I appreciate your response and offer the following:
As I am sure you know there are multiple autopsies at the moment that reflect a different cause of death. The second, which supports asphyxiation, was a "paid for" second opinion and as such could be questioned.
Source: https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2020/06/9849564/what-is-mechanical-asphyxia-meaning
I do not feel that it does not need to be murder, it might be. I simply challenged another's statement that it was murder when that has not been established. I felt the other poster was using the word murder to dramatize his point.
Ok, then how do we change the fact that african americans also commit a disproportionarely large number of crimes relative to their percentage of the population which increases their interactions with law enforcement?
Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/tables/table-43
Careful what you wish for... if this officer willingly committed premeditated murder in broad daylight while being filmed by multiple sources I see a temporary insanity plea coming.
Think about that, who would in broad daylight and while being filmed knowingly suffocate a person in that manner? If that was premeditated then that is one scary, insane individual.
IMHO the officer was simply an a**hole who pushed it too far and there is next to no way he won't pay the price but establishing "murder 1" will probably not happen.
Categorically untrue. An Autopsy was performed and there is video evidence from multiple viewpoints. You should be asking yourself why you feel you need it not to be murder (you are not the DA, needing to debate it does nothing).
As I am sure you know there are multiple autopsies at the moment that reflect a different cause of death. The second, which supports asphyxiation, was a "paid for" second opinion and as such could be questioned.
Source: https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2020/06/9849564/what-is-mechanical-asphyxia-meaning
I do not feel that it does not need to be murder, it might be. I simply challenged another's statement that it was murder when that has not been established. I felt the other poster was using the word murder to dramatize his point.
How you handle change for everyone is to address the ones affected most disproportionately first, which then makes wider sweeping changes easier.
Ok, then how do we change the fact that african americans also commit a disproportionarely large number of crimes relative to their percentage of the population which increases their interactions with law enforcement?
Source: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/tables/table-43
Officers are trained — he knew well what his actions were causing. You don't put your knee on someone's neck — even for a short period of time — as that is not a method of restraint authorized by the Police Code.
Careful what you wish for... if this officer willingly committed premeditated murder in broad daylight while being filmed by multiple sources I see a temporary insanity plea coming.
Think about that, who would in broad daylight and while being filmed knowingly suffocate a person in that manner? If that was premeditated then that is one scary, insane individual.
IMHO the officer was simply an a**hole who pushed it too far and there is next to no way he won't pay the price but establishing "murder 1" will probably not happen.