The 13" MacBook Pro would be the logical replacement since it's only a tad more money and also faster...
(it's only a few hundred more for the MBP so anyone who wants the features the MB offered that the MBA doesn't have just spends a little more for an upgrade)...
'Only a tad more money' is still more money, though. Not everyone is in the position of adding a 'few hundred more' to the cost of their machine (and then adding on the cost of upgrades - when I bought mine after the late 2009 refresh the processors were virtually identical, but the MacBook came with a 250 GB HDD (compared to 125 GB in the MBP, if dame memory has not entirely quit her post). I got that upgraded to 500 GB and got another 2 GB of RAM for pretty much what the MacBook Pro would have cost). That's the main reason I went with a MacBook rather than a MacBook Pro (although, to be fair, it's the 13" MBP I'm intending to upgrade to). And I have to say I've never been disappointed with it...
Those white Macbooks were one of the worst laptop designs that Apple has come out with...They were like the eMac of the Apple laptop line...
It makes sense if you look at the product, It looks/feels cheap. Somehow it does not fit to apple...
Really? I've had nothing but compliments about the way it looks. The rounded edges certainly make it easier to pick up from a table. And it matches my white iPhone nicely.
Mind you, I've still got an eMac in the spare room...
Maybe it makes as much sense to think of the MacBook as an entry level Macintosh computer, rather than notebook?
Last edited: