Apple is trying to sell their leftovers. It is crazy they are trying to make money with schools.
Very classy!
Very classy!
A lot of schools won't require the performance nor will they have power users.
The specs Apple are offering are enough for your average school needs.
The sad part is that most schools, institutions of higher learning, and informed business will want to keep the machines for a lot longer than 2 years. From a consumer standpoint . . . sure, spend $999 now and then spend another grand in 2 years when your machine starts to show age.
In a budget conscience environment like a school or university, where you're spending more for the software anyhow, you can't justify dropping $999 for 2GB of RAM and a dual core chip then try to upgrade to whole new system in a few years.
These machines have to last at least past their warranties if not double that in most situation.
The university I work for has about 40 six year old MacPro towers that they are just now going to put upgrades into. And a whole host of white Intel iMacs that were top-of-the-line 6 years ago that are still kicking. Suggesting that the "basic" user won't need that much power isn't looking at it in the right way at all, and isn't very economical.
Overall this is a smart move. Most basic Labs need basic machines, why have a $1200 /$1500 Mac when really it is just for Internet, Intranet, Word, Excel etc. and even 2Gb RAM will do the job fine (Bit stingy Apple but no surprise). Hard disk is generally irrelevant as network homes/mobile Homes will be in operation anyway, graphics wise it is fine for task.
Because they are used to using Windows, they will always use Windows?
$150 difference for a thousand machines is approx $150,000. That's a lot of money.
One of my friends, studied at University of Hertfordshire, UK and all the machines in all the computer clusters were OS X based, most of them being iMacs.
So if the software permits, there could be massive deployment of OSX based iMacs in the next few years in all the major universities in the US as well as the UK.
I love the imac but I would be really disappointed if i was a student and they bought these. Of course it depends on what type of school too but really would prefer mac pro's over a room of low end imacs.
Apple is trying to sell their leftovers. It is crazy they are trying to make money with schools.
Very classy!![]()
Bad move not having thunderbolt... Apple really should be making every effort possible to make it an industry standard, i.e. stick it on every single machine that they make! Even iPads! (well maybe not but yeah)
The sad part is that most schools, institutions of higher learning, and informed business will want to keep the machines for a lot longer than 2 years. From a consumer standpoint . . . sure, spend $999 now and then spend another grand in 2 years when your machine starts to show age.
I can't see this being popular, bearing in mind that the vast majority of schools and universities, at least here in the UK, are still based around Windows. And the fact that a model with a vastly better processor is only $150 more.
Does it come with a wired keyboard and mouse?
I'm sure students would hate having to change batteries.
Agreed, 2 GB is indeed on the (too) low end of the spectrum...![]()
I can't see this being popular, bearing in mind that the vast majority of schools and universities, at least here in the UK, are still based around Windows. And the fact that a model with a vastly better processor is only $150 more.
The sad part is that most schools, institutions of higher learning, and informed business will want to keep the machines for a lot longer than 2 years. From a consumer standpoint . . . sure, spend $999 now and then spend another grand in 2 years when your machine starts to show age.
These machines have to last at least past their warranties if not double that in most situation.
The university I work for has about 40 six year old MacPro towers that they are just now going to put upgrades into. And a whole host of white Intel iMacs that were top-of-the-line 6 years ago that are still kicking. Suggesting that the "basic" user won't need that much power isn't looking at it in the right way at all, and isn't very economical.