Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Don’t have time to read 400 replies unfortunately, but it seems like a bit of a pointless discussion.

1) nobody here knows the actual reasons for why iPhone 7 is not supported.
2) iPhone 7 users are no worse off than when they bought their phones.
3) this happens every year and is normal.
Some communication chip has no further SDK updates so they cut it. I think in this instance it's because of the older Bluetooth 4.2 in the iPhone 7 versus the Bluetooth 5 in the iPhone 8. In other apple laptops that was what cause a model to be cut in the past.

Compared to Bluetooth 4.2, Bluetooth 5 has:
  • 2x the data rate
  • 4x the range
  • 8x the broadcast capability
  • Lower Power Consumption
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlexMac89 and grjj
I don't understand the whole "Apple is forcing me to upgrade" thing.
Your iPhone 7 still does everything it did when you bought it, at the same speed and you can keep on using it exactly as it is now.

If you want the new cool features (that not even some of the newer iPhones support) or you want more speed then you need to upgrade. There is not "force" here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexMac89 and mk313
I agree. Shame on Apple for this move, this is the kind of thing that make me wanna switch to Android.
That’s ironic.
Apple not allowing the latest feature update of iOS to run on 6-7 year old devices makes you want to move to Android, an OS that *checks notes* only recently started guaranteeing somewhere between three and four years, about half of what Apple does, of updates.
 
Don’t have time to read 400 replies unfortunately

I guess maybe don’t drop in and ask a question that’s already been answered if you can’t be bothered to read anything that’s already been said?

You don’t have to read very far in the thread to get many replies to your exact questions/points
 
That’s ironic.
Apple not allowing the latest feature update of iOS to run on 6-7 year old devices makes you want to move to Android, an OS that *checks notes* only recently started guaranteeing somewhere between three and four years, about half of what Apple does, of updates.
And that’s only the big players in Android. There’s tons of Android devices where you simply have no guarantee and, if you root your phone and you’re lucky, some kind soul may port the current OS to your device. I’ve owned multiple Android devices (some less than 3 years old) that are still running the same version of Android they shipped with (well one is one where one of those kind souls I mentioned maintains a port of more recent Android versions for it, and I’ve rooted and installed a newer Android version on it). Some manufacturers even use the latest version of Android as part of the carrot they dangle in front of you to upgrade devices!
 
  • Love
Reactions: AlexMac89
So you are complaining that Apple does not support your phones and you will not be able to change the font on the lock-screen on your 6-year-old smartphone? Wow... You still can use your old OS guys. Or switch to Android and have a problem with having even one update on most models.

And do not write that the phone was sold three years ago, following this line of reasoning, we can say that work on it began 8 years ago, so they resign from adapting the software to the hardware that they began work on in 2014.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexMac89


Apple is facing backlash from users after it announced that iOS 16, its next major release of iOS destined for release this fall, will not be supported by the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

iphone75colors-800x438.jpg

iOS 16 will bring major changes and customization features to the Lock Screen, much-awaited changes in iMessage such as mark as unread and message edits, and so much more.

Users have long asked Apple to give them more personalization controls on iOS, and Apple is finally doing that with iOS 16. Unfortunately, all of iOS 16's new features, including the update itself, won't be coming to customers who own many older iPhones, with the most notable being the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

apple-iphone7.jpg

As a refresher, the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus were released in September 2016. The iPhone 7 Plus was the first iPhone to feature a dual-lens camera setup, and both models were the first to get rid of the physical Home button and replace it with a Haptic one. The iPhone 7 also marked the end of the headphone jack.

With iOS 15, Apple supported devices as old as the second-generation iPhone SE, including the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. While it was expected that iOS 16 would drop support for the iPhone 6S, iPhone 6S Plus, and the now-discontinued iPod touch, surprisingly, Apple also dropped support for the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus.

Following Monday's WWDC keynote, iPhone 7 users shared their disapproval online over the lack of support for the upcoming release of iOS. "Wow. Surprised they ditched the 7/7+," one user wrote on the MacRumors Forums. Other customers voiced complaints on Twitter.



The reasonable explanation is that the A10 Fusion chip in the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus is simply not powerful enough to run iOS 16 and all its new features. That explanation, though, is invalidated when the sixth and seventh-generation iPad, both powered by the same A10 Fusion chip, are supported by iPadOS 16.

