Disclosing unit sales is important to investors. Apple is welcome to explain why those figures are no longer "relevant," but investors aren't required to view things the way Apple prefers. I think the 10% correction on that news sounds about right (and I say that without regard for reports of weak Xr sales).
I think that if you have nothing to hide, you can always show the unit sales. I don't think you can find an argument to prove it's better not to report the unit sales.
Obviously it's because Apple is selling a lot more older devices (iPhone 7, 6s in last year) than the new ones, because of the price. When the iPhone 7 came out, I have started to see them a lot in public 2-3 months after the launch. But iPhone X? Saw just bunch of people with iPhone X (since the launch).
I think you're right...it's just gotten so well timed, I think it definitely is related to stock price manipulation, but it's likely coming from sources outside of Apple.There is no one at Apple who would authorize a leak with the intent to manipulate the stock price so that Apple's shareholders would be enriched just a little bit by Apple getting better prices on its buyback program. What you are suggesting is a scheme that if discovered would result in the authorizing executives going to jail. Why would anyone take that risk just so their already very rich and successful company could be slightly more successful?
There are people who do securities fraud. Happens all the time. But they do it either (A) to save the company and their job or their investment or (B) so they can make 5x or 10x returns. Neither case applies here.
You might be the best I've seen at understanding Apple. Exactly right, wouldn't change a word.Not to this investor. I always thought it was ridiculous Apple reported unit sales when its competitors did not. Further that metric is used to manipulate the stock. If Apple missed an arbitrary number shares sank despite Apple meeting its own guidance. I wonder how many shares Buffet is buying on the dip.
[doublepost=1541455587][/doublepost]
Nobody else reports these numbers. Further Apple is one of the most manipulated stocks out there. Today’s story was the common Apple has reduced orders on phones, which is always by some anonomous source and has so far always been false.
Another popular form of manipulating is coming up with some arbitrary number for expected unit sales even when Apple provides a reasonable guidance range. When Apple meets the guidance it often is punished.
I’d think for competitive reasons alone I wouldn’t publish those numbers.
Apple again beat year over sales, satisfied its own guidance, but is punished for some arbitrary reason before it even said it was doing away with unit sales numbers.
I kinda wonder what Tim Cook did upon first hearing the news…
![]()
The market is saturated and at the moment there aren’t any major breakthroughs in technology to drive sales. Tim Cook is trying to maintain revenue by increasing prices.Apple has ordered additional plants for iPhone XR and XS to stop. They have ordered to make more older iPhone 8 models than initially expected. Demand isn’t there for the new phones. Major concern. Cash will be there for years and years after all the warning signs start showing up. That’s why they’re called warnings. Apple needs a new visionary and Cook isn’t it.
Why would anyone take that risk just so their already very rich and successful company could be slightly more successful?
There are people who do securities fraud. Happens all the time. But they do it either (A) to save the company and their job or their investment or (B) so they can make 5x or 10x returns. Neither case applies here.
That's the point; this jack-up-the-prices-cause-the-suckers-will-keep-buying strategy may work in the short term, but could cost them in the long run. Sure, they've convinced customers to pony up $1,000 or more on a phone (including me last year, though I couldn't believe I spent that much), but there are a few things that aren't obvious.
We used to be able to justify Apple's prices by saying, sure, Apple computers are expensive, but that's because they don't do the low end. For what they sell, though, they offer a fair price. Maybe we can get away with saying that for the iPhone XS, but who can look at the new Mac mini and honestly say that now?
- How much longer will people hold onto their phones, tablets, or computers because of the higher prices?
- How many people switched or will switch to competitors because of the higher prices?
- How many people never bought their first Apple phone, tablet, or computer, and thus will never buy their second, third, and so on because of the higher prices? In other words, how many people will not become loyal Apple customers, because they never became Apple customers to begin with?
- What price is too high of a price even for loyal Apple customers? $1,000? $1,500? $2,000?
I've been a die hard Apple user/customer since my dad bought an Apple II+ in the 1980s, but even I have my breaking point, as does every other customer. Lately, Apple seems like it's trying to find that breaking point, while the CFO seems like he doesn't care about the customers they lose; they're just paupers, anyway.
Well, I got in at $199.75 and an hour later it's $201.50 so I'm up!
Apple didn't fall short of anything on earnings. They far exceeded anyone's expectations for earnings in the last quarter.
Apple also did not fall short on revenue either. They exceeded their guidance and beat the street's estimates for revenue.
What they did, however, was to put out guidance that met with the street's consensus, which was raised over the last couple of months.
No. Amazon is down as well. They are getting their ass handed to themselves on the retail side of things.Is Amazon worth more now in market cap?
You'll be up 10% by next week. Excellent move!
It’s higher...he’s wrong or just wrote it wrong.How can that be right?
1,000,000 shares @$1000 each is $1,000,000,000
900,000 shares @$1000 each is $900,000,000
The fewer shares in circulation, the higher the individual shares have to be priced to reach a $1T valuation, surely?
Apple has ordered additional plants for iPhone XR and XS to stop. They have ordered to make more older iPhone 8 models than initially expected. Demand isn’t there for the new phones. Major concern. Cash will be there for years and years after all the warning signs start showing up. That’s why they’re called warnings. Apple needs a new visionary and Cook isn’t it.
if you look at actual data, iPhone unit sales have pretty much flattened out since the iPhone 6. The 6, 6s and 7 were all the same price, yet unit sales stayed relativity flat.Wouldn't surprise me if this is 'peak Apple' we are seeing. I don't see it dropping off the face of the earth but there is definitely a steady slow slide down. You cannot price your entire lineup at such levels and expect continued consumer interest and spending.
They make some great products but they're starting to be really overpriced.
Again when your top new smartphone goes from being around £650 (iPhone 6S) to £999 (iPhone X) you either have to be producing the greatest thing since sliced bread or your sales are going to take a hit. Again i understand Apple isn't chasing volumes like Android makers do, but even still, when you have wealthy guys who are tech enthusiasts like myself going eh, I'll pass this year yet again then maybe its time to start question if Time Cook is the guy to be leading Apple.
Apple stock isn’t going anywhere past the neighborhood it’s in as much as one may opine about it, imo. There is always churn with individual customers.Apple has been bricking all the older devices with hopes to make customers buy new ones. Well, this will not work, and we, the customers will bring apple down to below one hundred bucks a share. This is what Apple wants, and this is what Apple will get. What it deserves.
Cook isn’t going anywhere, except when he wants to.Apple has ordered additional plants for iPhone XR and XS to stop. They have ordered to make more older iPhone 8 models than initially expected. Demand isn’t there for the new phones. Major concern. Cash will be there for years and years after all the warning signs start showing up. That’s why they’re called warnings. Apple needs a new visionary and Cook isn’t it.
Good. Maybe this will teach them to be less greedy.
I bet if the unit sales numbers were climbing like rockets they would be ‘relevant’ again in a hurry.Disclosing unit sales is important to investors. Apple is welcome to explain why those figures are no longer "relevant," but investors aren't required to view things the way Apple prefers. I think the 10% correction on that news sounds about right (and I say that without regard for reports of weak Xr sales).
A company's whose Desktop Flagship Computer that looks like an office trash can and is 5 years old tech