Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Probably what will happen.
I don't think so... How many folks that were waiting for the Airpower to come, will buy other chargers this weekend? Lots...

This announcement would be a funny April Fools prank by Apple, but a costly one.
 
FYI for those still looking for a good wireless charging pad for all 3 devices at the same time -
Google Express has a great deal on the Nomad Base Station Apple Watch Edition. Usually $140, but only $119, plus if it is your first Google Express purchase you get an addition $20 off, making it just over $100 after tax.

Not to mention it is backordered everywhere (even Nomad won't ship it until April 30), but Google Express (shipped via Best Buy) will get it to you by April 2. You can also order via Best Buy but you won't get that extra $20 off. Everywhere else is backordered (and often still at that $140 MSRP).

Not linking because I don't want to appear to be advertising. Just Google "Nomad - Wireless Charging Pad for iPhone and Apple Watch"

$119 directly from Bestbuy.com
 
Somebody enlighten me... what was the big deal about an Apple wireless charger? Like, what was somebody waiting for this instead of just using something else? It's not like something that actually makes a physical connection with your device to charge it—what was the expectation that Apple was going to do something different or special?

What would have been distinguished the AirPower was the ability to randomly place the devices anywhere on the mat, and still have them charge properly.

Wireless chargers are sensitive to proper alignment; the coils in the charger and the coil in the device have to be in close proximity (in every axis, including z) for the inductive effect to optimally occur. Move that device slightly off the sweet spot, and it will stop charging.

Some existing chargers try to overcome this with multiple coils, with a slightly overlapped single layer, to lessen this need. That makes the sweet spots larger, but still doesn't allow for random placement.

What Apple was purportedly attempting to do was use multiple layers of coils, and surprise (!), found that it couldn't overcome the laws of physics. The normal process of inductive charging generates heat, and any metal object within the range of the coil also will "react" with it, such as keys, coins, etc, but also including other coils. Unintentionally creating a "hot plate" on one's desk is undesirable, so the charger has to somewhat intelligently detect unintended foreign objects and be conservative in shutting itself down for safety. The Qi charging/control protocol handles this.

Apple may have tried to overcome this with optimized coil placement in multiple layers, and some sort of sophisticated switching, but couldn't make it work.

The MRF peanut gallery will have its typical fun, but this was an engineering problem that would have been difficult for anyone to solve, not just Apple.

Edit--to add some perspective, those who say that their "XZY Charger" can already do this -- no, it can't, and it's not the same.

A typical wireless charger now on the market has a single coil. Some have two, or three, but none have more than a handful, at most. AirPower was rumored to have 22, which compounds and illustrates the complexity of the problem.

And, even if Apple was able to get it into a working state, where it performed decently and didn't serve as a mug warmer as a side function, and stopped leaving burn marks on the surface it rested on…that doesn't mean it would have necessarily passed muster with the FCC. These devices also generate RF, and must comply to interference regulations.

Apple can be rightly faulted for announcing an unfiniished, untested product and failing to successfully bring it to market. It can't be faulted for trying and failing.
 
Last edited:
Apple is going to one day want us to place our family in a self-driving car. But charge 3 devices at once? Can’t do it.
 
I called this the second they announced it. Anyone who knows the QI standard could have told them, this would never work. It's ****.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iSilas
Indeed, I agree with a poster here.
Just drop the, it has to be done the difficult Apple way.
Make something much simpler, much cheaper, give it Apple branding, and of course just price it a little higher than a generic one.
At least there would be one Apple fans can buy.
Hell just get something already being made, get the maker to tweak it a bit and apple brand it. job done.

Feels like Apple is such a slow juggernaut they can't react at any speed and get anything simple done quickly anymore.

I believe Griffin has similar product coming out...
 
Sweet baby Jesus you cant be serious....

Maybe you could start a class action, seems to be trendy.

Is it illegal to announce a product you have no intention of selling in order to increase stock value? Is it illegal to encourage people to buy an existing product with claims that a revolutionary new product will be supported by it? Maybe those things are legal. It feels wrong, but what do I know.

Also, are class action lawsuits wrong or something? Companies should be held accountable for their behavior. Are pro-corporatocracy or something?
 
It wasn't a mess at all- complicated engineering projects like this start and fail all the time, inside every company. The ONE single Mistake AAPL made was announcing it prematurely. After that, it was all the press and consumers and blogs running rampant. And now we see why Apple does NOT normally announce projects before they're ready.

When was the last time Apple announced entirely new hardware that was available that day? Or even that week? It seems to me that Apple used to not announce projects before they were ready, but today they make a habit of it. Heck they can't even get their services ready before they announce them. Last week they announced 4 services, and only 1 of them was available that day.
 
Didn't you hear about the new Apple credit card? Titanium and without a signature or expiration date? Are you telling me it's not innovative enough for you?

Apple credit card is not really innovating! I mean it's just a card like other cards with some percentage cash back and has nothing to do with certain innovating technology. Let's not be bias on this but I'm expecting more from a trillion dollar tech company. The last Apple event was their worst event with all those celebrities and Apple TV+. We already have many TV platforms with subscription services, it seems Apple wants to step into any industry and play a monopoly game with them, which I believe is not healthy.
 
I guess they didn't want to have to replace a ton of batteries at a discount again due to the heat issues. Everyone knows that's why recently the new iPhone sales suddenly dropped. Wouldn't want that to happen again. </s>
 
I'm pissed they waited until AFTER the AirPods wireless charging were launched. I purchased the Wireless charging case with my AirPods specifically for the future AirPower functionality. I have almost no interest in buying some 3rd party wireless charger.

LOL this just made my day...hope you can't turn them back....BAD Apple.
 
I'm pissed they waited until AFTER the AirPods wireless charging were launched. I purchased the Wireless charging case with my AirPods specifically for the future AirPower functionality. I have almost no interest in buying some 3rd party wireless charger.

They also released photos of the charging mat working with devices they sell.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.