Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My wish - €699 for a base model with 16GB RAM and 256GB strage, and €799 with 512GB storage.

In reality - €799 for base model with 8GB RAM and 128GB storage, with 12/16GB RAM and 256/512GB storage options.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
En****ification much. COMPLETELY lost direction if this is true. Reminds me of Sony. Used to make great products, then tried to make every product known to man with more misses than hits and now where are they?
I see my post cause quite a stir hehe. My point was effectively that the MacBookAir is supposed to be the entry level notebook. There's practically nothing to it. How else can they make a cheaper notebook without making it cr*ppier than what is already available? No ports, low quality screen, cheap plastic enclosure? If they do make it of lesser quality then my point stands firm. If they intend to keep the build quality Apple is known for then just lower the price of the MacBookAir (which they won't). So they will make a cr*ppier product to grab every penny they can for the sake of shareholders. That's fine from a business point of view but from the customer point of view it's en****ification.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: b.inazawa-fan
An iPad is an iPad, and the Mac is a Mac. Obviously there’s some functional overlap, but they’re two completely different products. So in the same way a cheap Mac doesn’t kill a cheap iPhone, it doesn’t kill a cheap iPad. Many people will still prefer the iPad.
Those folk who want to keep the precise iPad functionality of iPad OS can do that as that can be done quite easily via theming engines. For more advanced users who want a Mac OS on iPad, then it makes no sense to not support that as it would be cheaper in the long run for Apple. iPad users who need their simple, dumbed down interface can easily be supported by allowing real users to be productive.
 
I see my post cause quite a stir hehe. My point was effectively that the MacBookAir is supposed to be the entry level notebook. There's practically nothing to it. How else can they make a cheaper notebook without making it cr*ppier than what is already available? No ports, low quality screen, cheap plastic enclosure? If they do make it of lesser quality then my point stands firm. If they intend to keep the build quality Apple is known for then just lower the price of the MacBookAir (which they won't). So they will make a cr*ppier product to grab every penny they can for the sake of shareholders. That's fine from a business point of view but from the customer point of view it's en****ification.
Those M1 MBAs are too premium still for the price they're selling at. I think that's the issue for Apple. They see a market segment they're selling volume in but it's encroaching on later model MBAs. A buyer seeing an M1 MBA or an M5 MBA will see the chip speed is different but really nothing else so plop for the cheaper model.
 
They've missed a trick here not recycling displays from the entry-level iPad and making an 11" Laptop. The smaller Macbook Air is sorely missed around these parts. Its the perfect size to sell en-masse to budget-strapped customers and K-12.
 
Makes no sense. Would make more sense to sell the MBA M1/M2/or M3 in addition to M4 at a price reduction of $200 lower than M4 per chip generation. So M1 can be maybe $500ish ($400 would be too low I suppose).
Perhaps not for us as an audience but Apple makes a lot of money selling its lowest-spec devices (iPhone 16e, Base iPad etc) by the pallet-load to businesses and the education sector. A £$600 Macbook makes perfect sense to compete with the Dells and HPs of the world doing just this with Windows machines.
 
Those M1 MBAs are too premium still for the price they're selling at. I think that's the issue for Apple. They see a market segment they're selling volume in but it's encroaching on later model MBAs. A buyer seeing an M1 MBA or an M5 MBA will see the chip speed is different but really nothing else so plop for the cheaper model.
I agree about the price overlaps. It's so confusing these days as to which product suits you best and no matter what you choose there is always the premium. There is one massive gap though and that is a 27" (or 30") iMac specced with a pro chip around the £2k - £2.5k mark. Pretty much where a lot of graphic design studios would buy. Since they dropped the 27" many studios have stuck with what they have as the 24" is too small and has no pro chip and the studio starts at £2k without a screen. The product line and pricings are all over the place from a customer point of view. I waited YEARS for a new 27" iMac but eventually bit the bullet and bought an M4 mini and the money I saved from my usual £2.5k budget I went and bought a third party monitor. I'd have preferred an all in one solution but Apple no longer provides it or expects you to pay £3.5k for base Studio and Display.
 
