Never mind these ANALysts - Looking at this mockups - the question is who would buy the $ 749 iPhone 7s plus if the new model starts at $ 849 (that would be like $ 4 dollars more on an installment plan)
Apple will probably get away starting this thing at $949-$1,049 and even at that price a lot of people will get it.
View attachment 708173
Apple could also sell a rubber pipi and charge $1199 and people will still buy it!
The customers can decide what Apple charges for a product. If people stop buying, then Apple will do something about that price!
If they're launching in September....what if they are not?Whatever Apple's solution is, they've already had it "solved" for many months now.
But then Apple has always had a history of brinkmanship on their release dates. Steve Jobs partly got his reputation for the famous Apple "reality distortion field" by covering for missed deadlines, and "uncooked, or not fully baked" release products. Even Tim Cook battled this with the early Apple Maps app.... No I think the faithful will wait, and "if they build it, they will come."
For all the rumors we've seen recently surrounding Apple's upcoming "iPhone 8", one of the most inconsistent remains the fate of its Touch ID fingerprint recognition technology in the redesigned flagship device, which is expected to launch in September.
In late May, supply chain sources suggested that Apple had overcome technical hurdles and that the OLED iPhone will have Touch ID integrated into the display. However, according to a report from KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo earlier this month, Apple plans to replace Touch ID in the iPhone 8 with a facial recognition security system - a prediction echoed by both JP Morgan analyst Rod Hall and Bloomberg.
![]()
In the latest throw of the dice, a report from investment publication Barron's concludes that Apple is still struggling to put a fingerprint sensor under the glass of its next iPhone, and that the company has "just a couple of weeks" to solve the matter before its earnings estimates are at risk.
According to KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst Andy Hargreaves, who contributed to the report, Apple has until August to either place orders for chips to run a fingerprint sensor, or miss that window and not have a fingerprint ID at all, or delay more significantly the release of the iPhone.Hargreaves considers the possibility that Apple will replace Touch ID with facial recognition "increasingly likely" as time passes, but "far from ideal". Echoing the thoughts of many observers, Hargreaves goes on to highlight the challenges a supposed replacement facial recognition security system would need to overcome to meet the standard of existing Touch ID, particularly with regard to authenticating Apple Pay.
Hargreaves concludes that if Apple thinks facial recognition isn't sufficient by itself for login and authentication, then a delay in the retail availability of the OLED iPhone is "very unlikely, but possible". But while the analyst believes a delay up until mid-November would not have an impact on investor expectations for the cycle, anything beyond that timeframe could have negative repercussions.
![]()
Alleged leaked 'iPhone 8' glass back panel via Weibo
Meanwhile, alleged leaks continue to trickle out into the social media sphere, the most recent coming today via Chinese microblogging service Weibo claiming to show an "iPhone 8" production glass panel back that has no cutout for a Touch ID fingerprint sensor. Early rumors suggested Apple would relocate the sensor to the rear of the handset, similar to the Samsung Galaxy S8.
Apple is thought to have incorporated 3D sensing technology in the forward-facing camera of its "iPhone 8", which may perform a function in the purported facial scanning feature. Alongside the redesigned OLED iPhone, Apple is also expected to announce incremental updates to the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus.
Article Link: Apple Has 'Just Weeks' to Solve iPhone 8 Touch ID Dilemma
ALL of the "reporting" on delays of the technology point towards Qualcomm's implementation, citing that as evidence that Apple is somehow behind schedule because of it.I’m not conflating anything. I’m discussing to the rumors about Apple’s unknown implementation. Don’t try to bring Qualcomm into this.
[...]expected to launch in September.
[...]In the latest throw of the dice,[...]
Article Link: Apple Has 'Just Weeks' to Solve iPhone 8 Touch ID Dilemma
It's part of the Apple drama...Its free advertising to take the deep breath, and hold it.Apple knows damn well exactly what it will be implementing in the next iteration of their iphone. No way anybody is scrambling.
I am commenting on this article. I’m not making the claim that it is true. But I am saying that Apple working on this for 2 1/2 years in no way guarantees they won’t have any problems getting one of their manufacturing partners to produce it in mass quantities and at a price Apple is willing to pay. They could work on something for longer and still not get it right. Does Apple have a record of success with every 2 1/2 year project?ALL of the "reporting" on delays of the technology point towards Qualcomm's implementation, citing that as evidence that Apple is somehow behind schedule because of it.
What rumors are you referring to? I ask because all I've seen out of the tech journalism world is what I just wrote.
You mean like they had figured out the production of the white iPhone 4 when they announced it? You don't get ahead of everybody by always playing it safe.I find this very very very hard to believe. A company of Apple's caliber probably had this figured out earlier in the year. I really don't believe they're "scrambling" to get Touch ID implemented.
You mean they are not the kind of company that would paint itself into a thermal corner with the 2013 Mac Pro?Either way, I am VERY skeptical that Apple would launch without a fp sensor, they just arent' the kind of company which would make such an idiotic move.
You mean like they had figured out the production of the white iPhone 4 when they announced it? You don't get ahead of everybody by always playing it safe.
If that's what it takes to make this technology work then why not.For Touch ID to work under the screen you have to place a camera under the screen to read your finger prints.You're "ok with the 1/4 lower half", for that to work Apple would have to fit a camera that is the same size of the 1/4 lower half of the screen instead of a little fingerprint sized sensor they use now.
Do really think space conscious Apple are going to fit such a large camera under the screen?
You mean like they had figured out the production of the white iPhone 4 when they announced it? You don't get ahead of everybody by always playing it safe.
[doublepost=1499813859][/doublepost]
You mean they are not the kind of company that would paint itself into a thermal corner with the 2013 Mac Pro?
What brands are those?Other brands already solved this, so that kind of answers this rumor speculation.
Apple had many products that weren't ready at the announcement date. Often this is just a one or two month delay but there other examples beyond the white iPhone. The Apple Watch, presented in September 2014, barely made its 'beginning of 2015' date by shipping in very small quantities in the last week of April 2015 and wasn't really available in mass before June. The 2013 Mac Pro and the 2016 Airpods also largely only nominally hit their launch window by showing up in homeopathic quantities a few days before Christmass. The Airpods thus arrived at least three month after iPhone 7 shipped one of whose marquee features was the removal of the headphone jack and the switch to Bluetooth headphones.About 10 people quoted my original post saying that is VERY much believable that Apple is currently "scrambling like a chicken with its head cut off"....
All I'm going to say is obviously we have no idea what's going on. The white iPhone 4 is an interesting example and a one off.
I can see facial recognition taking care of 90-95% of general use functions, like unlocking, etc. Even if they were able to integrate facial recognition with Apple Pay, what I'm wondering is if enthusiasts (those who would be willing to spend $1000+ on an iPhone) will be ticked off by the "gimped" phone, which they didn't succeed in being able to put Touch ID into.