Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I'm in a similar boat. I already have an M1 Max MBP but wanted something lighter. The MBP is currently "tied" to a desk with two monitors, so it's a bit inconvenient to disconnect and take through the house or on short trips, so I was looking for something lighter without needing the power the M1 Max gives me.
If you have everything connected through a dock, it's just one cable to disconnect. The dock would charge the MBP at the same time. Even with a MBA M2, you'd probably have it plugged into power.

I only have one external monitor, but it is a Samsung S80A with USB-C connection and 90W charging, so everything goes through that one cable w/o needing even a dock.
 
If you have everything connected through a dock, it's just one cable to disconnect. The dock would charge the MBP at the same time. Even with a MBA M2, you'd probably have it plugged into power.

I only have one external monitor, but it is a Samsung S80A with USB-C connection and 90W charging, so everything goes through that one cable w/o needing even a dock.
My set up is rather complicated. I actually have an OWC Thunderbolt 4 dock connected to it AND the power cable along with an HDMI cable (one of my monitors is an LG 42" C2 TV, which for some reason can only do 4K30 through Thunderbolt, but can do 4K60 through HDMI). The dock doesn't supply enough power at only 60 watts so it loses power without at least a 96 watt power supply plugged in. I also have a 2.5Gbps ethernet dongle plugged in because my dock doesn't have an ethernet port. Even if it did, it probably wouldn't be 2.5Gbps.
 
Fan noise. Or lack thereof.
I can honestly say that I've never heard the fan on my MBP 14. Never. But it's nice to know that it has a fan if I were to need to push it to max performance, instead of throttling down performance on an overheated, fanless MBA.

But I'd be guessing if you were doing something extreme enough to turn on the fans, that a MBA probably wouldn't be your target product.
 
My set up is rather complicated. I actually have an OWC Thunderbolt 4 dock connected to it AND the power cable along with an HDMI cable (one of my monitors is an LG 42" C2 TV, which for some reason can only do 4K30 through Thunderbolt, but can do 4K60 through HDMI). The dock doesn't supply enough power at only 60 watts so it loses power without at least a 96 watt power supply plugged in. I also have a 2.5Gbps ethernet dongle plugged in because my dock doesn't have an ethernet port. Even if it did, it probably wouldn't be 2.5Gbps.
Yes, that does sound a bit complicated. :)
 
What is your justification of maxing the RAM on the MBA M2 instead of getting a more powerful 14" MBP M1?
The 14" MacBook Pro is too large and bulky. It weighs almost 1 pound more than the M2 MacBook Air. It gets much worse battery life. It has a fan. I use my M1 MacBook Air to develop software (reactjs right now) and the M1 has plenty of power. The lack of a fan only throttles a bit after several minutes of high intensity CPU use. For my purposes the M2 MBA is much better since I don't really encounter high intensity CPU very often. When I do, it slows down by 15%, big deal. The only issue is that if I need a lot of containers, then 16 GB can be a bit small. I haven't run into any problems yet but another 8 GB will make me not have to think about it.
 
MBA with 24GB of RAM doesn't make sense, it's a high amount of RAM with not very high processing power (only 4 performance cores with no active cooling).

If you have high RAM needs you also have high CPU needs, so go to the MBP 14" 32GB, you also get a better screen (120 Hz), more ports, much better speakers. Or be patient and wait for the 15" MBA or the MBP M2 14".
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. The M1 is a very fast SoC. The 4 performance cores are adequate for my use (software development using ReactJS right now). I use a couple of Docker containers and those can eat up RAM pretty fast. Right now 16 GB has been fine but I want a little more room for future needs.

What I don't want is a 3.5 pound twice as thick laptop with worse battery life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad4WDW and Wokis
Oh, it definitely makes sense. It just doesn’t make sense to you.

Yep. I chose the 24GB because Microsoft Office Suite is an absolute memory hog. I am consistently in Outlook, Excel, Teams, Zoom, Multiple Safari tabs, Adobe Acrobat, PowerPoint and iMessage. That workflow eclipses the 16GB usage mark. I'm consistently hitting 20-21GB. I have 32GB ram on my 16" MBP M1 Pro so haven't had issues but 16GB or less scared me. 24GB was a must.
 
I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion.
Because I have a M1 MBA, a 2019 MBP 16" i7, and a Dell G15 Ryzen7 5800H RTX3060.

All three have 16GB of RAM.

On a Handbrake encoding (x265, "slower" preset) I get:

2.3 fps on the M1 MBA
2.7 fps on the 2019 MBP 16" i7
4.5 fps on the Dell Ryzen7

The Dell takes 5 hours, the MBA takes 10 hours to finish the job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mi7chy
By "doubling" I hope you mean "512GB or higher," because 10 core/16/512 is what I went with since I have yet to ever go above 300GB thanks to a 16TB Synology NAS.
I’m seeing mostly 512 and 1 TB orders here in the thread. Then again, Macrumors is a unique environment of users into Apple products. The average user might just go with the base config unless they visit an Apple store and are encouraged by staff there to double the storage on the base model.
 
