Windows does things far worse than this alleged throttling; such as telemetry. They aren’t being investigated and it seems to me all Apple can say it’s part of advanced power management.Yes, that's why I think there should be an investigation and legal proceedings on it.
If that has been going and for how many years and on what devices? How much did it cost consumers and how many billions of dollars in increased revenue did it generate for Apple?
There's a lot of if's and many things that we do not know still but I think it would be a good thing for the consumers if it starts getting unraveled eventually![]()
[doublepost=1513276577][/doublepost]
Probably means it’s a conjecture about the number of units involved.Especially in today's governmental environment, it's essentially certain that the only way this gets resolved is through private litigation. It needs a lot more than a reddit thread or two, though. Someone would have to sponsor some thorough, scientific testing. Given the number of phones potentially involved (even if it's just the 6S models, but especially if others are affected as well), there probably is enough money potentially at the end of the process to make that investment worthwhile.
[doublepost=1513276680][/doublepost]
So they didn’t say anything before “the discovery” and not saying anything “after the discovery” and that's indicative of what? Their guilt? Interesting way of forming a conclusion.It’s pretty clear this was done to avoid initiating a recall for defective batteries. Not sure why you think we don’t know why this was done. It’s crystal clear. Apple did not want to spend money solving battery problems on older iPhones and came up with throttling as a patch up solution.
[doublepost=1513273681][/doublepost]
Apple was hiding it because the ingenuity of their plan is that no one would be able to tell battery wear and slowdown were related. A user stumbled on it by accident and now they have no response left to give hence the silence.