Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8H7 Safari/6533.18.5)
Nice, I'm in for 0 of em!
Giving up quad core, 2gb ram, and a nice chunk of hdd space to save $150 doesn't seem worth it. I realize that might change when you are buying 50 of them, but still...
Also, I wonder why Apple would want their slowest, worst machines to be the ones used in education. It will be the first experience a lot of kids have with a Mac. You'd think they might just offer some extra volume discounts to education on their standard models.
As you hinted, it is likely do to cost v.s. need. I would bet that most average users barely tap into 50% of the capability of their fast systems day to day.
I am not sure how it was in your school, however a majority of computers in my day were used for word processing, spreadsheets, web surfing, research, light photo editing, and even some graphics rendering. If a computer was needed for video editing, heavy photo processing, 3d Rendering, modeling or otherwise, those departments would have dedicated / faster computers for that purpose.
There is no need for a school district to spend $1500+ per computer to fill entire labs, or classrooms when a cheaper alternative exists. I sure as hell don't want to school district I pay taxes for, doing such frivilous spending!!
also uses a not so pretty 20" TN panel so the new ones definately filled a hole
To be fair, not many people can and will be able to tell the difference between a good TN and an IPS display. There are differences, but not enough for most who call themselves 'power users' to pick out without digging deep.
It would be a hard sale for someone to convince me that I need an IPS display to do reports, calculations, web surfing, or similar.