Because I have a M1 MBA, a 2019 MBP 16" i7, and a Dell G15 Ryzen7 5800H RTX3060.

All three have 16GB of RAM.

On a Handbrake encoding (x265, "slower" preset) I get:

2.3 fps on the M1 MBA
2.7 fps on the 2019 MBP 16" i7
4.5 fps on the Dell Ryzen7

The Dell takes 5 hours, the MBA takes 10 hours to finish the job.
But that's just one type of task. It doesn't apply to everything you do. My main task is mostly single threaded or very short bursts of multi-threaded work. I don't really need more than 4 performance cores for the majority of my day to day use. And Handbrake doesn't need a lot of RAM anyway.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: mi7chy
The 14" MacBook Pro is too large and bulky. It weighs almost 1 pound more than the M2 MacBook Air. It gets much worse battery life. It has a fan. I use my M1 MacBook Air to develop software (reactjs right now) and the M1 has plenty of power. The lack of a fan only throttles a bit after several minutes of high intensity CPU use. For my purposes the M2 MBA is much better since I don't really encounter high intensity CPU very often. When I do, it slows down by 15%, big deal. The only issue is that if I need a lot of containers, then 16 GB can be a bit small. I haven't run into any problems yet but another 8 GB will make me not have to think about it.

I have the 16 inch MBP (the last Intel one) and although its great on the desk, it is a pain to lug. I too splurged for this one for something smaller and more portable for development.

I used to have a MacBook Air back in 2010 and I loved it.
 
The 14" MacBook Pro is too large and bulky. It weighs almost 1 pound more than the M2 MacBook Air. It gets much worse battery life. It has a fan. I use my M1 MacBook Air to develop software (reactjs right now) and the M1 has plenty of power. The lack of a fan only throttles a bit after several minutes of high intensity CPU use. For my purposes the M2 MBA is much better since I don't really encounter high intensity CPU very often. When I do, it slows down by 15%, big deal. The only issue is that if I need a lot of containers, then 16 GB can be a bit small. I haven't run into any problems yet but another 8 GB will make me not have to think about it.
"much worse battery life"? According to Apple, comparing the two models, there is 1 hour more watching movies on the MBA M2 vs MBP 14 M1 Pro. 18 hrs vs 17 hours.

If you rarely do anything that is CPU intensive, then the fan argument is not valid. I don't ever even hear the fan come on. But if you do something intensive, I doubt you'd hear the fan anyways, but you're not throttling.

To each their own, but for basically the same price when the MBP 14 is on sale, I'd take a 16GB/512GB 14" MBP M1 Pro over a 24GB/512GB MBA M2 any day.
 
MBA with 24GB of RAM doesn't make sense, it's a high amount of RAM with not very high processing power (only 4 performance cores with no active cooling).

If you have high RAM needs you also have high CPU needs, so go to the MBP 14" 32GB, you also get a better screen (120 Hz), more ports, much better speakers. Or be patient and wait for the 15" MBA or the MBP M2 14".
As a software engineer I can assure you that you are 100% wrong.

Making use of large amounts of RAM often does not correlate with high utilization of CPU core(s).

Your needs and use patterns are your own and no one else’s.

I’m going with an Air over the Pro because for MY use pattern, it makes way more sense than the Pro. And even if I didn’t care about the extra heft of the Pro (which I do), it’s not offered in 24GB. The 32GB would put it 600+$ over my Air configuration when you include AppleCare.

So much useless dogma and irrelevant opinions being thrown around on here.

The only issue is that if I need a lot of containers, then 16 GB can be a bit small

^^ this one knows what’s up!
 
Last edited:
"much worse battery life"? According to Apple, comparing the two models, there is 1 hour more watching movies on the MBA M2 vs MBP 14 M1 Pro. 18 hrs vs 17 hours.

If you rarely do anything that is CPU intensive, then the fan argument is not valid. I don't ever even hear the fan come on. But if you do something intensive, I doubt you'd hear the fan anyways, but you're not throttling.

To each their own, but for basically the same price when the MBP 14 is on sale, I'd take a 16GB/512GB 14" MBP M1 Pro over a 24GB/512GB MBA M2 any day.
I don't watch movies on my MacBook. I use it for work. The more relevant battery number is wireless web though that isn't particularly accurate either. But for the sake of argument, wireless web is 11 hours for the M1 Pro MacBook Pro and 15 hours for the M2 MacBook Air. A significant difference. I don't own a MacBook Pro but I can tell you I get through an 8 hour day with more than 50% battery remaining with my M1 MacBook Air. I very much doubt that I could say the same for the M1 Pro MBP.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NotApplicable
Would it be a better value to get a Refurbished M1 Air 16Gb 256 at $921 direct from Apple with a 10% military discount versus a base M2 8G/256 for $1079? Looking to keep the machine at least 3-4 years.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.