Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So now, the SPLC is going to profit millions of dollars from the death of a woman in Charlottesville, did they hire the driver of the car? Qui bono?

I've seen a few silly posts in this thread, some hateful ones, some merely unkind ones, and happily quite a few sensible ones, but your post was one of the most ignorant ones I ran into in the first 250 posts to the thread. And it was even on the first page.

Just for your information:

The Southern Poverty Law Center is an American nonprofit legal advocacy organization specializing in civil rights and public interest litigation.

Anyway, congratulations. It was your post made me decide to kick in a dime per post to the SPLC based on the post count in this thread. I decided to drop back in now and then and check on whenever the thread got long enough to warrant the handshake between Apple and me on a transaction to benefit the SPLC.

I figure we're there now since the post count's over 250. Et voila, SPLC will surely be grateful for all the posts! Yeah even the anti-Apple posts, the anti-Cook ones, the anti-SPLC ones, the ones from people who got lost on the way to complaining about the weather, yada yada... and the SPLC will be grateful for my twenty-five bucks, too.

See this is a win-win for the SPLC. You post, and they get a dime.

It was clear from the outset there'd be a lot of posts to the thread, and I'm not made of money, else I'd have jacked up the per-post conribution. Be sure to bring all your pals around to post in here too, since I could probably scrounge up another $25 if you could find a couple hundred friends. Or, you know, even ten more posts would be another dollar from me to the SPLC.

Keep those posts coming, folks. Oh, and while I was at it, I decided to kick in a dime per post in this thread to the Anti-Defamation League as well. So anyone with any neoNazi pals, be sure to tell them to post in here too, if they can read, write and manage to get into the PRSI forum. Every dime to the ADL from anyone, even a neoNazi, will make the the ADL and America stronger. Another win-win. Either they get my dime or someone holds back on a nasty post lol.

Man I could be eating rice and beans for a long time behind this post... :D so be it.
 
Which is exactly the type of non-answer that he gave when directly asked.

Whether or not I watched the entire speech (I did) is irrelevant, and a common and classic deflection of the subject at hand when confronted with no BS, obvious truth.

There's no way to spin this. It "spins" itself.

Text of Trump's remarks on 8/12/17, the day of the Charlottesville Riots
(I've omitted the opening remarks for the VA Choice and Quality Employment Act signing ceremony)

*Please highlight the specific passages you find objectionable*

----
PRESIDENT TRUMP: But we're closely following the terrible events unfolding in Charlottesville, Virginia. We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides. It's been going on for a long time in our country. Not Donald Trump, not Barack Obama. This has been going on for a long, long time.

It has no place in America. What is vital now is a swift restoration of law and order and the protection of innocent lives. No citizen should ever fear for their safety and security in our society, and no child should ever be afraid to go outside and play, or be with their parents, and have a good time.

I just got off the phone with the Governor of Virginia, Terry McAuliffe, and we agreed that the hate and the division must stop, and must stop right now. We have to come together as Americans with love for our nation and true affection -- really -- and I say this so strongly -- true affection for each other.

Our country is doing very well in so many ways. We have record -- just absolute record employment. We have unemployment, the lowest it's been in almost 17 years. We have companies pouring into our country. Foxconn and car companies, and so many others, they're coming back to our country. We're renegotiating trade deals to make them great for our country and great for the American worker. We have so many incredible things happening in our country. So when I watch Charlottesville, to me it's very, very sad.

I want to salute the great work of the state and local police in Virginia -- incredible people -- law enforcement, incredible people -- and also the National Guard. They've really been working smart and working hard. They've been doing a terrific job. The federal authorities are also providing tremendous support to the governor. He thanked me for that. And we are here to provide whatever other assistance is needed. We are ready, willing, and able.

Above all else, we must remember this truth: No matter our color, creed, religion or political party, we are all Americans first. We love our country. We love our God. We love our flag. We're proud of our country. We're proud of who we are. So we want to get the situation straightened out in Charlottesville, and we want to study it. And we want to see what we're doing wrong as a country, where things like this can happen.