Furthermore, the fifth-generation iPad, which features the less powerful A9 chip compared to the A10 Fusion chip in the iPhone 7, is also supported by iPadOS 16. While iOS and iPadOS are different, they also share many of the same features and the same underlying technology.

In theory, Apple could have supported the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus with iOS 16 but just disabled some of the CPU and ML-heavy features for newer models.

By doing so, iPhone 7 users would still benefit from performance and security enhancements offered by iOS 16, as well as small refinements like the ability to edit iMessages, which don't require an intense amount of CPU work.

Offering only newer devices certain features that aren't available to older models is not something new, and a practice Apple is long accustomed to. As a matter of fact, several of iOS 16's latest features will only work with iPhones powered by the A12 Bionic and later.

As MacRumors reported in May, it was plausible that due to the higher memory on the iPhone 7 Plus, it would retain support for iOS 16, while the iPhone 7 would miss out. It seems as though, to avoid any possible confusion, Apple has just entirely dropped support for both iPhone 7 models instead of supporting one and not the other.

We've reached out to Apple to comment on why the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus won't be receiving iOS 16 and we'll update this article if we hear back.

Article Link: Apple Faces User Backlash After Dropping Support for iPhone 7 From iOS 16
Six year old technology purchased three years ago is still six year old technology.
 
And do not write that the phone was sold three years ago

It’s relevant

When Apple keeps selling something as brand new, the customer rightfully has expectations of what that means about longevity.

It’s not up to customers to worry about internal technical details and what that might infer for long term support, usage and longevity concerns.

Apple is supposed to be the tech company that very specifically doesn’t create that issue for consumers.
 
I wonder why did the iPhone 6s get one extra year of support compared to iPhone 7 despite being an older and less powerful device, especially when iOS 16 has no issues running not just on A10, but on A9 as well? I'd be fine if Apple killed 6s today and 7 next year with iOS 17, but what they did instead is just scummy.
The 6S being kept a year longer is the outlier, They did the same thing with the 5S. In both cases the year they normally would have gotten axed from new iOS support they had a year where “Everything that runs the current iOS runs the new iOS”. Then the following year, both the 5S and 6 got axed. Now they did the same thing with the 6S and 7. Basically, this is the normal support length and the 5S/6S support lengths were the exception. Same outrage happened when the 6 got axed from iOS 13. I’m more concerned with how quickly they are phasing out the Macs now with the transition to AS. They phased out the PowerPC stuff too quickly back in the day on the switch to Intel too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexMac89
It’s relevant

When Apple keeps selling something as brand new, the customer rightfully has expectations of what that means about longevity.

It’s not up to customers to worry about internal technical details and what that might infer for long term support, usage and longevity concerns.

Apple is supposed to be the tech company that very specifically doesn’t create that issue for consumers.
The absolute mental gymnastics at the concept that if something is sold "as new" is referring to the product being "newly released" versus "not previously used".
 
The absolute mental gymnastics at the concept that if something is sold "as new" is referring to the product being "newly released" versus "not previously used".

No clue what you are talking about.

Apple was selling them brand new to customers in 2019

No mental gymnastics needed

Apple customers shouldn’t need to play a game of “what if” when they walk in to an Apple Store and see the new phone options and make a purchase
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AlexMac89
No clue what you are talking about.

Apple was selling them brand new to customers in 2019

No mental gymnastics needed

Apple customers shouldn’t need to play a game of “what if” when they walk in to an Apple Store and see the new phone options and make a purchase
Sir or madam,

If you cannot comprehend the difference between buying newly released technology and three year old technology, then the problem doesn't lie with the seller, but with your mental deficiencies as the buyer for being unable to factor in the simple knowledge that, the device you are buying has already been at market for three years.
 
  • Love
Reactions: AlexMac89
Apple customers shouldn’t need to play a game of “what if” when they walk in to an Apple Store and see the new phone options and make a purchase
Those buyers will not even know their phone won’t support iOS 16. As long as their phone continues working they’ll be happy.
 
The iPhone 7 doesn't have the necessary hardware required for the lock screen part of iOS16, and maybe even some other parts, which is why it isn't supported.
Users have been saying, I even said it, that if there are parts of the OS that aren't supported, it's understandable. However, the parts that are should be released as the processor clearly supports them.
 
