Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple's retail chief Deirdre O'Brien apparently told employees today that remote work plans will be extended through at least April 5, but after that date, brick and mortar stores will be reopening on a staggered basis.

Where is the source for this story?

Never gonna happen. America is right at the start of this problem and one certain individual does not seem to understand the magnitude of what is happening. It's literally going to be months away before even any semblance of normality returns. U.S hasn't even begun to see the worst of it yet.

But it's coming.

So we should just ignore all the data worldwide and in the US that we have about transmission rates, morbidity and fatality and panic? Based on?
 
This is the right call, the virus spread has peaked in places like the Bay Area where social distancing has been going on for 3-4 weeks. In a week or two the numbers will look much better and stores can re-open on a case-by-case basis. So stores in the Bay Area might open, stores in NY might be closed for a few more weeks.

Do you have a credible source to support your assertion the virus has peaked in the Bay Area?
 
I am infected with this virus,and no, it is not nearly as bad as you are making it to be.

The only symptoms I had was a mild fever for about 12 hours, some body ache for a few days and a tiny cough.

Again, it did not and is not killing me.

As seen, this is what most people will experience and MOST people will not die form this.

So I ask again, stop blowing thisout or proportion as it the likes of you driving the media to blow this up and causes others to blow itup way out of proportion.
That’s great you’re doing so well. But how bad it will be in the US depends in large part on how many contract the virus.

If 100 million get the virus, anywhere from 500,000 to a couple million could die (0.5% to 2.0%) depending on complicating factors.
 
It is that simple, and it’s not a gotcha. It only takes one counter example to disprove a universal statement. You seem very focused in this thread on not assuming things that can’t be very specifically proven, but in this case you seem intent on defending a point that can be easily disproven.

It is not only dangerous to old people. I can prove that statement: Li died at 33. It doesn’t take a 5 page proof. I think you probably understand that and the point you’re trying to make is actually different.

Over generalizing is problematic...
May someone else did, but I didn’t say it only impacted old people. I also said people with compromised immunity due to underlying conditions which you can’t prove Li didn’t have because you lack his medical history. I also mentioned smoking. Checkmate, bro.

Your axe to grind is with someone else.
 
The problem is YOU don't know if you are sick or not. You can spread it and not even know you are doing so. So basically you are killing someone's grandma or putting some child in the ICU or someone's parent or someones teen just because you can't stay put. Selfish is what people are these days. You also don't know how your body will react to something completely foreign that it has never seen before. Odds are you will be ok, but the odds aren't that great that you won't.

Regarding CA. They have (currently) added 361 cases today, by the end of yesterday they added 381. NY today has 4790 cases and added 53 deaths just from this to their total. Of those 53 deaths, how many of them could have been prevented by people just listening to what they are supposed to do? How many of those 53 deaths or hospitalizations will cost someone else their life due to heart attack, stroke, car accident, or even the flu because there isn't room to treat them in time?

Stop being a selfish prick, unfortunately we all have to live on this planet together, even the *******s.

The only way they should reopen cities and businesses is to test the entire population for antibodies. If you have the antibodies then you are cleared to return to normal life. If you don't then you stay put. But we all know they won't do that because the dollar is more important than lives. The ass in the white house doesn't care about lives, he wants his hotels reopened and the market to reverse itself so that the stock he owns will be worth something when he gets voted out of office.


Wow, settle down cowboy. A few facts to help you calm down. Grab some tea as you read. Take things seriously, but no need to be hysterical.

Expect the number of cases, etc., to grow sharply for a few days.We are still processing the back log of tests, but should be caught up by Wednesday. But even in that data, please take note that out of about 60K cases, only about 2.4% have serious/critical symptoms, the rest are MILD or NO symptoms.

Relax in knowing that not a single person under 15 has died ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD (contrast to the seasonal flu which has killed 150 kids just in America this season).

Relax further in knowing that the fatality rate is plummeting and we are down to about 1.3%, which means there is an overall 99% chance of NOT dying from it. Experts believe the rate will settle closer to that of the seasonal flu because we have only tested people who have presented with symptoms. Since almost 98% of the people who get it have no or mild symptoms and never get tested, the denominator will grow exponentially (the only thing that appears to be exponential in all of thus, thank the Good Lord)

Calm yourself that even in messed up places like Italy, where they have recently admitted they are over counting deaths, the average age of those dying is 85 and most all have had a serious underlying health condition.

Finally, stop listening to the fake news that there is some overload of ANY hospital, much less most. No one hasn't been treated for an emergency because of COVID19. No one! As of today, 40 of the 50 states have less than ten deaths, and most entire states only have A FEW corona patients in the hospital! In New York, there is a fear that the shear numbers will overload their systems, but that is why they are ramping up and adding many more hospital beds, stocking ventilators, etc., in case that situation develops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OdT22 and Plutonius
#dieforthedow FTW

It has little to do with the stock market.