My administration is restoring the sacred bonds of loyalty between this nation and its citizens, but our citizens must also restore the bonds of trust and loyalty between one another. We must love each other, respect each other, and cherish our history and our future together. So important. We have to respect each other. Ideally, we have to love each other.
----
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRobinsonJr
Wouldn't adding some plaques to explain the historical significance of all this be of a much more valuable civic service? I think that kind of trumps (pun not intended) the emotional significance of those who'd rather forget. Sorry it happened, the statues got built, put them in their proper context rather than the head in the sand mentality. Its what grown-ups do, babies whine, stomp their feet and throw tantrums (or in this case rocks, bottles and urine).

You mean like all the statues of Hitler and other high ranking Nazis in Germany with context plaques?
 
lol. Wait, are you seriously suggesting that Obama citing implicit bias towards people of color (a phenomenon proven through lots and lots of scholarship) makes him racist?

I'm not suggesting, I'm showing that Obama trying to cite an example of his grandmother's racism, ironically demonstrates his own racism.

'White' people is a slur, and though popular, still an ignorant slur. Can you identify colors correctly? You read what he wrote and blew right past the 'white' people remark and thought, there's nothing wrong with a) using racial slurs against a group, and b)there's nothing wrong with denigrating an entire group that Obama defines with racial slurs based on the completely ignorant misidentification of actual skin color.

So which is it ladies and gentlemen, are you really for equality and anti-racial discrimination? Or do you want to play games trying to deny your own biases? Hint: this is your second opportunity to gracefully back away from the subject of discrimination.
 
So which is it ladies and gentlemen, are you really for equality and anti-racial discrimination? Or do you want to play games trying to deny your own biases? Hint: this is your second opportunity to gracefully back away from the subject of discrimination.

I think white people need to be knocked down a few pegs and I’m white. I don’t consider myself a SJW. It’s just long overdue. White pride in its current form is largely about being butt hurt over potentially losing the throne on the top of the mountain, and most likely those most vocal about it did/do nothing to put or keep the throne there. Its genetic entitlement.
 
I'm not suggesting, I'm showing that Obama trying to cite an example of his grandmother's racism, ironically demonstrates his own racism.

'White' people is a slur, and though popular, still an ignorant slur. Can you identify colors correctly? You read what he wrote and blew right past the 'white' people remark and thought, there's nothing wrong with a) using racial slurs against a group, and b)there's nothing wrong with denigrating an entire group that Obama defines with racial slurs based on the completely ignorant misidentification of actual skin color.

So which is it ladies and gentlemen, are you really for equality and anti-racial discrimination? Or do you want to play games trying to deny your own biases? Hint: this is your second opportunity to gracefully back away from the subject of discrimination.


LOL
 
You mean like all the statues of Hitler and other high ranking Nazis in Germany with context plaques?

So you'd go to Rome and knock down statues of barbaric slave owning torturous emperors too? Are Germany and other European countries ready to take the tourism hits to be consistent in removing statues and art for brutal regimes and figures? They've got a whole lot of blood thru a whole lot of colonialism they'd need to be sweeping art up after. No?

My opinion: Germany was not founded on the principal of free speech. Also I don't live there, so I don't really care what kind of art they have, as long Americans don't have to die fixing the wreckage of their feudal and early feudal/industrial blunders for them again.

Its all emotionally charged jive. Frankly if Eric The Red or Ghengis Khan brutally conquerred an area I lived in, a statue to them would be great, so myself and others could read and learn a little something about them.

Both good and bad figures of historical significance would serve as great civic historical markers. The solution is likely more statues than less. Walk thru a town, see all the statues and get a sense of its history. But your side is too bent on lashing out to think that intelligently or enlightened. Frankly, you're embarrassing yourselves and demonstrating the regressive dangers of group-think.
[doublepost=1503441912][/doublepost]

Thought so. And looks like you're all spent here.
[doublepost=1503442024][/doublepost]
I think white people need to be knocked down a few pegs and I’m white. I don’t consider myself a SJW. It’s just long overdue. White pride in its current form is largely about being butt hurt over potentially losing the throne on the top of the mountain, and most likely those most vocal about it did/do nothing to put or keep the throne there. Its genetic entitlement.

