Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Exactly.

And even if you're in a 5G community... will it work indoors?

I remember when Verizon and AT&T invited reviewers to the first 5G rollout cities... but all they could do is stand on the street corner, outdoors within sight of the antenna, doing speedtests.

If there was a tree between you and the antenna... you lose your 5G signal. And it certainly doesn't go through glass or walls, either.

So I have no idea how this is supposed to scale beyond a few blocks downtown.

Granted... Verizon and AT&T are using high-frequency mmWave technology for their 5G that has these distance and penetration limitations.

Perhaps T-Mobile and their 600MHz 5G will be better. Who knows.

But I read an article that said even if you have a 5G phone in a 5G area... you'll probably remain on 4G most, if not all, of the time.

So personally... I'm not too concerned about my next phone having 5G. Or maybe the next phone after that.
This! It sums up the hype pretty good.
 
Makes sense, at a time where 5G might actually be useful. Smart by Apple not to rush like the rest of the phone companies out there.
Some people are natural born haters and they're willing to ignore that just to have a reason to bash Apple. Pitiful.
 
Even if the 5G rollout on T-Mobile is only window dressing by next fall I’m going to upgrade to whatever the flagship phone is. Will still keep my X until then.

Buying now unless you have a burning need doesn’t make sense if you plan to keep your phone for years.
 
What you're going to discover, is 5G makes absolutely zero difference to your life with regards to your phone,

correct. the only notable difference is the lack of native voice service on 5GNR. until VoNR (the native 5G voice service) is rolled out all the voice calls will be on VoLTE, so essentially the 5G phone shall have a 4G radio in operation to be able to receive phone calls. while regular phone calls seem to be a legacy thing, still the most revenue of the MNOs come from this segment.

the notable difference however will be the crappy 5G battery life as the price is paid in watts for the complex modulation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sideshowuniqueuser
Perhaps T-Mobile and their 600MHz 5G will be better. Who knows.

spectral efficiency has its limits. on 3.5GHz, MNOs can have continuous 100MHz chunks where they can put out serious speed (still questionable who needs that much though).
on 600MHz TMUS has 35MHz of spectrum, so even the theoretical throughput will be quite lower.

the other thing with 600MHz is the propagation. it is so good, that a single cell can stretch to cover a larger area, so more UEs will connect to the same cell, i.e. the available airtime/bandwidth will be distributed among more devices. and due to its better propagation characteristics it needs more effective interference mitigation.

the point is, that the 5G hype train publicly never really discussed specifics, like how different a NR modulation will perform in different bands. and people are waiting for 5GNR performance that is only possible on 20GHz+ mmWave spectrum but coverage and propagation properties of the sub-800MHz bands. some disappointment is on the way.

as for the window story: seen internal tests with low-E windows, no 5G reception on band 42, while LTE on lower bands was performing fine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Scrip
Do you not read?

"We now believe that all three new 2H20 iPhone models will support 5G for the following reasons."

I'm sorry. Do you DENY that the sentence I quoted exists in the article?
I pointed out (in what I hoped was a somewhat amusing and friendly manner) that the sentence as present is silly and likely incorrect.
I don't see what value your complaint adds. The whole POINT of my post was that I'm well aware the sentence I HIGHLIGHTED is probably incorrect.
 
Verizon advertises that they are the official 5G provider for the NFL and every stadium has 5G in the US. But most of the people who have 5G capable phones have said they only get 4G in NFL stadiums.
5G is just not ready for mainstream yet.

Exactly.

If Verizon can't cover a building with 5G (albeit a large building) how will they cover a suburb? Or 100,000 miles of highways?

A mile is 5,280 feet. But these Verizon 5G nodes have an effective range of only 300 feet. So it seems like a fantasy that Verizon's 5G will ever have the same coverage as their 4G.

I've written at length in another comment in this thread, so I'm not gonna go into it again here.

But my prediction is even in a few years... you could have a 5G phone in a supposed 5G area... but you'll likely be on 4G most of the time.

And that's honestly fine with me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
Verizon advertises that they are the official 5G provider for the NFL and every stadium has 5G in the US.
But most of the people who have 5G capable phones have said they only get 4G in NFL stadiums.
5G is just not ready for mainstream yet.
[automerge]1573821475[/automerge]

to back up what you said....

View attachment 877248




Then there is this. https://www.statista.com/statistics/258597/global-apple-and-samsung-smartphone-shipments-by-model/

The Samsung A10, which costs $129 vs $699, according to statista shipped half as much.

Granted this is only for the first half of 2019 vs Aug for Gartner, but if you break it down by model, and there is plenty of documentation out there (but who knows how accurate), the cheaper Samsung phones are the best sellers.

One can play the how to cut the smartphone market game any which way.
 
Then there is this. https://www.statista.com/statistics/258597/global-apple-and-samsung-smartphone-shipments-by-model/

The Samsung A10, which costs $129 vs $699, according to statista shipped half as much.

