Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Mark my words..

Steve Jobs will be retiring from Apple in 2009. Just like Gates has from MS.

It will be the end of an era, as well as Apple's stock price.
 
He's admitted that he doesn't like public speaking. But for Christ's sake, they could have done better then Phil Schiller, that man is worse then my history teacher.
Personally, I like Phil's approach.

Face it, no body will replace SJ. Those days are gone. Time to move on.

The expo concept used to be critical to get information out and reviews of new products completed. They were expensive and resource intensive.

These days, with the Internet, the need for an expo has significantly diminished. With streaming video, SJ (or whomever) could do a mini presentation right on Apple's campus in their studio and stream it out to the masses. Around the world, individuals could easily tune in and watch the stream. Seems like it would work.

I really can't imagine a macworld or some other keynote without jobs.
Agree with this.

However, the MacWorld expo concept is dying. Time to move on.


At MacWorld, Schiller gives solid keynote with new Imacs, MacPro, AND MacMini (with HDMI). One more thing... calls Ive on brand new iPhone (version 3) for videochat using new front-facing camera and video features.... Ive walks on stage as they talk to great applause... as crowd simmers down... another call comes in (from you know who... SJ looking quite fit) for a 3-way video chat... "Coming June 2009..." goes up on screen as lights fade.
Change "Coming June 2009..." to the new iPhone will be available in two weeks, and I think that it would be a winner.

Optimistic. Perhaps too much so. Here's what I think:

Updates to:
Mac Mini
iMac
Mac Pro
iPhone to 32 gb
(40 minutes)

Snow Leopard talk
(10-15 minutes)

SJ at the end saying hello, looking normal, reviewing MWSF history and saying goodbye to MWSF.
(10-15 minutes)

End of show.
(0 minutes)
Interesting.

Seems reasonable.

Most likely the opposite - MORE special events, spread throughout the year.
I like this concept.

It would probably help Apple on inventory as well because when they had a special event, the new product would be available at that time or shortly thereafter.

Over the years, Macworlds have been decreasing. Paris. Tokyo. Boston. All eliminated. Only SF remains. And now, it looks like it will be dropped. IMHO, this is good for Apple. It frees them to their own schedule rather than being tied into an expo.

The only surprising thing about this one, is that SJ will not be making the last Keynote speech. My guess is that he will appear somehow for a short time during the Keynote.
 
Hope So!

Apple doesn't NEED MacWorld anymore.
But don't worry, you'll still be seeing lots of Steve.

Calm down people!

I hope so! It fine to say that the Retail stores, which have more than 3.5 million people visit every week, are a way to interact with people, except that the majority of the stores are in the US. What about people outside of the States. Hopefully Apple doesn't repeat the past where they focus on the US while the rest of the world is almost an after thought. There is far more room for Apple to grow outside the States.

Using apple.com on it's own to cater for people outside the States is not an acceptable alternative. In my opinion Apple Special events that replace Macworld with at least some participation from Steve are the way to go.

These events would maintain the buzz surrounding Apple and their new products. They would get the message out to more people faster and drive them to visit the the apple.com website (and the retail stores for that matter).
 
I wonder if the people running macworld simply did something to piss off Steve Jobs. Maybe it was too late for them to completely pull the keynote and do their own separate thing, so he decided to have Phil do it instead just so he wouldn't have to be there.
 
wow, no Stevenote. Possibilities:

1. No new products worthy of his Steveness
2. Apple is shifting attention away from Steve in a succession effort.
3. Steve is sick and unable to make the keynote.

My bet is on a combination of 1 and 2.

My bet is that Apple is just sick and tired of having to come up with new products around Macworld rather than maintaining its own schedule.
 
I hope so! It fine to say that the Retail stores, which have more than 3.5 million people visit every week, are a way to interact with people, except that the majority of the stores are in the US. What about people outside of the States. Hopefully Apple doesn't repeat the past where they focus on the US while the rest of the world is almost an after thought. There is far more room for Apple to grow outside the States.

Using apple.com on it's own to cater for people outside the States is not an acceptable alternative. In my opinion Apple Special events that replace Macworld with at least some participation from Steve are the way to go.

These events would maintain the buzz surrounding Apple and their new products. They would get the message out to more people faster and drive them to visit the the apple.com website (and the retail stores for that matter).

Apple has already been shifting its focus to its own special events. Macworld was going to die eventually.
 
Actually is this a good thing?

Maybe Apple will release hardware faster now, instead of waiting for the keynotes to announce new stuff. Maybe Apple is getting with the game?

Part of Apple's success and appeal is them pretending theyre intentionally "not" getting with the game.
 