What don’t you get? Read some of the enthusiastic posts in this string. Clearly, many people would love a machine like this. Ask yourself: Do you really not get this… or is it just not for you?
No, I mean this is Apple, MBA sells for $999 and on a deal often for $799. Why would Apple mess around in a more budget laptop market than this and price themselves out of their markup they are known for? Doesn't sound like Apple to me. Have my doubts we see this.

The exception is if they add ports to MBA and push up the price and pitch it as more than it is now, and then they slide this new "budget" model into the lineup at around $999 (just below, not well below $1,000). That sounds more like something Apple might do.
 
Last edited:
I am sure this was mentioned multiple times in this thread already: With older Macbook Air models being on sale and on clearance for well under a thousand bucks there is just no point in releasing a budget Macbook with worse specs. Nobody needs to pay MSRP on Macbooks, there is Walmart/Target/... sales and membership deals every couple months so chances are you'll find a M4 Macbook Air with 16 gigs of RAM for cheap once the new M5 models as well as the entry level Macbook launch in 2026.

Furthermore there generally is little point in buying a brand new budget device versus buying a slightly used better spec device at the same price. The experience with "bargain bin" hardware is going to be noticably worse. For example to make such a low entry level price point of well under 800 bucks a reality they might do away with a USB-C port or maybe they'll opt not to include the Magsafe port instead. Something will have to give, the hardware has to be significantly worse than that of a M4 Macbook Air.

Is it really worth buying a Macbook with an iPhone SoC for let's say 650 bucks when you can get a M3 Air for a little bit more and the M4 Air for $799?

M4 MacBook Air is regularly on sale for $799, so it must be “well under” that price to make a difference.
I don't think it will be because Apple only ever considers their own MSRP pricing and Apple does not do sales in their own stores either. How retailers decide on pricing is none of Apple's business. Even if it's well below $799 it won't be a good deal either. You can get a slightly used M4 Air or the older M3 version and you'll be much better of with the M4 performance and all the hardware features like Magsafe and 2 Thunderbolt ports.

Because I really doubt that Apple can go much below $799 without reducing specs considerably. With the iPhone processor that Macbook will most definitely lose both Thunderbolt ports. They might remain as USB4 ports but that iPhone SoC does not have enough PCIe lanes for two fully featured Thunderbolt 4 ports.

The M4 Air is a very solid baseline and there is little reason to go scraping the bottom of the barrel to save 50 to 100 bucks. It might still do well with sales because many people aren't comfortably to buy used or simply don't have time to research the best deals. Imagine a customer going to a store and ask for the 2 cheapest laptops in stock. The store employee might return with one terrible plastic Windows laptop and with a aluminum unibody Macbook. Obviously that Macbook is going to sell no matter how gimped it ends up...
 
I'm not from the States, but I don't see the logic of Apple having to open a new production line for the rumoured macbook just for the sake of entering into other markets. It could well just keep the M1 production line and make more shipments to those markets and could do just fine, right? Especially the rumoured spec is 12.9" with a A18pro at the price of USD599, which is quite identical to the M1 air.
I would imagine the A18 Pro is cheaper to produce than the M1.
 
Given Apple's current legislation issues surrounding AppStore monopoly, etc, I don't think this laptop (if it exists) will come with an OS that only allows installs via the AppStore. I think that option is off the table.