99% of the businesses are considered small businesses.

While they are closed, they can't pay employees or their own bills (rent, etc).

Once the closings hit a tipping point, the business failures will cascade until we are quickly into a depression (not recession).

Keeping businesses closed is not a long term option.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: OdT22
No not at a greater rate. A higher total number, not a greater rate. Covid-19 kills at a higher rate. And it’s more contagious than the flu (by far). And there’s no herd immunity. And there’s no vaccine to blunt the symptoms in individual cases. And there’s no effective antiviral to give to seriously ill patients.

All of which means that the downside risk of covid-19 is orders of magnitude greater than the downside risk of the seasonal flu.


Fair to say the downside risk is greater, but the data thus far is very encouraging that things like the death rate will end up similar to seasonal flu, transmission rate is also lower than expected. Most importantly, there is huge upside that COVID19 may have over the seasonal flu and that is the early evidence that Hydroxychloroquine and Z-Pack antibiotic will knock it out, which we have nothing similar for seasonal flu. If this is true, and we will know if about a week (New York begins massive deployment of this combo tomorrow thanks to Feds shipping hundreds of thousands of doses), then COVID19 will end in a whimper. Say your prayers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: OdT22
I didn’t just make those numbers or % up. There are several scientist actually saying the same. Every day it seems like the media is finally switching to that tune. This was from nearly a month ago.


NY prepping for 80% of their state. That’s going to be the entire US

You’re missing the the whole point of social distancing and stay at home strategies: to spread the number of patients that end up in ICU over 4 to 6 or 12 months instead of a month or two.

If those needing ventilators outstrip the supply, that’s when you have to decide who lives and who dies, like Italy. If you spread those same number of critically ill patients over many months and keep within the capacity of our healthcare system to care for them, we won’t have as many unnecessary and avoidable deaths.

Under both scenarios, the same number of people may ultimately be infected, but the number who will die could be drastically different.
 
My “rate” referred to total deaths. A rate can be any measure or quantity...not necessarily only a percentage.

But the only relevance that flu data could possibly have is if we're talking percentages. Total infections/deaths doesn't mean anything with a pandemic that's just getting going. Nobody anywhere is arguing that covid-19 HAS killed more people than the flu, we're arguing that it can and will unless it's stopped.

Flu vaccine and treatments aren’t very good if it kills 80,000 people in the richest nation in the world...it’s also evidently rather contagious. Is 1 BILLION cases contagious enough?

I'm not sure what point you think you're making here. The flu vaccine is not perfect but it's pretty good most years. Lost of people choose not to get it, and that obviously has to be factored into the data. But enough people do get it that it creates enough herd immunity to significantly slow the progress of the disease AND provides a degree of protection (reduced symptoms) to people who get the flu in spite of the vaccine.

If we had a covid-19 vaccine as good as our flu vaccine, countries wouldn't be shut down.

And yes, flu is quite contagious. And yet still not as contagious as covid-19. Which tells me that covid-19 is some seriously bad stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mw0103
Most importantly, there is huge upside that COVID19 may have over the seasonal flu and that is the early evidence that Hydroxychloroquine and Z-Pack antibiotic will knock it out, which we have nothing similar for seasonal flu. If this is true, [...]
Hope so. Would certainly be great. No good scientific reason to believe it yet.

edit: i should add: there are a lot of antivirals in various stages of testing right now. We all hope like hell one or more prove effective. But it’s still very early days on that. This isn’t going away in a week or a month because of an antiviral treatment.
 
Last edited:
When the the virus is everywhere, I think it makes more sense to quarantine the vulnerable.

We are all vulnerable. Healthy 30 year olds have died. An otherwise-healthy baby is on a respirator. 35% of those hospitalized for it in America are under 50. Who are these “vulnerable“ people you refer to?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
May someone else did, but I didn’t say it only impacted old people. I also said people with compromised immunity due to underlying conditions which you can’t prove Li didn’t have because you lack his medical history. I also mentioned smoking. Checkmate, bro.

Your axe to grind is with someone else.
Yes it is, but for some reason you stepped in and started arguing with me. Follow the thread back and you'll see the comment I responded to.

And not having his medical history doesn't prove this only seriously affects the old, immune compromised and smokers-- that is actually quite difficult to prove and most likely wrong-- but we can save that argument for a different time, bro. 😉
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Baymowe335
But the only relevance that flu data could possibly have is if we're talking percentages. Total infections/deaths doesn't mean anything with a pandemic that's just getting going. Nobody anywhere is arguing that covid-19 HAS killed more people than the flu, we're arguing that it can and will unless it's stopped.



I'm not sure what point you think you're making here. The flu vaccine is not perfect but it's pretty good most years. Lost of people choose not to get it, and that obviously has to be factored into the data. But enough people do get it that it creates enough herd immunity to significantly slow the progress of the disease AND provides a degree of protection (reduced symptoms) to people who get the flu in spite of the vaccine.

