Because the last time they updated the MBP "online" barely existed?
2012 was a much simpler time.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Has Received More Online Orders for New MacBook Pro Than Any Previous Generation
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
2012 was a much simpler time.
Personally I think this new approach is the one Jobs would have cursed out. Replacing an entire interface long before it is even used just because someday it will be the standard is a poor approach to the problem. Even firewire was phased out slowly long after most firewire devices were old enough to be replaced. Just because USB-C is the future and is an awesome interface does not mean that all the USB-A devices out there are instantly useless and need to be be modernized. Especially at the rate in which Apple has been adopting new interfaces. I still don't own a single pure-Lightning device.
This new model should have been a stepping stone including both C and A and maybe on the next refresh drop the A.
Agreed on all counts. My company is on a 4 year laptop upgrade cycle. Last time around (Nov 2012), I got a 16GB rMBP. Looking at activity monitor, I'm currently using ~14.5 GB (multiple Linux VMs - I develop and support software for HPC systems). There is no way a 16GB machine will work for me as an upgrade. I can probably limp along for a year, but if I can't get at least 32GB from Apple by then I'll have to look elsewhere.
The MagSafe has saved my laptop more times than I can count.
The brighter screen would be nice. The faster SSD would be nice. More RAM, however, is a necessity (and using vi is going to be a PITA without a physical ESC key).
If this underpowered "upgrade" works for you, by all means buy one and enjoy it. It doesn't work for me.
This standard port was introduced way way before 1994, and you use it every day without even thinking about it because it is a universal standard (at least in the US). You can plug in your Mac at the airport, at the library, at Starbucks, at the gym, at home and a billion (yes billion) other US locations without any adapters. Every electrical item that needs this amperage and voltage is compatible and plugs right in. Imagine if every company making electrical appliances wanted to push their own proprietary standard or keep changing the standard ever few years......
I agree that the new ports will be better someday (its a new standard!!) but compatibility out of the box is nice too. Would it have been really THAT HARD for Apple to continue making something that extends compatiblility with a legacy of 100 million computer accessories still in use?
Last edited:
This is just fantasy talk. It's about design choices. There's a whole army of Windows machines with Kaby Lake, or even quadcore kaby Lake in 2 months, in the same broad category.
Apple has shrunk the battery sized this generation. You can't make an argument about the battery drain of different CPUs or RAM when you've actively chosen to hack down your own battery size.
Truth is, Intel hasn't given enough to make updating without new functionality worthwhile. Apple won't drop their margins just to sell more, and just bumping to a different Lake inside isn't compelling for the broader market.
People have mentally correlated time since last update with improvement since last update. The silicon alone isn't living upper to that anymore. If you've waited 3 years for a new Mac Pro and Geekbench says the new one is 12% faster, how happy will you really be? At this point the best Apple can do is make sure the new one at least can drive a 5k display with a single cable.
Are you serious?
Why would you, the industry, or anyone want to change that outlet? The US 120 VAC, 60 Hz standard which has been around since the early 1900s will be around for the next 100 (or more) years. Unlike computer I/O rates which will climb along with addition of new features (daisy chasing, power support, etc.) and will need new interfaces to support those changes.
a. dont care about it not being touch screen
b. bar is probably really cool
c. his answers and perception of reality is wrong.
For a company that was all about the user experience - releasing a new laptop and not including the appropriate usb-c to lightning connector - or not allowing for an iphone 7 cable trade-in program shows that they didnt think this through.
What most PRO probably care about
1. DDR4 32GB - yes, it requires a new architecture, but this is what people are expecting.
2. 8GB video option.
the investment to release a new mac book pro that supports DDR4 and 32GB is likely the reason for not doing it - giving consumers BS that it's uses more power and thats why apple chose not to do it is lame.
b. bar is probably really cool
c. his answers and perception of reality is wrong.
For a company that was all about the user experience - releasing a new laptop and not including the appropriate usb-c to lightning connector - or not allowing for an iphone 7 cable trade-in program shows that they didnt think this through.
What most PRO probably care about
1. DDR4 32GB - yes, it requires a new architecture, but this is what people are expecting.
2. 8GB video option.
the investment to release a new mac book pro that supports DDR4 and 32GB is likely the reason for not doing it - giving consumers BS that it's uses more power and thats why apple chose not to do it is lame.
Hey Apple guys, if you read that, why would you make most of your customers happy with port customization. Same like you do with storage and RAM. Some need SD card reader build in, others 2 USB -A ports, others HDMI port etc. Offer 3-4 basic configurations and keep everyone happy. Lets face it: dongles are annoying and never there when you need one. And new Iphone not connecting with new MacBook - let's face it - it's not cool regardless how you try to sell it. Love you and hate you at the same time. Keep my $2000 in my pocket for now. Your loyal customer.
Except it wouldn't because they are still charging pro prices for non-pro machines.
!00% agree with this. Apple has a responsibility to help its customers transition to new tech as well as pushing new standards like USB C. It has done a poor job here.
What? You have a direct AC-to-lightning cable? A direct AC-to-USB-C cable? Most portable electronics require adapters to plug into wall outlets. You're just more used to it.
I thought it was because the Internet didn't exist the last time they updated the macbook pro
You can also use one of these slim inline adapters with your existing iPhone Lightening cable. $9 at Monoprice, or you can get two of a highly reviewed adapter on Amazon for $8. No doubt white versions will soon be available to blend in with your Lightening cable.
Er... because I have a gazillion USB A devices and have no desire to have to plug a dongle in every time I want to use one! It was easy for Apple to make a transitional MB Pro that had USB A and C and it could have been out 6 months ago!
Just here to throw in an amen to the Michael Tsai piece, in case someone from Apple is counting.
sure sure sure and the iPhone 7 sold 3xiphone 6s, but then the earnings call comes and... ups!
And again this confirms that the delusional complainer on MacRumors forums has not much to do with the reality. I'm looking forward to my new 2016 15" and hope that Apple keeps up their excellent work in the future.
P.S. I'd too be surprised if I put literally the fastest available CPU and GPU (within reasonable thermal design spec) into my new laptop and then an angry mob tells me that I 'don't care about performance'
At least make them all quad cores and increase the standard HD sizes if you're going to charge so much dammit..