I can guarantee, you are not 'white'. Nobody is. Crayons... get some, compare to your arm. Might want to grab some tissue, because you're going to be in for a shock.
 
Last edited:
And Sill cast this down in the middle of the thread like a gauntlet, stared smugly in @LizKat's direction and then turned and logged out.

Boom!

Probably because its so false that no one has felt the need to respond. However, you've brought it up at least twice, and now Dagless is parroting you, so I guess it needs to be responded to.

https://www.axios.com/the-year-that-confederate-statues-were-erected-2474424759.html

If you disagree, perhaps you could show your proof to the publishers of that site.

I've read through eleven pages of posts and couldn't possibly quote and respond to every one that stood out, so I'll have to post cold here. Excuse me for what may seem like a rambling group of thoughts. It probably is, but I'm just trying to explain and defuse a lot of what is going on here with history. Regarding these monuments and the opportunistic trouble surrounding them, I want to offer folks some information that I hope they reflect on and perhaps get a better perspective of current events and the dangers we now face. For those of you who are so used to hanging labels on people as a way to avoid debating things, feel free to call me a Nazi white supremacist Trump supporter and go on with your life, blissfully ignorant to the damage you do to society as a whole, all while claiming you "did something" by refusing to accept my viewpoint. Above all, have fun.

For those few here who have repeatedly mentioned that these Confederate monuments were erected to intimidate black families, you would not be accurate. Most of them were not paid for by state or local governments to support Jim Crow laws, but in large part paid for by private organizations including the United Daughters of the Confederacy, the United Confederate Veterans, and Sons of Confederate Veterans. They have prominent display in public places because they are memorials to war dead, and not memorials to slavery. Any statement to the contrary is the viewer projecting their own views on those memorials, or worse, listening to groups seeking to use the issue of slavery to further their own ends.

One of our esteemed posters mentioned early on that calling the war between the states a "battle for states rights" was simply semantics and that it was purely to ensure slavery, and then he posted links to the 1861 Confederate Constitution as proof. If you want to speak of semantics, then you should be right at home with that argument. Pay no attention to the tariff debates prior to the secession, go look for proof in a document generated post-secession. If a few lines like that would be some kind of obvious proof that the south was seceding to protect slavery, then you should have a field day with Lincoln's obvious distaste for the slaves as a species, all spoken prior to secession. Lincoln repeatedly said blacks were incapable of equaling whites, as they were obviously a different species. This was both his view and a reflection of the northern mentality of the times. He pushed not for emancipation, but for northern-style abolition, where the slaves would be forcibly seized and deported outside of the Union. Southern-style abolition, on the other hand, largely dealt with manumission, where the slave was freed arbitrarily, or purchased and then freed by charity, or freed after a labor schedule was fulfilled. I should point out that there were contrarian movements on both sides of the line, with northerners favoring southern-style freedom and vice-versa. To deny this would be to play into yet another version of the "North vs South" paradigm, where each side projects evil on the other side. I have no intention of subscribing to the buzz-word bingo that is part of the current public discourse.

I'll further mention Lincoln's well documented support for keeping slavery in the slave states, and he supported a Constitutional amendment that would enshrine slavery in US law. If the so-called slave states wanted support for slavery in the Union government, they need look no further than old "Honest Abe". So why would they leave that? Most likely because of the steel import tariffs that Lincoln promised Pennsylvania steel interests that he would pursue with armed force if necessary. Those tariffs would prevent cheaper UK steel from entering southern ports, thereby hitting their already fragile economy even harder, while protecting those Pennsylvania factories.
It should be noted that initially, only four states seceded, and that secession was largely related to military threats to collect the tariff. When the Union military was mobilized against those four states, the rest of the states involved in the debate decided to vote to rebel.

During the war, Lincoln authorized his rabid generals - most notably William Sherman - to pursue the war as they saw fit, without regard to the people. Sherman's troops looted and raped their way across Georgia in a march that today would be prosecuted as a war crime. Its especially criminal when the slaves they were allegedly freeing also died, as they were left without shelter or provision to die in the approaching winter. While Lincoln was publicly lamenting that "brother would kill brother" in the war, his generals had troops marching under orders to treat the southerners as lower than the lowest animal, and Johnny Reb's noncombatant family members were considered fair game.