Granted this is only for the first half of 2019 vs Aug for Gartner, but if you break it down by model, and there is plenty of documentation out there (but who knows how accurate), the cheaper Samsung phones are the best sellers.

One can play the how to cut the smartphone market game any which way.
not really the post I quoted was referring to sales. Not anything else. Don't try to bring anything else into the mix to deflect what was was said. Samsung sells more phones than anyone else. They are followed by Huawei and then Apple in third place. Then as the data reflects...Apple sales are declining. Those are facts.....

1573821406118-png.877248


 
Considering there is zero trust in what CPC Huawei does with user data, I believe that will be an accurate prediction.
 
not really the post I quoted was referring to sales. Not anything else. Don't try to bring anything else into the mix to deflect what was was said. Samsung sells more phones than anyone else. They are followed by Huawei and then Apple in third place. Then as the data reflects...Apple sales are declining. Those are facts.....

1573821406118-png.877248


This is a finer breakdown, don’t spin it any other way. It shows Samsung ships much more volume of less expensive phones globally than Apple, but the XR by model is the best selling global phone. That is a fact, according to statista.
 
This is a finer breakdown, don’t spin it any other way. It shows Samsung ships much more volume of less expensive phones globally than Apple, but the XR by model is the best selling global phone. That is a fact, according to statista.
That was not what was discussed and you know that.
So what if Samsung or anyone else sells more less expensive phones? That was not part of the discussion.
The topic that you jumped in was sales. The facts are here below. You can try to dilute the facts any which way you want. Or pick a model and say one iphone model sells better than one Samsung model.
But that doesn't change the facts.

A sale is a sale...no matter what the sale price...it still counts as a sale.

1573821406118-png.877248


 
That was not what was discussed and you know that.
So what if Samsung or anyone else sells more less expensive phones? That was not part of the discussion.
The topic that you jumped in was sales. The facts are here below. You can try to dilute the facts any which way you want. Or pick a model and say one iphone model sells better than one Samsung model.
But that doesn't change the facts.

A sale is a sale...no matter what the sale price...it still counts as a sale.

1573821406118-png.877248


It's not a matter of "so-what" if Samsung sells a boat-load of cheaper phones, it's very relevant to understanding the total picture that market share and units(sales) aren't the be-all and end-all of metrics.

Knowing the XR is the best selling global phone, doesn't change that fact.
 
It's not a matter of "so-what" if Samsung sells a boat-load of cheaper phones, it's very relevant to understanding the total picture that market share and units(sales) aren't the be-all and end-all of metrics.

Knowing the XR is the best selling global phone, doesn't change that fact.
doesn't change the fact that Apple is third in global smartphones now does it?
That the cheaper iPhone is the best seller kinda contradicts your position on Samsung only selling cheaper phones now doesn't it :oops: :oops:;)

1573821406118-png.877248
 
People may cry what 5G, why 5G where is 5G etc... but whether you like it or not 5G is already there. All future mobiles whether Android or iOS, will have 5G including iPhones! At that point people will definitely look down at 4G mobiles (especially expensive ones) or its resale value will be measured accordingly, hence those who are planning for upgrade next year make wise decision.... When 5G mobiles come you still can use 4G not vice versa..

That’s why I went with iPhone 11
 
  • Like
Reactions: jamezr
doesn't change the fact that Apple is third in global smartphones now does it?
That the cheaper iPhone is the best seller kinda contradicts your position on Samsung only selling cheaper phones now doesn't it :oops: :oops:;)

1573821406118-png.877248
Also a doesn’t change the fact the xr is the best selling model globally. Selling twice as many units for a phone that next in line costs nearly 6 times less.
 
Also a doesn’t change the fact the xr is the best selling model globally. Selling twice as many units for a phone that next in line costs nearly 6 times less.
I don't know why you continue to try to deflect or change the subject.
The post that started this with you was about sales. Samsung sells more phones globally than anyone else.

As usual you want to change the narrative and focus away from anything that depicts Apple as not coming out on top.....

But here are the facts...I will keep posting them for you so there is no misunderstanding.....

1573821406118-png.877248
 
I don't know why you continue to try to deflect or change the subject.
The post that started this with you was about sales. Samsung sells more phones globally than anyone else.

As usual you want to change the narrative and focus away from anything that depicts Apple as not coming out on top.....

But here are the facts...I will keep posting them for you so there is no misunderstanding.....

1573821406118-png.877248
Appreciate your reiteration. But to make sure there is no confusion, within the framework of Samsung selling more phones globally, they are inexpensive models as documented here:

 
Appreciate your reiteration. But to make sure there is no confusion, within the framework of Samsung selling more phones globally, they are inexpensive models as documented here:

again...stick to the subject...which was Samsung sells more phones than anyone globally.
Then the sales are sales.....not specific models....just sales.
Here are the facts again for you....

1573821406118-png.877248
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.