This sounds like a gross generalisation.
I work in Criminal law in Toronto. I see if first hand on an almost daily basis.
This sounds like a gross generalisation.
The issue is that in between, say, 600 and 1880 being a woman under Islam would have been superior than under Christianity. It's only in the 150 years since then that that has reversed. Hell it was probably better being a woman under Islam until 1918.
Yes, great Christianity is ahead today, but so what?
So are you OK with me judging Christians on the behaviour of the Spanish Inquisition and indulgences etc etc?
I work in Criminal law in Toronto. I see if first hand on an almost daily basis.
Take a look around Paris, London, or Toronto and then say it's not their religion but their governments.
In Toronto, which i know first hand, if a Muslim woman doesn't submit to all of that treatment, her family back home will be punished for her transgression. The Muslim community here reports "back home".
Women here, in Toronto, are regularly beaten by husbands, brothers, fathers, and community leaders. And if they go to the police, their family is murdered "back home". And you believe that's caused by far off governments and not their culture here?
Yes, but this is proof to support what I'm saying. This ban clearly applies to all entries from those specific 7 countries, not only to immigrants, and not immigration in general.
Calling it an "immigration ban" is like saying that Apple makes only desktop personal computers. It's simply false.
I said all religion is evil. You also have the dates wrong. Golden age of silam was between ~800 and 1100 AD and since then women in islam countries have suffered greatly and can't be compared to anything in Europe or America.
Do you know what an argument from ignorance is?No, you see the worst aspects of it. Just like the police do.
Yes, great Christianity is ahead today, but so what?
So are you OK with me judging Christians on the behaviour of the Spanish Inquisition and indulgences etc etc?
And judge Muslims the say way. A difficult past that they've worked hard to make much worse.
I hope you are joking.Women under Christianity got **** all inheritance until the late 19th century, they got **** all education, they couldn't vote and they had to go to the doctor to get an orgasm.
At least under Islam they did get things like inheritance - albeit a reduced share.
They simple hate Trump. Facts will be twisted. Lies will be told. It doesn't matter to the left. Whatever brings down Trump is acceptable to the left. The ends justifies the means.It's mind boggling that a temporary suspension of travel to the US from citizens of 7 countries is advertised as an "immigration ban". This kind of astonishingly barefaced lie is what got Trump elected to begin with, and they're still at it.
Women under Christianity got **** all inheritance until the late 19th century, they got **** all education, they couldn't vote and they had to go to the doctor to get an orgasm.
At least under Islam they did get things like inheritance - albeit a reduced share.
And many of those living modern lives if asked if it's ok to kill in the name of god will say YES. That's the main problem with islam.Plenty of muslims do actually live modern lives.
I'm not sure if this is serious or not. Women in some Islamic countries who get RAPED get sent to prison for "adultury". It's insane.Women under Christianity got **** all inheritance until the late 19th century, they got **** all education, they couldn't vote and they had to go to the doctor to get an orgasm.
At least under Islam they did get things like inheritance - albeit a reduced share.
And many of those living modern lives if asked if it's ok to kill in the name of god will say YES. That's the main problem with islam.
I'm not sure if this is serious or not. Women in some Islamic countries who get RAPED get sent to prison for "adultury". It's insane.
Oh I see. So if there's someone who's not a Muslim but is a misogynist, it somehow changes the fact that the Muslim culture is misogynistic? Really? There's some interesting logic.
The main problem is that Islam hasn't gone through a reformation like all the other major religions. Islam is still stuck in the 13th century.And many of those living modern lives if asked if it's ok to kill in the name of god will say YES. That's the main problem with islam.
No, you see the worst aspects of it. Just like the police do.
To be honest I don't understand why you think that "ban" and "immigration ban" are the same thing.You said:
"It's mind boggling that a temporary suspension of travel to the US from citizens of 7 countries is advertised as an "immigration ban"."
I'm saying the reason people are calling it a ban is because Trump himself repeatedly called it a ban. That is why we are using that term. That is why is being talked about as a ban. I can not be more explicit about the reasoning this is being called a ban. Now maybe my reading comprehension is incredibly poor but I'm shocked that you've had to reply to this 8 times to be honest.
Apple itself wouldn't have happened without them. Steve Jobs was the son of a Syrian immigrant fleeing political persecution.
Silly move and symptomatic of Apple's exaggerated sense of its own importance. Trump had a good majority of americans agreeing with him so Apple is now telling most of its customers they are stupid.
I'd say first-hand experience seeing women treated as slaves by the muslim community in Toronto, Canada, refutes your argument that it's not the culture but the middle-eastern governments that abuse women.
Latest pols in the UK say 70% are ok with killing in the name of god.Got any evidence for that?
Yet, Women in some Islamic countries who get RAPED get to go to court and send the rapist to a life in prison. perhaps the problem is in the countries and not in the islam itself, right?
Latest pols in the UK say 70% are ok with killing in the name of god.
Do you know if a woman was raped in islamic country it's her fault and in some countries her husband can kill her for that?