Estimates of southern war dead range from 600,000 to over 900,000, and was quite possibly much higher. A large portion of the dead were civilians including women and children, as well as slaves.

I'd like to point out that as was mentioned earlier, many of those slaves were sold into the slave markets by tribes that conquered other tribes in Africa and had deals with the Portuguese, Spanish, Dutch, and British slavers. Some of those slaves were sold into the south (and the north too, don't forget that slavery began in the north as the result of a northern court decision and then spread to the south) in domestic slave markets owned and run by blacks, and some of them were bought by black plantation owners. For that matter, there were also freed slaves who fought for the Confederacy, as well as born-free blacks who also fought for the Confederacy, voluntarily. That is once of those "inconvenient truths" that gets buried by the NAACP at every turn.

Much is made of the KKK and Nathan Bedford Forrest being a former Confederate general. Not much is said about the societal unrest that brought about the formation of the KKK. The US federal authority that occupied the states in rebellion banned white southern males from holding public office or voting. They brought in northerners to hold those offices - the famous "carpetbaggers". They also built up a bureaucracy at least partially staffed with blacks, as a further salt in the wound. While there were men in the KKK as well as out of it who would have looked down on blacks no matter what station they occupied in life - just as there are now - that view coalesced around Forrest's movement to launch a guerrilla war against what they perceived as further northern force being visited against their lives, especially damaging since these were lives lived under occupation, that lasting for two decades under what was known as "Reconstruction". This Union policy tried to rebuild southern society around northern ideals, and was a lasting contributor towards future racism.

(cue the slavering buzzword hordes: "Did he just blame the north for the creation of the KKK? Does he not know they were all southerners? It doesn't matter what the north did, the south was evil!!" No, I didn't blame the north. I blamed the Reconstruction policies. The southerners did not have to raise arms against this in aggression, especially on innocent families. People reach a breaking point, and they do evil things. After four years of war and devastation that were the result of a peaceful seccession, perhaps they were done with seeking peaceful resolution. I don't defend it, I simply try to understand it and not have a knee-jerk response.)

I want people to think about this, and not just throw up some knee-jerk response. When people are forced to do something they don't want to do, resentment builds. People have pride, and when that pride is injured, they will respond irrationally in some cases. Right now we have a movement built largely around hysteria, stating that open display of the Confederate memorials is tacit approval of racism. "How is that so?" one wonders, and the answer one gets is "because the south favored slavery, and the north fought to free the slaves". Yet it isn't true. There are people who swear the south was out to have slavery for generations to come - including at least one person here - but that is also not true. Jefferson Davis was at the forefront of a group who wanted to end slavery within 30 years, and they wanted to have a plan to do it, and not just dump tens of thousands of slaves on the labor market at once. Doing so would displace low-skilled white labor as former slaves would take any wage to survive. Davis and his fellow countrymen seemed to realize the danger that would pose, i.e. resentment amongst whites.

I feel this is very similar to the debate that is had in political circles regarding public welfare. It simply should not have ever existed. I and many others want it to disappear. But what of the needy people that depend on it, and aren't there to game the system? What happens to them if the rug is pulled out from under them in one move? How is that any different from slavery ending in a moment, and then dumping tens of thousands of uneducated people on the labor market, with no capital resources and no marketable skills? Obviously there has to be an exit strategy. So would fighting a war to "free" welfare recipients be the answer? Or should there be some plan to eliminate welfare over a generation that would minimize the damage to the people and the economy?

(Cue the hordes: "He just equated welfare recipients with slaves! Racist!!!" No, I just pointed to similarities in circumstance between slavery and welfare as institutions, not as similarities in the human quality of slaves and welfare recipients. Nothing more. Move along.)

How is it that this isn't taught in schools? Why is it so important for the north to portrayed as saints and the south as devils? Does it have anything to do with the military adventurism that came from that victorious north over succeeding generations? The subjugation of Indian tribes? Teddy Roosevelt's not-so-hidden threat against the entire world in the form of the Great White Fleet? The involvement in the destruction of lawful governments and the establishment of puppet states in over fifty nations worldwide? Yet the south is the villain, right? Southern armies were just a few miles away from DC at one point in the war, and if this was truly a war to control the government (the definition of a "civil war"), then they could have ended it there. They didn't. This was a war for self-determination, which regardless of some of the components of that, was an honorable thing.

