They have to have a matte (anti-glare) option..
They can't have their whole display lineup as glossy only. Bad enough that the iMac's are glossy only.
A matte 21.5" ACD and a matte 27" ACD would be awesome. Silver enclosure please.
+1
They have to have a matte (anti-glare) option..
They can't have their whole display lineup as glossy only. Bad enough that the iMac's are glossy only.
A matte 21.5" ACD and a matte 27" ACD would be awesome. Silver enclosure please.
An iPAD is an 9 inch ipod touch, not a computer. Can I do architectural drafting and renderings on a 9-inch ipod touch? Some of us buy Apple products for work..not just because they are shiny and "magical"
I dont get the fascination with Apples ACD monitors. Yea they're nice looking, but Samsung has some very vice looking screens that a far better quality and are also LED.
![]()
![]()
http://www.samsung.com/nz/consumer/...XY/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=features
Now if Apple blows our mind at a nice pricing point including 'apple tax' then ill happily take the things I said back.
I dont get the fascination with Apples ACD monitors.
I dont get the fascination with Apples ACD monitors. Yea they're nice looking, but Samsung has some very vice looking screens that a far better quality and are also LED.
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.samsung.com/nz/consumer/...XY/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=features
Now if Apple blows our mind at a nice pricing point including 'apple tax' then ill happily take the things I said back. But I would rather see that the graphics cards in the Mac Pros have more than one mini DPs on them. So you could use 2 LED ACDs at once without an extra GPU.
Seriously, any "professional" that buys a mac display needs to seriously learn a thing or two about colour and save up for a good Eizo.
No offense, but are you seriously saying that a TN panel is on bar to a IPS panel in quality? I had a Samsung TN panel before, besides my Dell IPS 2007wfp, and the Dell blows the TN panel out of the water. Samsung was not LED, so a bit improvement in terms of contrast there could be...
A.B.
An iPAD is an 9 inch ipod touch, not a computer. Can I do architectural drafting and renderings on a 9-inch ipod touch? Some of us buy Apple products for work..not just because they are shiny and "magical"
I don't know the entire history of the PowerMac & MacPro but in the buyers guide it is statistically way over due. So the increments of upgrades must be better than one every 15 months (June 2010) I remember the iMac changing from 233 to 266 etc in the shake of a lamb's tail. It felt like improvements could come any time. Now it's an age.
Sorry, but the backlighting/panels are a major concern for those who are professionals (photographers and graphic designers). Read up on panels, such as IPS ("In Plain Sight, meaning the image is NOT distorted no matter what angle), TFT and TN (used mostly in the displays you sighted, TFT are cheaper LCD monitors that typically distort image quality from various angles and do not have color matching necessary for Pro-users), S-IPS, H-IPS, S-PVA, MVA, etc. You will learn that there are important differences in display panel types that justify the different costs. EIZO monitors are one of a few industry standard display manufacturers, and Apple has tended to be highly regarded for Mac professionals as their monitors don't typically need hardware configuring for color matching/values (which is why there is considerably more Mac/Apple professionals). The screen to print is virtually identical depending on the software and printer utilized. I believe Apple has utilized IPS panels for their display line for years (aside from the discontiuned 20" CCFL ACD - and CCFL refers to cold-cathode florescent lamp traditionally utilized for LCD's).
Read up on the differences, you may grow to appreciate the subtle variations that are important to graphic designers and photographers who constitute much of the "Pro"-sumer market. As such, there are other manufacturers that produce top-notch displays that I would recommend over Apple displays, such as EIZO, but they are also priced significantly more.
EDIT: Someone posted a comment that suggested LED LCD's use more energy than CCFL LCD's, not true. In fact, LED LCD panel's typically use 40-50% less energy than CCFL panels. The reason they haven't been adopted mainstream yet is that they COST more to produce, not to power. Major significance.
I got a 30" Dell Ultrasharp LCD that is fantastic - and it cost less than $1,000. And yes, it IS just as color accurate as Apple's. No it doesn't match my MacPro, but I just don't care. The stand is better, it has a card reader built-in, more convenient port placement, etc... Apple's monitor's are the single most overpriced thing the company has ever produced.
What are the chances that the 27" LED Cinema Display will have the dreaded YELLOW TINT?![]()
Even today the Mac Pro is a good value.
I'll make this counter point in every thread you post this statement, because it's only half true.
The quad core MacPro is not a good value. When compared to other company prices on Xeon based workstations, it can be almost $1000 cheaper to avoid the mac. If you switch to a core i7 instead of a Xeon, the gap widens to become ridiculous.
Only the dual quad core Mac Pro is competitive on price. Even then, a $3300 machine that comes with six 1 GB sticks of ram is a little insulting.
Oh yes. Absolutely. Why should Apple listen to its customers? Especially its high-end high-ticket enterprise line customers?
The new Apple commercial:
"Hi. I'm a Mac. Shut the ef up and take me as Lord Stevo-o made me or leave me."
![]()
ROFLMAO
Sorry, but Apple doesn't care about computers anymore.
Specifications != real-world. The iPhone/iPad are locked down by software restrictions to an extent that they can only be considered appliances. If you want to compare, let's say, a Mac IIci versus a Jailbroken iPhone, then yes I'd agree that that liberated iPhone can do as much computing as that golden years Mac.
Too Late Apple, I've waited for what seems years for you to upgrade your monitors. I've bought instead two Dell U2410's for £400 each. Nice matt screen, usual card readers, makes me a very happy bunny.
![]()
Yes it is, if you have 3 passengers and some luggage to transport in relative comfort. In the same way if you need additional connectors to utilise other existing equipment, it's an issue.
No need for a glossy Apple monitor... Dell monitors are pretty good. Pulled the trigger on a Dell U2711 (27" - 2560x1440 - matte). Excellent screen.
Personally I can see why all these people are very worries about using this new monitor for professional work, but as has been stated previously (ad nauseum) there are other options; such as the Dell, Samsung, Ezio, whatever monitors.
A friend of mine has a Dell monitor as well and is cheaper and way beyond better than Apples monitors.
Seriously, any "professional" that buys a mac display needs to seriously learn a thing or two about colour and save up for a good Eizo.
apple needs to drop the prices of these dang blasted monitors.. Why would i spend almost a 1000 on a monitor when i can get a lcd tv for cheaper or around the same price.. stop it apple !!!!!