If this thing will exist I honestly hope it doesn't run iPadOS. I have an iPad with a keyboard and - for me - the iPad is not a device for creation. I want FTP to access server logs. I want a terminal. I want to write code that I can push to repo. Maybe the iPad can do that, but I want to do that on a light-weight macOS device using tools I already know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
I am sure this was mentioned multiple times in this thread already: With older Macbook Air models being on sale and on clearance for well under a thousand bucks there is just no point in releasing a budget Macbook with worse specs. Nobody needs to pay MSRP on Macbooks, there is Walmart/Target/... sales and membership deals every couple months so chances are you'll find a M4 Macbook Air with 16 gigs of RAM for cheap once the new M5 models as well as the entry level Macbook launch in 2026.
Not everybody tracks deals or is even aware of sales deals for Macs. They'll see it cost $999 for the cheapest Mac laptop which is out of their price range.
Furthermore there generally is little point in buying a brand new budget device versus buying a slightly used better spec device at the same price. The experience with "bargain bin" hardware is going to be noticably worse. For example to make such a low entry level price point of well under 800 bucks a reality they might do away with a USB-C port or maybe they'll opt not to include the Magsafe port instead. Something will have to give, the hardware has to be significantly worse than that of a M4 Macbook Air.
Most people don't buy second hand laptops in the Windows world. They want a new one with a warranty that can be dealt with when things go awry. That's why The Geek Squad make so much money for Best Buy.
Is it really worth buying a Macbook with an iPhone SoC for let's say 650 bucks when you can get a M3 Air for a little bit more and the M4 Air for $799?
You've lost the market segment at that point. Windows users are very price conscious and focus on price above all else so will see 150 bucks of difference. That's the difference between Windows users buying a Mac and Mac users doing the same.
The M4 Air is a very solid baseline and there is little reason to go scraping the bottom of the barrel to save 50 to 100 bucks. It might still do well with sales because many people aren't comfortably to buy used or simply don't have time to research the best deals. Imagine a customer going to a store and ask for the 2 cheapest laptops in stock. The store employee might return with one terrible plastic Windows laptop and with a aluminum unibody Macbook. Obviously that Macbook is going to sell no matter how gimped it ends up...
Yet M1 MBA are selling and Apple has noticed. PC laptop makers like Dell sell those cheap laptops made of plastic not because they're good but because they sell. Dell has to have a presence in every, EVERY, market segment so they have a price point and make a laptop with components to fit it. It's a different dynamic. Putting iPhone chips into these laptops is a rounding error in production of those chips and this is the first time Apple has ever been in this position of being able to hit a lower price point but keep profit margins.
 
Is it really worth buying a Macbook with an iPhone SoC for let's say 650 bucks when you can get a M3 Air for a little bit more and the M4 Air for $799?

I don't think it will be because Apple only ever considers their own MSRP pricing and Apple does not do sales in their own stores either. How retailers decide on pricing is none of Apple's business. Even if it's well below $799 it won't be a good deal either. You can get a slightly used M4 Air or the older M3 version and you'll be much better of with the M4 performance and all the hardware features like Magsafe and 2 Thunderbolt ports.

Because I really doubt that Apple can go much below $799 without reducing specs considerably. With the iPhone processor that Macbook will most definitely lose both Thunderbolt ports. They might remain as USB4 ports but that iPhone SoC does not have enough PCIe lanes for two fully featured Thunderbolt 4 ports.
The MacBook Air starts at €1099 in Belgium. You can get them just under a thousand euros with a student discount.

Now, I'll be honest ... I can afford this. We probably both can, since we are here discussing Apple hardware on a forum. But, there's a lot of families out there that can't afford to spend €1100 on a computer.

Reducing specs considerably as you put it, is exactly what Apple should do for this device. It needs to run macOS and it shouldn't be crippled by 8gb of ram and/or 128gb of storage. So 12gb and 256gb minimum respectively. It doesn't need Thunderbolt ports. It should be crippled in the sense that it cannot drive external monitors. At least, that's what makes sense for me: if you need to drive external monitors, get the Air. It's as simple as that.

Offer it for €899 or - even better - €799. €300 difference on a purchase makes a huuuuuuge difference to a lot of people. By limiting the specs Apple can get their profits and people who struggle have a more affordable way to get rid of Windows.

What do you think?
 