Right now, there are public figures (and some not-so-public) who are using this debate over memorials as a hot wire to achieve some other aims. The uneducated responses I see to daily activity in our country points to this. How in the world did people come to associate Donald Trump with Fascism? First, it indicates that the majority of people have no idea what the term means, with the first letter either capitalized or not. Second, asking them to explain it brings up a litany of responses related to his tax returns, his morals, his business acumen, or some nebulous perceived Russian influence - in short, nothing at all related to fascism. I believe that this is just a learned acclimatization to Trump's pillory in the mainstream press. If you believe the (well documented) story about Operation Mockingbird, then this demonization gets a whole lot scarier. (For the record, if you want a textbook example of fascism, that bundling together of private industry and public office, look at the aforementioned alliance between Lincoln and the Pennsylvania steel companies. Irony of ironies...)

(For full disclosure, I don't like Trump, I don't dislike Trump. I voted for him on one single plank of his platform, which was ending foreign military adventurism and establishing peaceful trade relations with all nations, sort of identical to that which many of the founding fathers espoused. I find it terrible that he has been so far prevented from exercising that part of his platform, largely by the current Russia scare that is being beaten to death. Anything that he does that goes against the four terms of the militarist BushObama agenda can be credited to his obvious "ties to Russia/Putin", and his move is deflated. Any member of the legislature that independently agrees to back him, or at least deviate from the current adventurist hysteria, is called "Putin's favorite". Trump talks peace with other nations, he's their puppet. He bombs Syria, he's acting like a "true American". How disgusting, yet so obviously telling about the mentality in this country. )

Further, how is it that the people who are waving swastika flags are Nazis? Because they say they are? Because others say they are? They have nothing to do with the original Nazi organization, not even tangentially. They're more like a cult of personality. Their planks distill out all the most rabid stuff from the politics and infrastruction of the Nazis and use them like a weapon against people. They hate Jews, they hate blacks, they adore Hitler, they... what else? I doubt even they could tell you. The fact that the organized ones cling together wearing clothes that were outdated by 1950 or so should tell you something. They're just another buzzword slavering horde, and its more identity politics. There aren't that many of them, and their number wouldn't grow if they weren't such a hot issue right now. Uneducated people looking to be part of something that will give them a voice will now be interested in joining. No different than the violent socialist movements in liberal arts colleges, or the gangs that spring up in low income areas.

I'd like to close - for those of you who were able to read to the end - by saying that in a free country, every idea has to be up for debate. You cannot say "its settled" and then refuse to talk about it, or demonize anyone who wants to raise the issue again, and say you're in favor of free speech. I find it very disheartening to see how far people have drifted away from the Socratic method, where ideas were constantly discussed and refined, and towards a polarized ideology where good and evil can somehow be projected on to every discussion, with prizes for the winners as established by virtue consensus. Its gotten to the point where you can't talk about the Autobahn anymore without first offering a disclaimer stating you don't hold Nazi ideology. You can't talk about education without talking about giving people a "safe space". And you definitely can't talk about how people died to support individual determination without first accusing them of racism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LizKat
Well then, I guess we all know which side you're on. Lets just say I check the "white" box on forms, so am I considered self-hating now lol? The reason we're using the "white" term is because it's all over the news. There are these "white" supremacists that are currently having a hissy fit about some statues.

So because others use racial slurs, its cool for you to use them in public conversation too? If you were unaware before, you now might want to consider this a teachable moment and contemplate your own prejudices, and be an example rather than a furtherance of racial discrimination.

Isn't it weird you identify color properly on everything else except your own as maybe others' skin? If you ordered a white shirt on Amazon, and were sent one the actual color of your skin, you'd likely be upset they got the order wrong. If we're to get anywhere further on equality, dropping the ignorance at step one, would be a big help. We're all a lot closer on the color spectrum, than these terms portrait. Can you handle that truth?

Also, where did I say what they're doing is helping anything? I just said they were forced to join.
.

