Well, that's your opinion then... No problem, but I think discussion boards are not only there to praise Apple and defend everything they do. If that's arrogant or childish to you, I really don't give a **** ... (In a very arrogant way)
I do. Never used it either. Why would I?Are you for real? Who in the world uses a 600,- to 800,- USD/EUR device w/o any protection?
The z5 compacy is 1.8 mm thicker and has roughly 1,000 mah more than the 6s. So no it does not take THIS much extra thickness.
Mophie battery packs are filled out and does not affect the case. Stop trying to find excuses.
he said BATTERY cases....Are you for real? Who in the world uses a 600,- to 800,- USD/EUR device w/o any protection?
I'm still in shock and total disbelief that _anyone_ at Apple would approve this dreadful and hideous looking product to be released.APPLE REVEALS IPHONE BATTERY LIFE FIX ... TRY NOT TO LAUGH
Yep, this is the headline in the Guardian.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/dec/08/apple-iphone-battery-life-fix
Ugly looking case.
I'm guessing a lot of the negative comments are coming from the existing battery case makers(employees). That and the usual trolls.
In my haste I neglected the desire to sell underwhelming products, upsell to more expensive models, and on top of that sell first party accessories!Nope. More like make the phone thinner with so-so battery life, and sell people accessories to rectify piss poor design decisions to go thinner for some silly reason.
Double your margins. Fleece the consumer.
There's a reason why Apple decided to produce such an item now. Any clear-thinking person can see that it is a result of a second generation of complaints about iPhone battery life. (6 then 6S). They're not isolated complaints but significant enough that Apple felt the need to respond.Or, consumers who have come to expect well designed, functional and beautiful products from Apple--not this train wreck of a battery case.
How may "un-Apple-like" products need to get released before it is considered "Apple-like"?It's the most un-Apple-like product Apple has ever released.![]()
The Quasimodo of phone battery packs cases.
Nope. My assumption is that Apple comes out with a new product category every few years at most. From the iPod to the iPhone was almost 7 years. To live up to its glory days, Apple can coast for several more years, merely incrementally improving it existing products. The days when Apple came up with something totally innovative every year were... never.
My "nope" was referring to your mistake about what I was assuming, so the rest of your post doesn't have much to do with me. It seems you and I are not discussing the same subject.There is no "nope" about it. It's an indisputable fact that Apple classifies the AW as an accessory. It's still a product. An accessory is a product. But again my original post made no implicit or explicit reference to the AW. If you implied it then you must be a bit sensitive on the issue.
That said, I'm enjoying my AW. Not sure it's going to ever be a blockbuster like the iPod was or iPhone is. Everyone needs a phone. Not everyone cares to wear a watch, especially when it only mirrors the functionality of the watch. Added convenience, absolutely. Necessity, not really. Truly AW is the definition of a luxury product.
Apple seems to be steadily losing focus and commitment to beautiful design. I think I first noticed it with the camera lens protrusion out of the back of the iPhone 6. I don't believe that's something SJ would have tolerated. Then there is, to my mind at least, the questionable aesthetics of the Apple Watch. Speaking only in terms of appearance, I find some of the round-face android watches more attractive. Now there is this hideous battery pack case, a product which Apple had no need to make. There are plenty of third-party offerings readily available, and were this case made by anyone else, I think it would be nearly universally panned for the way it looks. Very disappointing.
Im still flabbergasted by is statement ... What exactly makes the Hermes edition look any different than the basic Watch stainless with brown leather band? They are the exact same watch design, one with arguably better leather, and contrasting stitching. Remove the bands and they are the exact same watch.I like the design of the Apple Watch Hermès. It is far better looking than any other smart watch as far as I'm concerned.
The z5 does not have lots of things inside like the 6s? And your example is haptic feedback motor? Last I checked the z5c vibrates or does it not?You can't compare two phones thickness and say if they added 1.8mm it'll give X amount of battery life extra - the z5 doesn't have lots of things the iPhone 6s has inside, like the haptic feedback motor for a start off, so its a ridiculous assumption.
Plus I don't want an extra 2mm on my phone just so YOU can have more battery - hence the option of the battery pack and case, i'm sure you love cases too if you're not bothered about thickness. You've got an option of filled our or not filled out now, so buy what you want? Personally I think this looks better and thinner than the morphine case - at least its basically the same as the standard extra cover with a small bulge in the back that increases grip.
No I wouldn't have one, but then I don't like the official case (or any case) either and regret picking it up, so its not for me. Nor do I care for a bigger phone with increased battery life, its just fine for me, i'm always near a charging port if I really need one.
Im still flabbergasted by is statement ... What exactly makes the Hermes edition look any different than the basic Watch stainless with brown leather band? They are the exact same watch design, one with arguably better leather, and contrasting stitching. Remove the bands and they are the exact same watch.
The only thing the 6s has more inside is 3d touch, while the z5 compact has dual speakers. Not t moention it is shorter and not as wide as 6s.
They could easily find a middle ground and add 400 mah with a 1mm increase. Are you going to argue that making it 1mm thicker is too much? Please don't.
I continue to argue that this is evidence that Jony isn't involved in day to day design anymoreI'm still in shock and total disbelief that _anyone_ at Apple would approve this dreadful and hideous looking product to be released.
If Samsung did such a thing the Apple Cadre of Haters would light up the web with criticism...
Apple takes Hypocritical Behaviour to an entirely new level.
J Ive truly has Apple by the nads
He doesn't do anything but collect Apple Cash, laugh at them and screw off...
I agree.I continue to argue that this is evidence that Jony isn't involved in day to day design anymore