If we had a covid-19 vaccine as good as our flu vaccine, countries wouldn't be shut down.

And yes, flu is quite contagious. And yet still not as contagious as covid-19. Which tells me that covid-19 is some seriously bad stuff.
No, percentages only matter for the flu because of the large dataset and projecting with Covid19 percentages is completely silly and will not play out. I’ll take the under on any extrapolation made With early mortality rates of Covid19.

To be far, my flu stat is for a single year, so it’s not cumulative or something. It’s irresponsible to project early data to large numbers just as it is to completely ignore this as nothing, which I’m not doing.

Our flu vaccine and/or execution in using it sucks based on the data. 1B cases and 200,000 to 600,000 deaths worldwide per year? I mean, you can’t just ignore this and say, “we have a vaccine.”
[automerge]1585111939[/automerge]
Yes it is, but for some reason you stepped in and started arguing with me. Follow the thread back and you'll see the comment I responded to.

And not having his medical history doesn't prove only seriously affects the old, immune compromised and smokers-- that is actually quite difficult to prove and most likely wrong-- but we can save that argument for a different time, bro. 😉
We don’t have enough facts about his case to make the “this guy died young” example solid enough. All we know is his age.

You have to manage this like insurance. Just because you’re a well-behaved 16 year old boy with straight As and perfect morals doesn’t mean we aren’t slapping you with high risk rate car insurance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OdT22
Yet the number of confirmed (tested) cases of Cov... continues to increase by several hundred victims in CA each day with no end in sight. That's just tested and confirmed cases. The number of people that are sick (or carriers) that fly under the official stat radar can only be imagined. Nobody knows. It's not like in April it will suddenly be fine to be around people in close quarters- it'll be more risky than it is now.
But businesses can't stay closed forever- Shop at your own risk

No, it won't be more risky then than now. Yes, the number of cases continues to increase today - this is expected, and a normal part of the infection rate curve. It's just simple statistics. The active cases curve plays out roughly the same in every country...about 30 days from the rapid growth in cases to the peak. China peaked in mid February, U.S. will likely peak in April. Apple is probably right on target with predicting early-mid April for rapid decline in the number of U.S. cases.

Screen Shot 2020-03-24 at 10.00.36 PM.png
 
Because corona is nothing serious. Only to old people.
While this seems to be mostly true (and to the very young), I personally know of two people who have had it and self-quarantined at home. After two weeks they were mostly back to normal, although both admit it wasn't a stroll in the park. A doctor friend of mine was quoting statistics echoing the above.

Me, I don't want to be that exception case.

Let's not forget that covid-19 leaves permanent damage to the lungs ... even for the youthful after this is all said and done there is no data to disprove they're likely to avoid having weaker immune systems to the next Flu or other virus' in the future.
[automerge]1585113210[/automerge]
No, it won't be more risky then than now. Yes, the number of cases continues to increase today - this is expected, and a normal part of the infection rate curve. It's just simple statistics. The active cases curve plays out roughly the same in every country...about 30 days from the rapid growth in cases to the peak. China peaked in mid February, U.S. will likely peak in April. Apple is probably right on target with predicting early-mid April for rapid decline in the number of U.S. cases.

View attachment 901128


A very good interactive map is here from John Hopkins University of Medicine (Coronavirus Resource Centre)

We need to be careful when just looking at the daily increase vs confirmed ... the increase has dropped in China and the confirmed cases seems to have tapered off, yet this is China as a whole country ... what about looking at the province of Wuhann (I may have misspelled that, sorry if so).
 
Last edited:
Several hundred per day?

There are only 2,000 cases in all of California and it took a while to get to that point.

Yes, there are more infections every day, but no need to exaggerate.

New York City has 13,000 cases which is unfortunate.

This is the exact attitude why this disease is spreading so so fast
These are ONLY the KNOW cases it's estimated that the actual number is much higher.
New York has 5000 more known cases just from yesterday.
People who are completely healthy can pass this lease on to other and make them sick.
If nothing is done millions of people will die - this is not an an exaggeration it is a simple fact
one person can spend it to a thousand people.
My grandfather lived through the 1918-19 Spanish Flu - millions died and today we have interContinental traffic.

Earth has been invaded by invisible aliens and we have no weapons to defend against them.
Yes we to take this seriously.
An over reaction to situation is better than no reaction at all.

these curves are only the beginning...
[automerge]1585114709[/automerge]
Why? If im not sick why should i wear a mask for?
Because healthy people can spread the virus - you do NOT need to sick to infect others.
 
except for the fact the 40% of the Covid-19 deaths are people UNDER the age of 50.
Percentages don't matter to ANYONE. when you have loved one that is sick or dies from it.
Can you site proof of that claim as there is proof that the percentage of ANY age group dying is nowhere near 40% as seen in the link below.

 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.