Which is why I said 'horse ****'. They weren't forced by any stretch of imagination. They rushed to judgement and took a side without thinking.

My side? Clearly you haven't been comprehending what I wrote. 'Sides' are the problem. Go back, try again.
 
So you'd go to Rome and knock down statues of barbaric slave owning torturous emperors too? Are Germany and other European countries ready to take the tourism hits to be consistent in removing statues and art for brutal regimes and figures? They've got a whole lot of blood thru a whole lot of colonialism they'd need to be sweeping art up after. No?

My opinion: Germany was not founded on the principal of free speech. Also I don't live there, so I don't really care what kind of art they have, as long Americans don't have to die fixing the wreckage of their feudal and early feudal/industrial blunders for them again.

Its all emotionally charged jive. Frankly if Eric The Red or Ghengis Khan brutally conquerred an area I lived in, a statue to them would be great, so myself and others could read and learn a little something about them.

Both good and bad figures of historical significance would serve as great civic historical markers. The solution is likely more statues than less. Walk thru a town, see all the statues and get a sense of its history. But your side is too bent on lashing out to think that intelligently or enlightened. Frankly, you're embarrassing yourselves and demonstrating the regressive dangers of group-think.
[doublepost=1503441912][/doublepost]

Thought so. And looks like you're all spent here.
[doublepost=1503442024][/doublepost]

I can guarantee, you are not 'white'. Nobody is. Crayons... get some, compare to your arm. Might want to grab some tissue, because you're going to be in for a shock.

So you want a statue of Osama Bin Laden at the base of the twin towers? You're making less and less sense by each post you make.

BTW, Germany DID take down all Nazi based statues and anything related to Hitler. Somehow I don't think they've forgotten about it. We don't need monuments in our face to remember our history. That's what books are for. I suppose those that are so upset about the statues have difficulty reading, but there's help out there for them.
 
And Sill cast this down in the middle of the thread like a gauntlet, stared smugly in @LizKat's direction and then turned and logged out.

Boom!

Yeah I was thinking, while reading that one... that I might have to take off my "wall of text" crown in his honor? :D

Saved my crown by the tl;dr impulse halfway through it.
If I didn't read it, it didn't happen. :rolleyes:

I can dish it out but can't always take it, and will be the first to admit that in a thread like this, where it's quantity of posts, not post-length that counts. I mean Sill only gave (indirectly, via my dime-a-post contributions) the SPLC and ADL a total of 20c by that essay, as worthy as it may have been of a read to the end....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gutwrench
I could be wrong but aren't they quite a hateful borderline racist group? Why would Apple support this?

I wish Apple stayed out of politics.

It's what you do when you're not shipping products or worse, shipping products that your target market doesn't want.
Nothing more than that, and frankly ill-considered in this case. Apple should not be associating with SPLC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amegicfox
sadly more then 50% of Apple's employee are stuck and don't deserve the abuse of a communist leftist marxist globalist CEO

SPLC is a hate group and Tim Crook needs to go
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: tgara
lowendlinux: But they aren't and he won't..so what are you going to do?

because Apple has 116,000 employees and more then 50% disagree with Tim's marxist agenda

Also Tim Crook propaganda goes against the interests of 50% of Apple customers
 
lowendlinux: But they aren't and he won't..so what are you going to do?

because Apple has 116,000 employees and more then 50% disagree with Tim's marxist agenda

Also Tim Crook propaganda goes against the interests of 50% of Apple customers
Over half might disagree but not enough to quit and Apples consumers are religious so there not going to go. Last year when conservative investors asked about the ROI of green energy Cook told them to pound sand. So apparently his conservative investors and his alt-right and conservative customers don't care that much or are not the 50% you claim. Cool has decided to live by the sword so the second he doesn't produce he's gone, it's just business.

Please carry on whining, complaining,and hitting the table since everytime you do he put six figures on his bank account and people flock to buy Apple junk.
 
Text of Trump's remarks on 8/12/17, the day of the Charlottesville Riots

Above all else, we must remember this truth: No matter our color, creed, religion or political party, we are all Americans first. We love our country. We love our God. We love our flag. We're proud of our country. We're proud of who we are. So we want to get the situation straightened out in Charlottesville, and we want to study it. And we want to see what we're doing wrong as a country, where things like this can happen.

