Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, the storage is much less of a concern IMO. Even the iPad 10 comes with 64 GB. If the iPad 11 comes with 128 GB, that means 1 GB more is less than 1%. If the iPad 11 comes with 64 GB, that's still only 1.6%. OTOH, I'm predicting the iPad 11 will get at least 50% more RAM, and possibly even 100% more RAM. The current iPad 10 only has 4 GB RAM, and I am predicting the iPad 11 will get 6-8 GB RAM.
uncompressed size is bigger, and someone posted a screenshot showing Apple Intelligence occupying an additional 2-3 GB of space with the feature disabled, and that's not counting the space supporting code takes up (which would be counted under "System")
 
No, I meant the average person (layman) thinks AI in general is a gimmick or, like I said, don't fully understand the use cases. I haven't used Apple Intelligence personally, nor do I have an interest in it in its current state, but I do use chatGPT and other forms of AI. AI is a tool and can be incredibly powerful if used appropriately. If people don't know how to use that tool properly, then there is no reason for them to really get excited for any version of AI. In Apple's case specifically, they have released a half baked system that doesn't even have all of the promised features yet. The market is also becoming incredibly saturated with apps and services with an AI label, so that doesn't help either.

Edit: that also wasn't the main point of my comment. I think a larger reason for the lack of upgrades is what I said in the rest of the comment.
Sorry for misunderstanding your post. Apple Intelligence in the state where it is today is a complete flop and has almost nothing to do with AI whatsoever already possible om competing devices. Apple is giving AI a bad name this way.
 
With the current set of Apple Intelligence features, there is nothing great to consider switching to an iPhone or even upgrading to one with it. But over time, these small but useful features should add up and improve the overall experience of owning a device with Apple Intelligence.
By the time it’s useful on Apple … what year are we taking about and for how long will useful AI already be available on competing devices? Apple has to either lower their prices of quadruple down on useful features to compete. I think it will be peak iPhone from now on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I fail to see any use of AI yet. As the result can be totally fake or stupid everything needs to be checked by some qualified human (me) before using it. And AI has no access to current data but only to internet filed stuff up to some deadline. It fails to be creative or forward looking. It creates some facade but not actual content. Like a filmset.

Still, I expect many companies and governments to move a lot of administrative work and low level decision making to AI for cost reasons. The user and customer will pay for this by getting wrong or bad decisions, however without much delay. It will be fun.

And how about privacy? Your devices will run day and night datamining your private files to profile you for other guys commercial purposes.
 
New button is useless, AI is in Beta and not available worldwide. Basically iPhone 16 ProMax is almost the same as 15 Pro Max.
Hopefully iPhone 17 ProMax will have new practical things.

PS: owner of 16PM here
 


Apple Intelligence hasn't convinced people to buy an iPhone 16, Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo said today. According to Kuo, a supply chain survey suggests Apple Intelligence is not pushing people to upgrade their devices.

apple-intelligence-black.jpeg

The delay between the Apple Intelligence introduction in June 2024 and a launch even after iPhone 16 models came out was a contributing factor, and Apple Intelligence "appeal has significantly declined" compared to cloud-based services like ChatGPT.

There is also no indication that Apple Intelligence will drive Services revenue, as Apple CEO Tim Cook said in December that Apple has never discussed charging for Apple Intelligence. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said that Apple could start charging for Apple Intelligence in 2027 or beyond, but it remains to be seen if that will happen.

All in all, Kuo does not feel that Apple Intelligence is going to benefit Apple in terms of user upgrades or revenue, but there's some hope for the long-term prospects.

Apple Intelligence was the main focus of iOS 18, but when the iPhone 16 models launched in September, there were no Apple Intelligence features available. Writing Tools and other capabilities came in the first update to iOS 18 in October, but Image Playground and Genmoji didn't roll out until December.

There are still Apple Intelligence features that have not been implemented, including major changes to Siri that are rumored to be coming in April.

A December survey suggested that many iPhone users feel that Apple Intelligence has added little or no value to their iPhone experience, though that sentiment could change as Apple Intelligence matures.

