Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That sounds like some incredibly clever technology, to be able to ‘print’ the touch screen circuitry onto the OLED panel. I don’t think Apple will pass the cost savings in though, but maybe it will help prevent the new iPhone having a higher price tag.
 
5.4" is for women--and my wife, all her friends will be very happy with that. Not all but a significant % of women have been clamoring for smaller phones--if its all screen--it'd be about the perfect size
Women want something that fits in their hand easier and don't have the phone needs that men do.
quite on the opposite, women tend to prefer bigger phones (they have a purse most of the time to carry it).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I understand people that want smaller phones, but you really need a PRO iPhone, but smaller? What's the point? I believe that anything below 5.8" is hard to use for web browsing, compose a good photo, watch videos, messaging with several people...if you want a "feature" phone, (like the SE2 would be) it makes sense for me. An iOS running phone for calls and few things more, not for consuming content or any "PRO" usage...
 
Virtually no one outside of Apple wants thinner phone. BATTERY LIFE is our main concern.

I think you’ll probably find that the majority would like both, which is why all makers try to strike a balance that pleases the most users whilst upsetting the least. Not many consumers want a 1” thick phone that pulls their trousers down, and most are ok with charging overnight.

iPhones have been getting thicker since the 6, but ‘virtually no one’ besides battery zealots on tech forums wants them to be thicker than they are wide, so let’s not get too carried away. Apple will continue to make phones that please the majority. The majority do not want thick & heavy, and so we find ourselves where we are today - a happy medium.
 
  • Like
Reactions: drinkingtea
quite on the opposite, women tend to prefer bigger phones (they have a purse most of the time to carry it).

Yup, my wife wanted a smaller phone, but since even the 4.7" phones of old are too big for most women's pockets, she went ahead and got the iPhone 8+ since it was going to be in her purse either way.

I understand people that want smaller phones, but you really need a PRO iPhone, but smaller? What's the point? I believe that anything below 5.8" is hard to use for web browsing, compose a good photo, watch videos, messaging with several people...if you want a "feature" phone, (like the SE2 would be) it makes sense for me. An iOS running phone for calls and few things more, not for consuming content or any "PRO" usage...

Web browsing, watching videos, and messaging are "PRO" use cases now? Let's be real here, most professionals aren't using their phones for anything related to their trade except for taking calls and answering emails. Professionals are using DSLRs, high-end 4K/8K HDR video cameras, and professional reference monitors for grading. Nothing significantly changed between the Xs and the 11 "Pro" to actually make it useful for most actual professionals, so don't fool yourself into thinking that it's anything more than a new naming convention for iPhones.

And yes, anything below 5.8" is too hard to watch videos and send messages on. How did we ever get by with the 5.5" screens of the former 'Plus' phones. And the 3.5" screens of the early iphones, oh my...
 
in case anyone missed it, this is the trend since iPhone 6, the thinnest iPhone ever:
Screenshot 2019-11-27 at 16.47.41.png


Happy if Apple reverse the trend, especially on weight.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dellaster
You can betcha that the price of the phone is still gonna go up or stay the same tho :)

Although the price might be lower for the screen, other costs increase, such as the 5nm ARM SoC, RAM increase (potentially), ToF, higher material cost, new FaceID sensors (potentially), further camera improvements, further speaker improvements (potentially), etc. This isn't even including non-hardware costs such as IOS development, employee costs (developers, customer service, etc), third-party shipping costs (shipping business employee costs), physical store costs, etc. None of this is free.
 
Virtually no one outside of Apple wants thinner phone. BATTERY LIFE is our main concern.

It does seem counter-intuitive on Apple’s part to make phones thinner and fragile that one has to put a screen protector and case. Depending on phone generation a battery case is required which in turn makes the device thicker and heavier. Go figure and some will say only get the extra battery case if you need it.
 
meh. First gen for a lot of stuff. The 2021 will be the "S" year (or the tock year) where all the irritating parts of the 2020 are worked out.
Every non "S" year iPhone hasn't aged as well as a 2nd gen "S" year phone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fredrik9 and smulji
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.