This forum isn't the only place where a revamped Macbook with current specs (albeit low end) and current software support, is in high demand.
Maybe Apple is doing their homework, the same way they did with the Macbook pro redesign (More ports, better screen, etc).
They know that an entry level, cheaper Macbook is appealing to the newcomers, as well as people who owns a more powerful Macbook but wants a super portable cheap device to carry around as a secondary.

For instance, I wouldn't buy a 600USD M1 Air, but I would instantly buy a 600 USD 12" A18/A19
 
  • Like
Reactions: vielleicht
This forum isn't the only place where a revamped Macbook with current specs (albeit low end) and current software support, is in high demand.
Maybe Apple is doing their homework, the same way they did with the Macbook pro redesign (More ports, better screen, etc).
They know that an entry level, cheaper Macbook is appealing to the newcomers, as well as people who owns a more powerful Macbook but wants a super portable cheap device to carry around as a secondary.

For instance, I wouldn't buy a 600USD M1 Air, but I would instantly buy a 600 USD 12" A18/A19
Same here. No matter how cheap the M1 Air is, it is still too large(ish) and too powerful for what I expect from such a device.

12" would be pretty much an instant buy for me. Call it something netbook-ish in the 11"-12" size range that runs macOS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vielleicht
I think the new MacBook will be a 13" device with the A18 Pro SoC with 16 GB of RAM and 256/512 GB local storage options. It will use the N1 chip for Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6 access. It will likely have two USB Type C ports with USB 3.2 2x2 20 gigabit-per-second I/O support (no MagSafe connector though).
 
Why are people assuming this thing will have a 12" screen?

If low cost is a priority, it makes the most sense that they'd stick with panels they already use in huge numbers (basic 60hz 13" IPS displays).

13" is sort of the Goldilocks size and makes the most sense for what this device is purportedly targeted at in terms of entry level/education, etc.

12" is too small if it were to be the only option for their entry level, get people into the ecosystem, offering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: delsoul and navaira
No, I mean this is Apple, MBA sells for $999 and on a deal often for $799. Why would Apple mess around in a more budget laptop market than this and price themselves out of their markup they are known for? Doesn't sound like Apple to me. Have my doubts we see this.

The exception is if they add ports to MBA and push up the price and pitch it as more than it is now, and then they slide this new "budget" model into the lineup at around $999 (just below, not well below $1,000). That sounds more like something Apple might do.
I see your point. But consider that already there is talk about Apple bringing an OLED screen to the MBA. Some variation of what you’re talking about may already be underway. Especially if this new budget Ax-chipped MacBook will be available with only one build - one processor, one RAM spec and one SSD spec. Multiple colors notwithstanding. It could be built almost entirely with off-the-shelf parts. If anyone wants customization, there will be the MBA.
 
Offer it for €899 or - even better - €799.
If it's $799, it will be €929 and around €850-870 from some retailers.

Where does the idea of gimped macOS/iPadOS come from? I don't think Gurman/Kuo have ever suggested that, and the Mac Mini Developer Kit or whatever that was called was running full macOS on an Ax chip.

What worries me more is that this might really have 128 GB of storage and serve as an iCloud subscription driver. A subscription laptop would be ******tification.
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
If it's $799, it will be €929 and around €850-870 from some retailers.

Where does the idea of gimped macOS/iPadOS come from? I don't think Gurman/Kuo have ever suggested that, and the Mac Mini Developer Kit or whatever that was called was running full macOS on an Ax chip.

If by "gimped" you mean the notion that it would only run AppStore apps, that was mentioned by someone earlier in this thread.

What worries me more is that this might really have 128 GB of storage and serve as an iCloud subscription driver. A subscription laptop would be ******tification.

Agreed.
 
I belive that this will be targeted towards the parts of the education system that Google now dominates.
So it will probably be designed with primary and secondary schools in mind, not "normal" apple users.
Battery life = a school day. Storage = School work. etc etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: turbineseaplane
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.