Based on this news... AAPL hovers between low 80s to low 90s for next few weeks. At MacWorld, Schiller gives solid keynote with new Imacs, MacPro, AND MacMini (with HDMI). One more thing... calls Ive on brand new iPhone (version 3) for videochat using new front-facing camera and video features.... Ive walks on stage as they talk to great applause... as crowd simmers down... another call comes in (from you know who... SJ looking quite fit) for a 3-way video chat... "Coming June 2009..." goes up on screen as lights fade. AAPL moves quickly past 110 and hits 150 before year end 2009 based on continuing growth of laptop share, solid success with desktops, and very robust US and global iPhone revenues.

You heard it here first...

I hope your not basing it upon this.
 
There has been a coup in the palace. Phil Schiller finally snapped after spending five hours trying to position his iMac so it didn't catch the reflections from the picture windows in his office. Steve Jobs is now down in the basement, tied up with FW400 cables.
 
I don't mind about the end of MacWorld or any other expo from Apple. I just want to see Steve Jobs making a keynote at least twice a year and showing new products! It could be a live stream from Apple Campus or his basement, I don't care.. all it matters is his speech.
 
There has been a coup in the palace. Phil Schiller finally snapped after spending five hours trying to position his iMac so it didn't catch the reflections from the picture windows in his office. Steve Jobs is now down in the basement, tied up with FW400 cables.

Now That was funny--))) LOL!--))) Thanks for the giggles! ;):)
 
As someone already wrote before me, the true is, we don't need S. Jobs anymore. The same goes for these shows like MacWorld. These days are over. Apple is also neglecting the "so-called" pro-segment, so that means, that their are not their main market now.

iMac and Macbooks, iPods and iPhones... these are the products, that people know, buy, uses.

Very well than, good bye, Apple!
 
One man doesn't make a company.

Depends on the Mac. Look at the directionless beige Apple of the 90s or the farce that was Dell when Kevin Rollins as running it. Some companies depend on a type of authoritarian leadership. That type of leadership also isn't very conducive to training successors when everything is imposed from the top.
 
One man doesn't make a company.

No, but SJ = Apple. His persona makes up the persona of the compnay... at least it does for now. If he is leaving, there will need to be a Reality Distortion Field transplant to whomever takes over the position.

Personally, I feel when he does eventually leave, he'll retain some creative control and keep up doing the keynotes. Just reducing his day-to-day responsibilities.

Apparently NYT seems to be taking the, it might be his health approach.
 
Ultimately Apple is doing the right thing by continuing to de-emphasize Steve. This may not be easy or go smoothly, but as many have correctly said, Apple is not just Steve Jobs. There are many other talented and creative folks at Apple. Transition or succession plans have probably been in effect for a while, and Steve will most likely be around at Apple for a good while yet. Don't be surprised if his presence is felt at MacWorld.

I do look forward to Phil's keynote. He will do well and probably unveil some cool new products. I like Phil, however he needs to think before he speaks. Last year he couldn't resist referring to Microsoft ActiveSync as "ActiveStink" when introducing MobileMe, yet months later Apple unleashed its own disastrous and mother of all stink bombs upon the world before it was ready. Not only was MobileMe's launch an unmitigated disaster, but Mac OS X was also missing "Push" functionality only up until this week. I hope Phil has learned his lesson about trash talking the competition and then falling flat on his face.

MacWord RIP.
 
Maybe I missed it, but I haven't seen the most important question of all addressed here yet: who's going to be this year's musical act at the end of the Keynote? Maybe that's when Steve will come out, playing something by the Beatles on an iPhone app? :eek:
 
MacWorld has joined the ranks of the World Series and the All-You-Can-Eat-Buffet as just another misnomer event. Thing is, they did that when iPod and iPhone mania soaked up all the focus.

There has been a coup in the palace. Phil Schiller finally snapped after spending five hours trying to position his iMac so it didn't catch the reflections from the picture windows in his office. Steve Jobs is now down in the basement, tied up with FW400 cables.

THAT was funny. My inner joke for the day. Thank you.
 
Why? So we could all huddle together and feel all warm and nostalgic and have a moment of closure? What has Steve Jobs ever done to give you the idea he would step away from something like MacWorld with any nostalgia or ceremony? Was it when he slashed through Apple's product line-up when he returned to Apple? Was it the clearing out of the old Mac archival stuff from the Apple campus? Was it the jettisoning of all the beloved Mac-isms from the OS 9 era? Was it his complete lack of acknowledgement of any of Apple's supposedly significant anniversaries? The man clearly isn't as nostalgic about these things as some of his customers are.

Slow down. No, it's so Apple doesn't end their long association with MacWorld with a kick at IDG's crotch. Note that as of a couple of days ago, IDG was talking about expecting to announce Jobs as keynote speaker at any moment. Then we get this announcement from Apple instead -- and not only no Uncle Steve, but no more Apple at MacWorld. Reading between the lines, it seems that something was being negotiated between Apple and IDG. What ever they were talking about must have reached an impasse, and that's when Apple pulled the nuclear option.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.