Article Link: Apple Intelligence Isn't Driving iPhone Upgrades
Apple intelligence is a nothingburger. It isn't intuitive; heck, I can't even tell you how to turn it on or off. For that matter, Grammarly on my iPhone, which barely works on the keyboard, is better, which isn't saying much. There is too much hype and not enough substance. Why make it the subject of the update when the implementation is terrible?
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
AI's potential is so huge and vast, and the implications are so big that we cannot comprehend what the impact will be. AI, which is, in part, basically automating your behavioural patterns and combined with the knowledge of the rest of the world, will be added to your day. It will help in the future with everything you do on a computer or with a computer.
Maybe not yet. But in the future, for certain.
I think that Apple's AI approach is one of the better approaches. It prioritizes privacy and helps its users. All the others are doing it to maximise profit by stealing from the web without licensing and training their models on everything. Apple is training your LLM on your data for you, which is why the 8GB limit is there. The models are not trained yet. That takes time. And when they are trained for you, they will work.
I have no proof or cannot see if an LLM is already being trained in the memory of an iPhone or Mac, but I think that could be the case. And when the tools are available, the model is, too.
So, the full benefit will be available in a while.
 
AI's potential is so huge and vast, and the implications are so big that we cannot comprehend what the impact will be. AI, which is, in part, basically automating your behavioural patterns and combined with the knowledge of the rest of the world, will be added to your day. It will help in the future with everything you do on a computer or with a computer.
Maybe not yet. But in the future, for certain.
I think that Apple's AI approach is one of the better approaches. It prioritizes privacy and helps its users. All the others are doing it to maximise profit by stealing from the web without licensing and training their models on everything. Apple is training your LLM on your data for you, which is why the 8GB limit is there. The models are not trained yet. That takes time. And when they are trained for you, they will work.
I have no proof or cannot see if an LLM is already being trained in the memory of an iPhone or Mac, but I think that could be the case. And when the tools are available, the model is, too.
So, the full benefit will be available in a while.
I do not see any help from Apple Intelligence at the moment. Siri doesn’t use it anyway it’s just a re-route of “look what I’ve found on the internet” to “you want me to use ChatGPT for that” while others already implemented the things rumored for iOS 19. Apple at the moment is only using hooks to software that’s freely available to anyone and is barely using things developed on their own. So why you think privacy is such a big deal on iPhone while it’s using Google search, google glass, ChatGPT and many others to come up with half baked results? You probably argue that the request you make on your iPhone will be encrypted and third party software can’t tell who’s asking and making a profile of you. They’ve found ways to do so long time ago.
 
And that’s why all Apple marketing efforts were put up at the introduction of the iPhone 16. It was the AI device to get… hello Apple Intelligence 😂

I think it’s common knowledge that Apple Intelligence is a complete flop by now. So yes… it won’t be the driver to get an iPhone 16. 😊

I agree. Within MR which is an echo chamber apple intelligence is a flop. In the real world I see people using it. I’m using it to see how it can be integrated into things I do on the iPhone.
 
I’ve been in Web development for two decades and even I have a limited use for “generated images”

As a Web Developer myself, the concept of generated images sounded attractive until I saw what people was doing with it. I'll concede that it *could* be interesting and useful, but I also know what the average user is like and I'd just end up with sites totally overpowered with dreck.
 
Last edited:
How could it drive sales? Apple Intelligence is not available in most parts of the world. Maybe its coverage & features improve by the time iPhone 17 is out.

iPhone 18 will probably be the "time to jump on Apple Intelligence" sweet spot. Though it begs the question how far ahead Apple's competitors are by then, and where AI stands in general.

Seems that when all else fails, or when Apple has to play catch-up, they return to their time-old recipe of thinness as "innovation". That makes me think they really are all out of ideas.

I skipped iPhone 16 – and I hardly ever skip on new release. I just saw no point in upgrading from my iPhone 15 PM.
 
I do not see any help from Apple Intelligence at the moment. Siri doesn’t use it anyway it’s just a re-route of “look what I’ve found on the internet” to “you want me to use ChatGPT for that” while others already implemented the things rumored for iOS 19. Apple at the moment is only using hooks to software that’s freely available to anyone and is barely using things developed on their own. So why you think privacy is such a big deal on iPhone while it’s using Google search, google glass, ChatGPT and many others to come up with half baked results? You probably argue that the request you make on your iPhone will be encrypted and third party software can’t tell who’s asking and making a profile of you. They’ve found ways to do so long time ago.
True, but they are not training on your data because you are not submitting it. If you use Google tools, Google uses it to train its models and sell your data to the highest bidder. If you use Chatgpt, it will add to the Chatgpt model. Using other tools 'not from Apple' will add to their respective models, databases, etc. But if you use Safari and Apple-owned tools, that stays within the Apple ecosystem.
The same is true for their LLM. At the moment, I do not know if the model is training on your data. But if so, it is not submitted to a large LLM that everyone can use. Of course, if you use the ChatGPT integration, it will.
In my opinion, Apple AI is not nearly where it should be, and that will take longer than the rest. But while ChatGPT, Microsoft, and the rest will have problems proving where their data comes from (that is LAW in Europe), is that easier for Apple? It comes and stays within your own LLM model.
I am only talking about Apple software, not third-party software. Most are training their model to monetise in the future.

