Is it really? Where? For some reason I need to see this haha
OK, OK, I meant the MacBook. I'm getting old school, so that is where my head was this A.M.
Is it really? Where? For some reason I need to see this haha
I can't see this being popular, bearing in mind that the vast majority of schools and universities, at least here in the UK, are still based around Windows. And the fact that a model with a vastly better processor is only $150 more.
Schools, even universities normally utilize the following (in no particular order):
1) Interent
2) Word Processing
3) Spreadsheets
4) Powerpoint Presentations
5) Email
None of the above are power intensive and can all be easily handled by the iMac for Education.
The only graphics-intensive application a high school or university might use is for engineering / architectural courses when utilizing AutoCAD, CAM, or some other GPU-intensive programs. For those students, the schools tend to buy a small amount of computers which are able to handle the computing workload.
My whole school has Macs too (even dual bootable in XP).
- HDD not an issue since my school wipes them clean everyday (tells us not to save anything
- RAM not an issue. The computers are so locked down anyways that all you can really do is open Safari and Word.
- Graphics: overkill IMO since schools lock down computers so much, theres hardly any games that can harness the power. You can't even play flash based games on my school's network.
-
- 3.1GHz Intel Core i3 Dual-Core
- 21.5-inch LCD
- AMD Radeon HD 6750 with 256MB
- 2GB RAM
- 250GB Hard Drive
+School users typically run a small number of concurrent threads so most of the time a 3.1GHz dual core will be just as fast as a 2.5GHz quad core.
+Schools like all-in-one units with easy to clean glass screens.
+Graphics capabilities are solid for school use.
- 2GB of RAM?!? What decade is this? Total dick head move that probably saved Apple less than $8 per unit.
= School labs don't require much storage capacity, but where on earth did Apple find such ancient drives? Maybe when WD acquired Hitachi's drive business they found a warehouse full of those dinosaurs and offered Apple a deal they couldn't refuse.
Schools typically want their computers to have as few I/O capabilities as possible so they would see no value in Thunderbolt.
Schools, even universities normally utilize the following (in no particular order):
1) Interent
2) Word Processing
3) Spreadsheets
4) Powerpoint Presentations
5) Email
None of the above are power intensive and can all be easily handled by the iMac for Education.
The only graphics-intensive application a high school or university might use is for engineering / architectural courses when utilizing AutoCAD, CAM, or some other GPU-intensive programs. For those students, the schools tend to buy a small amount of computers which are able to handle the computing workload.
Or they could save even more by buying the refurb imac for $929 with better specs.Because they are used to using Windows, they will always use Windows?
$150 difference for a thousand machines is approx $150,000. That's a lot of money.
Or they could save even more by buying the refurb imac for $929 with better specs.
Small drives make sense for schools, as schools usually just have a big ol' server for the students to save all their work on, and I believe now a-days they wipe all the computers after they shut off anyway. Didn't used to be like that, you used to be able to save files on a computer, but, kids are a lot smarter now a days.
So the universities are wasting money on purchasing Macs and putting the costs on the students. Brilliant. Now I know why my university tuition fees tripled.
Apple seems to be getting more like the Grinch with education nowadays. Use to have more off on macbooks....use to give away ipods(now just a $100 off at the appstore.![]()