Six year old technology purchased three years ago is still six year old technology.

That is not something Apple customers should ever have to worry about, especially iPhone customers.

If Apple are going to behave like this, they should be exceptionally up front about lifespans of support right at the time of purchase, very prominently advertising it alongside the other key features.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AlexMac89
No clue what you are talking about.

Apple was selling them brand new to customers in 2019

No mental gymnastics needed

Apple customers shouldn’t need to play a game of “what if” when they walk in to an Apple Store and see the new phone options and make a purchase
They don’t need to do any “what ifs”. They buy a phone with the features it comes with. Any new features in the future are a bonus that is not guaranteed for eternity. The concept of “time” and “age” is applicable to everything in life, even iPhone 7.
 
  • Love
Reactions: AlexMac89
Well yes, of course, but you can always slice and dice data about it to give an estimated lifespan of new hardware based on historic data, and the average or the mean based on historic data is what I described as “the norm”.
You can slice and dice as much as you want. However, the fact remains that the A10 can handle some of the new features.
 
Sir or madam,

If you cannot comprehend the difference between buying newly released technology and three year old technology, then the problem doesn't lie with the seller, but with your mental deficiencies as the buyer for being unable to factor in the simple knowledge that, the device you are buying has already been at market for three years.
Sorry, but all I can think of in response to your post is laughter.
But I will try. You know perfectly well that Apple can easily introduce ios 16 on iPhone 7. Will it have limited functions due to older technology? Yes of course. Like the iPhone 10, it does not have everything that the iPhone 11 and 11 have everything 12, and 12 everything that is 13, etc. It's about the fact that the iPhone 6s for some reason is privileged over 7. This is a dangerous precedent because you have no warranty at Apple for the obvious fact that a younger device is supported longer. And no matter what generation of the iPhone we are talking about.
 
Last edited:
“…just by disabling some features…”. You have idea of software development. Is not as easy. And keep support 6 years old device will slowdown the development of new features by having to support 2 or more software branches.
Just switch to Android and experience the lack of updates. Then switch back to a recent iphone.
 
Sorry, but all I can think of in response to your post is laughter.
But I will try. You know perfectly well that Apple can easily introduce ios 16 on iPhone 7. Will it have limited functions due to older technology? Yes of course. Like the iPhone 10, it does not have everything that the iPhone 11 and 11 have everything 12, and 12 everything that is 13, etc. It's about the fact that the iPhone 6s for some reason is privileged over 7. This is a dangerous precedent because you have no warranty at Apple for the obvious fact that a younger device is supported longer. And no matter what generation of the iPhone we are talking about.
Sorry, but all I can think of in response to your post is laughter.
But I will try. You know perfectly well that Apple can easily introduce ios 16 on iPhone 7. Will it have limited functions due to older technology? Yes of course. Like the iPhone 10, it does not have everything that the iPhone 11 and 11 have everything 12, and 12 everything that is 13, etc. It's about the fact that the iPhone 6s for some reason is privileged over 7. This is a dangerous precedent because you have no warranty at Apple for the obvious fact that a younger device is supported longer. And no matter what generation of the iPhone we are talking about.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: AlexMac89
No clue what you are talking about.

Apple was selling them brand new to customers in 2019

No mental gymnastics needed

Apple customers shouldn’t need to play a game of “what if” when they walk in to an Apple Store and see the new phone options and make a purchase
No one is walking into an Apple store and buying a 2-3 year old iPhone (for a hefty discount from launch price) expecting it to have the same functionality and support as "the latest".

That's like going to a car dealership and seeing the older 2021 model and the 2022 re-design next to each other on the lot. Both are being sold as "new", but no buyer expects the 2021 to get the same features and support as the 2022 model.
 
  • Love
Reactions: AlexMac89
Spoken like a true Apple executive! Why? If the phone still works, and is capable, why should anyone be forced to upgrade? Not everyone needs the greatest and latest.

If the iPhone 7 still allows these users to text, review their social media, etc, then that's great.
I don’t understand why some people would have « no sympathy » for those who are not happy with the software support drop. If you have a supported phone, go merry on your way, no need to bother yourself with how others with older devices feel. It’s pettiness to show « no sympathy » or even bother about others’ complaints. This drop doesn’t concern me or anyone in my household, but I do sympathise and understand those who have been affected by this.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.