it's just a coincidence by seeing if the number of people reporting something is higher than we’d expect by chance. That's how we found out there's a tiny chance of a certain kind of blood clot with the AZ vaccine, but all the reports people have made of farting post vaccination (139 in the UK for Pfizer, 393 for AZ, remember we've used AZ more than Pfizer) haven't led to it becoming a listed side effect.

I don't know which country you're in, but the AZ vaccine is safe and effective. I'm in my 30s so because of the tiny blood clot risk I wouldn't normally be offered it here, but there's a 1/3 chance it's the vaccine I got in the clinical trial I'm in, and I was fine with that because the risk is tiny (it's a 1 in 50,000 chance, I'm 208x more likely to die in a car accident), it's only for a few weeks after vaccination that it can occur, they can be treated, and as before, COVID itself causes far more blood clots.

Scientists absolutely have figured out how safe the vaccines are. Hundreds of thousands of people joined trials to test the vaccines for you, and since then billions of doses of the authorised vaccines have been given around the world. All the data we've had since then hasn't changed what we know about their safety and effectiveness.

Can you tell me exactly are you waiting for confirmation of?


Yes, because the evidence we have (for example) indicates that prior infection is not as good as protection from the vaccines, and there's no downside to getting vaccinated if you've previously survived COVID.

The evidence we have shows that they do significantly reduce transmission of the virus, and significantly reduce your odds of being infected, even before we talk about how effective they are at preventing symptoms and how incredibly effective they are at preventing serious cases and deaths. Delta being much more infectious is more of a challenge when it comes to the transmission side of things, but as you're still far less likely to get infected to begin with if you're vaccinated, you're therefore inherently less likely to infect others as a result.

There's many reasons that a lot of vaccinated folks are still wearing masks, and while part of it is that no vaccine is perfect, so while they help, they can't magically make someone who is immunosuppressed from chemo, have the same immune system as a healthy 20 year old, and that there are some people, particularly kids, who still can't get vaccinated, it's mostly it's that it's sensible to have a multi-layered strategy against something like this, and masks are a very easy component of that.

This is because the flu strains that circulate each year vary, which means scientists have to try to predict which strains will be prevalent, and unfortunately sometimes their predictions aren't correct. The same doesn't apply with COVID so far as we know that the authorised vaccines are still working well even with Delta.

It's true that scientists and public health officials aren't able to perfectly predict the future, but that doesn't mean that just because sometimes their predictions have been wrong, it's better to ignore what the overwhelming majority of doctors, scientists, and researchers, are telling you. After all, you went to the hospital recently, which means you trusted doctors enough to get treatment from them for whatever that was, why does that trust apparently disappear when it comes to this?

I'm sorry that (likely exhausted) nurses and doctors didn't spend a load of time trying to convince you to get vaccinated, but that literally isn't their job, and as someone who has spent a load of time talking to vaccine hesitant people, holy moly it can be utterly exhausting and difficult, and I don't have to try to do it in the middle of a hospital shift, but hey, let's see how you respond to someone actually trying to do that for you here:

I'm pleased to hear you generally don't get that sick, but there's a lot of other people who said the exact same thing, who were really healthy, who still either got really sick and died, had to spend a lot of time in hospital to survive it, and/or were left with long term damage from it. I've got multiple friends with long COVID and it's utterly terrible, especially because it isn't clear that they're ever actually going to recover.

The problem with not getting vaccinated because you don't think it'll be much of an issue if you're infected, even aside from impacts on anyone else or making it easier for the virus to come up with new mutation inside you, is that by the time you're infected and very sick, it's too late to get vaccinated, and considering how super infectious Delta is, it's more a case of when, rather than if, you'll get infected by it.

As I've now said something like 3 times in this thread, the authorised vaccines are not "experiments" anymore because hundreds of thousands of people joined clinical trials to test them, the first ones starting roughly 16 months ago, and the phase 3 results being peer-reviewed and published last year (Pfizer, Moderna) and early this year (J&J). All they're still checking with those trial participants now is how long the protection lasts, as there really isn't any kind of biological mechanism that could cause a side effect to occur after a few months. Here's a thread from an immunologist on this, and an article from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia that goes over how it’s never taken more than about 2 months for a side effect to occur after vaccination.