My administration is restoring the sacred bonds of loyalty between this nation and its citizens, but our citizens must also restore the bonds of trust and loyalty between one another. We must love each other, respect each other, and cherish our history and our future together. So important. We have to respect each other. Ideally, we have to love each other.
----

It all sounds very good, but by not answering a simple question, a gimme really, it shows he CAN'T do what he says in bold above, because of WHO he is.

If you cannot say, as a President, straight up: "NO. I do not appreciate, recognize, or tolerate the support of white supremacists. I abhor the notion and the implication."

That motherfrakker is a COWARD and a rich, entitled PUNK at best. At worst, he is what David Duke says he is.

NOTHING in his speech justifies his silence. NOTHING.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LizKat and LordVic
sadly more then 50% of Apple's employee are stuck and don't deserve the abuse of a communist leftist marxist globalist CEO

SPLC is a hate group and Tim Crook needs to go

no, Cook should stay. Apple's making a mint every time out the box.

lol tim cook a commie leftist marxist globalist CEO... that's rich

even marx rolls in his grave behind that idea.

and ka-ching, your post donated 10c more to the SPLC thanks to my pledge.

win win win for the SPLC and ADL too. they each get a dime, or they don't read a post like yours or they get the dime and a nice post like mine :D
 
Anyone remember this old chestnut from just a little over 2 years ago? Apple hasn't been a fan of history for some time, removing historical civil war games that aren't even glamorizing but depicting the confederacy/confederate flag where it has objective relevance to the subject matter. It'd be like if MS/Sony were pulling the plug on Wolfenstein, M-rating aside since they are cool with M-rating games in general, merely because nazis/swastikas are in it but of course not glamorized/glorified either

https://www.macrumors.com/2015/06/25/apple-removes-civil-war-games-confederate-flag/

Apple Removes Civil War Games From App Store Over Confederate Flag Usage [Updated]
 
I've been looking up what nazi supporters have claimed about SPLC being a hate group themselves. It turns out they're not, so it's strange to see these people label SPLC as such. It's possible to not like something but not lie about it.

This story popped up in my News app. SPLC seem good to me/everyone else Lawsuit against Daily Stormer is stuck; founder can’t be served papers - Ars Technica
https://apple.news/A88HuA4kJRoSnRPakZc584Q
[doublepost=1503477672][/doublepost]
Anyone remember this old chestnut from just a little over 2 years ago? Apple hasn't been a fan of history for some time, removing historical civil war games that aren't even glamorizing but depicting the confederacy/confederate flag where it has objective relevance to the subject matter. It'd be like if MS/Sony were pulling the plug on Wolfenstein, M-rating aside since they are cool with M-rating games in general, merely because nazis/swastikas are in it but of course not glamorized/glorified either

https://www.macrumors.com/2015/06/25/apple-removes-civil-war-games-confederate-flag/

Apple Removes Civil War Games From App Store Over Confederate Flag Usage [Updated]
That tells us Apple have always been good eggs, and that they're not jumping on the bandwagon.

Also it's very interesting you say they're editing history. Others have addressed the "editing" part of your argument for quite some time, and yet…

Edit: I've been saying for a while that "people don't like nazis". I should expand that. People don't like white supremacists either. History won't be edited. But history won't be kind to supporters of fascism.
 
Just admit it, you're buying into Russian propaganda by believing RT is a credible news source. There are piles of information clearly showing it's financially supported and directed by the Kremlin. Enjoy what the Russians are feeding you.

Who said I was "buying into RT"? Every news outlet is backed by someone. All news is propaganda.
 
All news is propaganda.

If you believe that, then the actual purveyors of propaganda regarding "fake news, fake news!" have got their hooks into your brain pretty deeply.

LOL there's still time to subscribe to a local paper that you can fact-check yourself, by stepping down to the police station and reading the blotters yourself to see if little Joey next door really got busted for disturbing the peace last night. Or was that you reported him? Even better, no need to fact-check if you're pretty sure that was Joey making that noise out there.

