Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The issue is that a lot of us are waiting for replacements that we were offered and it is likely that they'll stop them because of articles like these getting out. So yes we were in the window and only found out through the forums, but we won't be getting new machines.

You already know you're not getting the replacement machine? Or you think you won't? Seems silly to freak out until you know for sure. Apple is normally pretty good about fulfilling their commitments. I'd think you still have a good chance of getting the replacement you were promised. I wish you luck.
 
Affected users will still be able to get their battery serviced in 15 business days though. That's not much longer than it is taking customers to be sent entirely new MacBook Pro models due to the part constraint. It's simply unfortunate that people aren't getting an essentially free MacBook Pro anymore, but that was merely a bonus, and Apple will still be helping customers that truly need their battery replaced for the exact same cost.

In fact, this puts an end to people who are buying eligible models off eBay or Craigslist just to take advantage of the chance to essentially trade up for cheap, and ensures that users who truly need battery service will receive that repair earlier than September 15, 2017, the original date that Apple quoted the part constraint ending on. Nevertheless, if you want to blame me, I understand.

I stand by my commitment to sharing valuable information with Apple readers, as is my job as a MacRumors contributor. I don't control Apple's subsequent actions.

A bonus that you ruined with your article. People which were genuinely affected were getting a cool bonus, completely unaware of it making of an amazing surprise. You post your article and what happened? A big flock of people running to Apple Stores all claiming with battery problems, which obviously caused Apple to back down. Way to go!!!
 
Joe,

Would you be able to update this post with new information for people who initiated an exchange prior to July 26? I went in yesterday and was told I'd be getting a replacement (they took my old computer) but am wondering if they'll honor it.
If I receive that information, I will share it. I actually fall into that category myself.
 
You already know you're not getting the replacement machine? Or you think you won't? Seems silly to freak out until you know for sure. Apple is normally pretty good about fulfilling their commitments. I'd think you still have a good chance of getting the replacement you were promised. I wish you luck.

There's been a post on the Reddit thread with someone who they've changed the machine replacement to a battery replacement, whilst still charging them. Apple are completely within their own right to instead give battery replacements if they have stock.

Thanks for the luck though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: NinjaHERO
Also everybody stop blaming MacRomours. Apple was loosing money they had to do something quick. Feel lucky for the people that got the replacement. This is basically a ebay crackdown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Konrad9
I can understand your frustration to some extent, but I won't apologize for sharing information that I believe is valuable to our readers. Apple sending out a new memo a few days later is beyond my control. I think something along the lines of "don't shoot the messenger" applies here.

Edit:

Affected users will still be able to get their battery serviced in 15 business days though. That's not much longer than it is taking customers to be sent entirely new MacBook Pro models due to the part constraint. It's simply unfortunate that people aren't getting an essentially free MacBook Pro anymore, but that was merely a bonus, and Apple will still be helping customers that truly need their battery replaced for the exact same cost.

In fact, this puts an end to people who are buying eligible models off eBay or Craigslist just to take advantage of the chance to essentially trade up for cheap, and ensures that users who truly need battery service will receive that repair earlier than September 15, 2017, the original date that Apple quoted the part constraint ending on. Nevertheless, if you want to blame me, I understand.

I stand by my commitment to sharing valuable information with Apple readers, as is my job as a MacRumors contributor. I don't control Apple's subsequent actions.

This is not MacRumors fault and I don't want them to change any policy in posting information like this. I got my 2014 MacBook Pro screen and battery replaced by reading MacRumors....same for my watch(battery expanded)....and my wife's iPhone6 (battery bulge). Frankly, they are doing Apple a service too, as I would have just thought none of these problems would have been covered due to out of warranty, etc. and just lived with the problem. This good customer service just strengthens my bond to Apple, Apple care.....and of course MacRumors.
 
Last edited:
Great job, macrumors. Literally ruined it.

A shortage of physical parts can't be remedied in 2 days - they actually had to manufacture new parts. MacRumors may have shed public light on an ongoing issue, but Apple's been working on a solution for quite a while (I mean, really - give away new Macs vs. manufacture new parts - how long would any manufacturer want to keep doing that?). Timing is a coincidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ_S and iMacC2D
They called me yesterday to confirm my replacement that should happen next week (and charge my credit card). They better not back down.... the computer had some other issues (random shut downs etc) so i don't really just want a replacement battery
They probably won’t back down, but you do realize that a battery replacement alone can fix random shut downs too?
 
