Silverrr said:u can just see Steve Jobs walks onto the stage and say, "well, you know how we said June 2006 for Intel chips? Well, guess what, they are here now..."
No, the LGJ said "by WWDC '06", not "at WWDC '06".922 said:I would agree with you. But Developers wouldn't. Apple told them 2006.
Apple is telling developers to program for the Dothan chips that are now available. The developers aren't being told to wait for Yonah around the end of this year, let alone any chips due the middle of 2006.. I take that as a signal that we'll see MacIntels pretty soon....
For the low-end consumer (MiniMac/iBook) Apple could release MacIntels as soon as the O/S is stable and the iLife suite is native. That's all a majority of the entry consumers will need, and Rosetta will be good enough for the odd program that's not a Fat Binary.
Having MacIntels on the shelves would be a great "kick in the pants" to get the developers to finish their fat binary ports - because there would be a market for the dual-platform programs.
In the "chicken-egg" problem of architectural transitions, you always need the hardware/OS to lead the 3rd party developers. Did Apple hold off the 68k -> PPC transition until all the developers were on board? Did Apple hold off on OSX until all the 3rd parties were ready? No, and no.
There's also the fact that a cheap MiniMacIntel would give small developers a much cheaper machine to test their fat binaries on....