See how that works? Of course it takes a lot of time to fact check stuff happens on the other side of town. Eventually most of us have come to trust mainstream media outlets to report the facts of a situation and let us come to our own conclusions about whether those facts support our opinions or suggest we have another look at how we view the world. After all, mainstream media are fact-checked and fact-checked again and have proven themselves willing to entertain suggestions from the public that this or that article contains errors of fact or omission.

On topic: how mainstream media report Apple's business seems more reliable than some of the figures I see thrown around in this thread.

Apple has 116,000 employees and more then 50% disagree with Tim's marxist agenda

Also Tim Crook propaganda goes against the interests of 50% of Apple customers

Marx is dead and not around to defend his agenda from people who have not understood it...

Not going to ask where you got those 50% stats from, since I can only imagine.

Tim Cook's propaganda? It's rare we even get to hear Tim comment on upcoming product lines and anyway more fun to read all the rumors (even if some of those are propaganda lol). I grant you his keynotes are at least 50% pitch but what's a keynote for, I always download them even if I'm flat broke w/ no intention of making an Apple gear buy... road to hell for me always starts by saying it can't hurt to watch a keynote... :rolleyes:

As for "propaganda" about the SPLC or the ADL for that matter, if you don't care for the work such organizations do, then don't support them. If it bothers you Apple offers people an easy way to contribute to any non-profit organization when they do one of their occasional contribution facilitation gigs, like after Hurricane Katrina for instance, don't buy your next smartphone from them. Usually people hang their hardware decisions more on the performance and specs of the gear they're shopping for. But hey, it's a free country.

Bottom line imo Apple helps keep the country free by this round of facilitating contributions to the SPLC. But it's ok to ignore the little blurb on their iTunes site about it if you feel differently. Why not hit up the 99c rentals while you're there though? You never know if you might have missed a good flick.

Most people don't criticize white shoe law firms for their pro bono legal work --- au contraire, usually those firms get hammered for getting paid to help defend the likes of tobacco companies or :eek: corporate polluters-- so why criticize Apple for helping the SPLC work towards remedying economic injustices like predatory payday lenders, or helping ensure children's rights when they encounter our justice system?

SPLC does much more than just keep track of groups that spout hate from one end the day to another. Check out their website some time, can even see the docket numbers of cases they have active in court now.
 
Edit: I've been saying for a while that "people don't like nazis". I should expand that. People don't like white supremacists either. History won't be edited. But history won't be kind to supporters of fascism.

Minor update: People don't like ANY group that considers itself 'superior' to others. History won't be kind to any of them.
 
So you'd go to Rome and knock down statues of barbaric slave owning torturous emperors too? Are Germany and other European countries ready to take the tourism hits to be consistent in removing statues and art for brutal regimes and figures? They've got a whole lot of blood thru a whole lot of colonialism they'd need to be sweeping art up after. No?

My opinion: Germany was not founded on the principal of free speech. Also I don't live there, so I don't really care what kind of art they have, as long Americans don't have to die fixing the wreckage of their feudal and early feudal/industrial blunders for them again.

Its all emotionally charged jive. Frankly if Eric The Red or Ghengis Khan brutally conquerred an area I lived in, a statue to them would be great, so myself and others could read and learn a little something about them.

Both good and bad figures of historical significance would serve as great civic historical markers. The solution is likely more statues than less. Walk thru a town, see all the statues and get a sense of its history. But your side is too bent on lashing out to think that intelligently or enlightened. Frankly, you're embarrassing yourselves and demonstrating the regressive dangers of group-think.
[doublepost=1503441912][/doublepost]

Thought so. And looks like you're all spent here.
[doublepost=1503442024][/doublepost]

I can guarantee, you are not 'white'. Nobody is. Crayons... get some, compare to your arm. Might want to grab some tissue, because you're going to be in for a shock.

You responded to my first comment with a broad stroke brush and then your response to my second comment is extremely specific and deflecting to fit your narrative. That’s fine. Maybe you should be in politics if you aren’t already.

Honestly I don’t care about these statues either way and I can see both views. Mostly it’s just one of many red herrings that corporations, the rich, and the government love because it keeps us distracted while they continue to economically rape and pillage.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.