While I get that people can be unsure about new technology, the fears around the mRNA vaccines aren't well founded, partly because of the sheer amount of data we have on how safe and effective they are, but also because the way they, and mRNA itself, works, the mRNA itself is only in your system for a few days. It's literally destroyed by the enzymes in your cells once the ribosomes have read it, and even if it wasn't, mRNA is a super fragile thing that quickly breaks down naturally in your body anyway. I mean Pfizer has to be stored frozen at -70C (-94F), and once a dose has been mixed up for use, it has to be used within 6 hours or thrown away because it'll have degraded too much to be effective. Now remember your body is normally around 37C (98F). As such, one of the key challenges with these vaccines was just getting the mRNA to last long enough to get into some cells and get to the ribosomes without being destroyed first.

They have been incredibly thoroughly tested, all of them are definitely vaccines, and all of them actually use quite a similar technique to help train your immune system, J&J and AZ just go in at a slightly higher level (conceptually) than the mRNA ones do.

If you've got any particular concerns left, go ahead and ask and I'll see if I can clarify things. I'm in a trial for a new vaccine being tested so made sure to do my research first, plus I find this stuff pretty interesting anyway.
i have found your posts very informative and easy to read and understand. i’m already vaccinated as well as my entire family but it’s nice to read such well thought information because sometimes the information overload causes me to wonder.
 
  • Love
Reactions: hop
Coincidentally, I just tripped-across this on another forum. I didn't go looking for it. It found me, you could say.


Full article: COVID Vaccine Injury Reports Jump by 27,000 in One Week as FDA Pulls ‘Bait and Switch’ With Pfizer Vaccine Approval

Anybody see any of this reported in the dominant "news" media? I haven't. (Then again, in all honesty: I rarely pay much heed to the stuff billed as "news" anymore.)
The reason you won't have seen articles about that in most of the media is that they're inaccurate and incredibly misleading. Including that within those "injury" numbers, they're going to be counting people who literally reported farting as a potential side effect.

In short, just because someone makes a report, doesn't mean that thing actually has anything to do with the treatment in question, because although the vaccines are very good at helping our immune systems to deal with the coronavirus, they obviously cannot prevent heartburn, food poisoning, cancer, flatulence, or a myriad of other bad/annoying things that can happen to people, including the reality that we all do eventually die.

As billions of doses of the authorised vaccines have been given around the word by now, including nearly 367 million in the US alone, you would obviously expect some of the people getting them to, just via bad luck, experience bad/annoying stuff; and every single one of the things I mentioned above, including flatulence, has indeed been reported by someone as something they experienced after they got vaccinated.

The key thing is that doesn’t actually mean that the vaccine *caused* those people to get food poisoning, or cancer, or fart the night away. Scientists figure that out by seeing if the number of people reporting something is higher than we’d expect by chance, which is how we found out that the Oxford/AZ vaccine slightly increases your risk (around 1 in 50,000-100,000, dying in a car accident here is around 1 in 240) of getting a (treatable) blood clot. That’s why here we switched to offering different vaccines for those who are younger than 40, as the odds are a little higher for those who are younger (1 in 50,000), and updated the info you get if you do get Oxford/AZ to tell you what the signs of a blood clot are, and to get medical attention if you experience them.
 
Oh, so we’re going to continue pretending vaccine resistance has something to do with science? Why can’t people at least just be honest and say “I’m refusing to be vaccinated because it’s inconsistent with my politics”? I’d appreciate at least dropping the pretense.
If you want to make it political by refusing to look at both sides of the science, then that is on you. But that approach is not really an enlightened approach. I am, however, sure it makes you feel better and does not require much effort. Just sit on the couch and watch your propaganda (uhh, I mean news.)

It takes a lot of effort to resist the mainstream media and people would not be doing it unless there was some very valid reasons to do it. I know you think your politics are the smart politics and everyone else is just dumb, but, you really think it is that simple? You think that people are willing to lose their jobs and friends just to support a political candidate. You must be really superior.

On the other hand you seem pretty weak. There is no way you would resist losing your job or friends just to have an alternative thought or belief. Remember, all of the progress from the 60s, 70s, and 80s came from dissidents, not the mainstream, politically correct. You are now the mainstream, politically correct and are being used.

Hopefully, you'll figure it out eventually.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.