I must say none of these music rumors are interesting to me. I think there's so many other things Apple should be spending their money on. To me music is so last decade and it blows my mind that Apple of all companies is so far behind in this space. Is there anything Apple could announce that would blow people away at this point? Is someone going to leave Spotify or Google Play Music because Apple's paying Pharrell big bucks to be a DJ on iTunes Radio? I doubt it.
I have doubts about this as well. My problem with Apple's approach to hiring these three artists as DJs seem to be a professional conflict of interest. Now, I've heard of these guys but don't listen to their music. Using them to curate music is problematic in the sense that they might curry favor to those already in the industry than those who are underground/independent. I'm also aware that NIN's frontman Trent Reznor is on contract at Apple working on iTunes but, to me, he's a professional musician. I've admired his early NIN work back in the day and haven't caught up to some of his latest stuff.
Fun fact is he lived in Shaker Heights, Ohio in Cleveland where I grew up. So he gets points for that. My concern is that being in a creative position to redesign iTunes as a streaming service might not justify what Apple is trying to pull off here. In other words, I'm unsure if he truly has a background in UI design in order to revamp it. Why didn't Apple approach someone else with actual professional credentials to do it?
So, what do we have here? They have literally FIVE artists in the company: Dr. Dre, Trent Reznor, Pharrell, Drake, and Guetta ranging from iTunes to iTunes Radio. Just because Apple has the money doesn't mean they should be using big name artists to make iTunes look good. And I think this might bite them in the a$$ eventually. Having 'big name' artists curate other music could be a conflict of interest.
Remember that Pharrell had in front of Apple's campus not too long ago where Cook danced like a goof? What was that concert for? I'd like to know because it wasn't well publicized on national news. I know Jobs has passed on but if he were alive, he wouldn't have allowed it and strictly put that concert during the Apple keynote, like he did in the past with U2 ( if memory serves me right ).
After all, they have to be paid by the company to be involved in the project and I'm sure they don't come cheap. What exactly of a deal did the iTunes "DJs" get in return for working at Apple? Something to think about because this reeks of Jimmy Iovine's hand in this.