This happen when Apple decided to glue everything and make everything unremovable. Use to you just open the back lid and replace a battery (wether a third party battery or first party battery).

Apple just want charge everything at inflated price and make repaired as difficult as possible.
 
No, you broke a goodfaith program that helped people in real need. This is the tragedy of the commons, plain and simple. You don't have to apologize but you're certainly at fault.

If MacRumors would not have reported this, I would not have rushed to the Apple Store yesterday. I was already on the wait-till-September-free-battery program for weeks (and also on Apple's free-screen-with-damaged-top-layer program). This means that I am one of these people in real need that was helped by Joe's article.

Of course the major credit goes to Apple. They have done an amazing job offering these replacement machines. Let's be honest, I understand their position.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DJ_S
The issue is that a lot of us are waiting for replacements that we were offered and it is likely that they'll stop them because of articles like these getting out. So yes we were in the window and only found out through the forums, but we won't be getting new machines.

The previous article could not have triggered Apple's change - if they could have snapped their fingers and instantly produced new parts (instead of giving away new computers), they would have done it months ago. It takes time to manufacture new parts. Apple knew they needed to do this quite a while ago, and started the process in motion. The new parts are now coming out of the manufacturing pipeline.

You may or may not get the replacement Mac - apparently the latest memo doesn't explain what to do about replacements that are already in progress - but that's not why you wanted the Mac repaired, is it? Either the battery was failing, or not.

Apple had a choice, either tell you, "Sorry, we can't repair this until we get new parts. New parts are being manufactured, and will be available in a couple of months," or they could say, "We understand you can't wait a couple of months until we have new parts, so here's the plan we've come up with..."
 
15 business days applies to batteries for Mid 2012 and Early 2013 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display models, which as far as I know are glued to the top case assembly. This is the part that has been severely constrained, according to Apple. 2014 models have a different battery setup that appears to be in stock per usual.

Excellent. Thanks for clarifying, Joe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe Rossignol
A shortage of physical parts can't be remedied in 2 days - they actually had to manufacture new parts. MacRumors may have shed public light on an ongoing issue, but Apple's been working on a solution for quite a while (I mean, really - give away new Macs vs. manufacture new parts - how long would any manufacturer want to keep doing that?). Timing is a coincidence.

Yeah I think some of the anger here is misplaced. I posted yesterday that MacRumors was a little late to the party and it seemed like Apple would be discontinuing this offer soon. If you've been following the story from reddit there were posts about the policy changing before the MacRumors post went up.

It's possible the MacRumors hastened the demise of the policy across all stores, but there's no way to know for sure.
 
So I understand the whining, people want websites to have integrity and report honestly EXCEPT if it hinders them personally from benefiting by reporting the truth. Does that sum up the hypocrisy being posted, or am I missing the point? Forgetting the fact that this direct causal relationship is determined to be fact exactly how?
 
Last edited:
Lovely. I have an appointment tonight to take my 2014 MBP in for service because of a swollen battery that's gotten progressively worse over the past six momths. The trackpad won't press down at all now and the lid won't close completely. The battery only has ~15 cycles on it because the computer is primarily stationary unless I travel. Battery condition is reported by macOS as "Normal".

I guess this means I might be waiting up to 15 business days for a battery replacement? Or does the article only apply to 2012 and 2013 models? My computer is still covered under AppleCare -- though it's nearing the end of coverage.

You've had a known problem with your Mac, that has gotten progressively worse over 6 months, and you didn't do anything about it? You read an article on the internet, and get excited that you can get something more than a simple battery replacement, and make an appointment at the store.

Question: If you hadn't read the article, would you have bothered to repair the Mac at this time, or would you have continued to live with the condition of your Mac until it because totally unusable? You knew the battery was swelling, and you apparently didn't make it a priority to replace it, before more damage could be done to your computer?

Yes, you may have to wait 15 days to have this repaired. Presumably, you assumed that, whenever you got around to bringing your Mac in for repair, Apple would have the part in stock and you could have the repair finished in much less than 15 days. Assuming any repair shop has the part you need in stock is risky business, as anyone who's ever had to have a car or major appliance fixed can attest.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.