Privacy is a huge deal on the iPhone. Apple is making its business model of privacy. I only use Google Search because all the others do not come near the results of Google. I do not use Google Glass or ChatGPT apps—only the site. If you do not use the tools to profile you and lock your phone to not provide contacts, photos, etc., then it is a lot harder to do so.

I am not an insider. My observations are what I see and know and what I see happening—nothing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy
Seems that when all else fails, or when Apple has to play catch-up, they return to their time-old recipe of thinness as "innovation". That makes me think they really are all out of ideas.

Yeah, I agree - one wonders how long they keep rolling out the same playbook over and over

I was just watching a Dave2D video on some new laptop comparisons and the MacBook Air is the least "thin and light" of all the ones he was comparing. The whole point of the MBA originally was to blow everyone away with how thin and light it was ... and now it's basically "worst in class" on those metrics
 
Yeah, I agree - one wonders how long they keep rolling out the same playbook over and over
Hard to tell, at this point 14 years and counting.
I was just watching a Dave2D video on some new laptop comparisons and the MacBook Air is the least "thin and light" of all the ones he was comparing. The whole point of the MBA originally was to blow everyone away with how thin and light it was ... and now it's basically "worst in class" on those metrics
How about the metrics of performance and battery life?
 
What a silly opinion piece there.. Apple intelligence is not even really here yet. On screen awareness and LLM Siri will be the real deal, probably even going further into the future, some sort of „on-Vision-awareness“ like chatgpt previews earlier last year for the Apple Vision Pro. When you’re able to look at stuff and converse with Siri about what you’re looking at, that’s gonna be when things become interesting!
 
They haven’t released any Apple intelligence features here, yet.

But I’ve also not really heard much from people wanting AI one way or another. There is a small group of people who are into AI in general and enthusiastic about it, a bigger group who say they don’t see any use for it out are hostile to it and the biggest group of all know nothing about AI or don’t care one way or the other about it.
 
The iPhone is, in all aspects, too complicated. The iPhone was, at its core, a phone with benefits. More complex tasks are done on the Mac. Most average users need an iPhone with benefits. AI will only gain success on the iPhone when it delivers simplicity. Until then, failure.
 
What everyone here seems to be missing is that it’s all about the kids. My daughter is 11, gen Alpha, and uses Apple Intelligence way more than I ever have. She uses it to help her write stories, to create an imaginary friend that she writes back and forth to like a pen pal using the built-in ChatGPT, she uses it to generate all kinds of weird animal creatures in various styles and outfits and to help illustrate her stories, she makes GenMojis all the time with her friends in Messages, and more. The kids love the AI and the companies know this.

So far I’m unsure how I feel about it all. I don’t want to be an luddite about tech since it won’t be long before I’m just an old man that hates everything new. Personally I’ve found a lot of benefit to using AI in my work to speed up certain tasks and to check what I’m doing. I think more of the damage being done is by algorithms on social media. I’m also not a fan of what Meta is doing with integrating AI into their social network. As someone who used to be more of a designer and went to school for that, I also have some gripes about how AI trains on other user’s work. Apple says they paid for the training data, but how did the company they paid get the data? A lot of companies are modifying user agreements to “steal” this data.

You can stop reading here unless you think I’m a bad parent based on this comment. Wanted to add that we don’t let our kids use the iPad all day. They have strict time limits for games (30 minutes) and other apps such as AI, messaging, and creativity (30 minutes) for a total of an hour per day. After they do their chores after school. My daughter does more than AI, she has been taking music lessons IRL, learning French in Duolingo, makes music in Garage Band, loves making stop motion in this app and then edits the video and audio together in iMovie, and has a digital camera that she uses to take photos and edit them on her iPad and sets them to music in Garage Band. My son, who is younger, also draws a ton on his iPad and plays math games.
Ignore any post detractors. You got the right idea. You’re doing it right. Good parent!
+1 (although you don’t need me or anyone else to tell you that; keep up your good instincts)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.