I would go a step further. It’s one of their core businesses.You think that Trump and Elon won't use government power to dig into actions and communications of anyone who opposes them? Have you been watching them in recent years?
I would go a step further. It’s one of their core businesses.You think that Trump and Elon won't use government power to dig into actions and communications of anyone who opposes them? Have you been watching them in recent years?
Yes, it was enacted under a Conservative government. However, all but two Labour Party MPs voted for it. https://votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons/Division/80Is this really "socialist"? This law was passed during the British Conservative government administration. Authoritarian acts are means of control that extreme factions will use regardless of their position on political axes.
Aristocrats are aristocrats. When you're high enough up on the totem pole, you can get away with anything.> It was enacted to help catch terrorists and peadophiles.
Yeah wake me up when there's actual arrests of those people going on, including the members of the royal family who got a little too friendly with Epstein. Seems more like a crescendo of anarchy-tyranny.
Sorry old chap but it’s not the UK that is cosying up to totalitarian Russia. What you call socialism is merely taking care of our people and our friends. (Having said that, I completely object to this government overreach.)Dear UK, Keep your Socialist corrupt hands off of our data. - We the People.
👍 I especially like “Brits” because of their humor! Well said and thank you.😊Sorry old chap but it’s not the UK that is cosying up to totalitarian Russia.
What you call socialism is merely taking care of our people and our friends. (Having said that, I completely object to this government overreach.)
It doesn't mean it is that. Some hyperbole because some posters do not like President Trump.Does it mean it isn’t that?
Not really a smart comment when people are fired from jobs for just saying the word "gay" or being female. Books banned for including words like "gay", "non-binary" etc. When AP and Reuters are banned from White House press conferences but not TASS. Interesting to see anti-discrimination laws being repealed in certain states. Seems like speech is "free for me but not for thee."Don't they get fined for mis-gendering someone?Or go to jail for teaching their dog bad tricks?
Wasn't there a recent 60 minutes episode where they trailed a swat like team breaking down the door to someone who posted something mean online?Where do you get the idea that the U.K. has no free speech? That’s simply not true.
That was in Germany, however the UK has had their fair share of questionable arrests.Wasn't there a recent 60 minutes episode where they trailed a swat like team breaking down the door to someone who posted something mean online?
No this is just another democrat twisting a good into an evil.You're saying Trump & Apple are engaged in quid pro quo corruption?
No.. youre making up a talking point that has no basis in actual reality.You think that Trump and Elon won't use government power to dig into actions and communications of anyone who opposes them? Have you been watching them in recent years?
And its even more insane that this!It shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone following Europe’s slow descent into authoritarianism.
No they don’t. Educate yourself.Don't they get fined for mis-gendering someone?Or go to jail for teaching their dog bad tricks?
Ideologies are synonymous with morals which to me are never negotiable.Good God, seeing some of the partisan and ideological bickering here is making me lose it.
Fighting over what is causing all of the problems in western democracies is part of why much of the west is in crisis.
Instead of subscribing to a specific person or ideological checklist, think for yourself and put the interest of you and your countrymen first.
Give credit where credit is due, critique leaders when they make mistakes, and make your voice heard whenever the next elections are in your nation.
There seems to be a consensus left, right, and center on this specific issue, privacy. Take advantage of that agreement instead instead of having zero-sum arguments that fix nothing.
Whether or not someone supports a public health insurance option or certain tax law is a moral issue?Ideologies are synonymous with morals which to me are never negotiable.
All decisions are rooted in morals.Whether or not someone supports a public health insurance option or certain tax law is a moral issue?
ADP nullifies this for most things.Apple already provides iCloud data if there is a lawful request from law enforcement, why would government need back door ?
It is great that Apple is challenging this illegal order.
Apple today filed a legal complaint with the UK's Investigatory Powers Tribunal in an attempt to quash the UK government's demand for backdoor access to encrypted data, reports Financial Times.
![]()
Earlier this year, the UK government ordered Apple to give it secret access to encrypted user data uploaded to iCloud worldwide, through the creation of a backdoor. The UK used its Investigatory Powers Act to justify the demand, but Apple has not complied.
Instead, Apple removed Advanced Data Protection from the UK so that it would not have to provide the government with access to encrypted data. Advanced Data Protection is designed to provide end-to-end encryption to iPhone, iPad, and Mac users for data stored in iCloud.
Apple will undoubtedly fight the UK every step of the way in order to protect user privacy, and the legal challenge that the company filed today could be heard as soon as this month. Apple is not able to discuss the order made by the UK in public due to the terms of the law, so the court case could be heard without public notice.
Apple previously made it clear that it would pull iCloud features from the UK rather than compromise its user security, and while that only extends to Advanced Data Protection right now, it could lead to key features like FaceTime and iMessage being removed in the country. The UK wants backdoor access to iCloud data to fight terrorism and investigate child sex abuse.
Apple fights vehemently against calls for backdoor access to user data, which we saw in 2016 when the U.S. government demanded that Apple unlock the iPhone of a shooter in San Bernardino, California. That led to a long legal battle that did not see Apple compromise its security. The U.S. has lately reversed course on encryption, and has been promoting end-to-end encryption for mobile devices to protect against foreign cyber campaigns.
The U.S. government is now looking into whether the UK's demand has violated the CLOUD act, which keeps the UK from asking for data from U.S. citizens, and vice versa.
Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.
Article Link: Apple Fights UK's Demand for iCloud Data Backdoor
Do you have ANYTHING whatsoever regarding this particular issue to say that Google and M$ have or haven't done the same?Say what you want about Apple, but Microsoft and Google would have opened the door and invited them in for tea while serving up data on everyone.
Another reason I will keep buying Apple products.