Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Nah, that’s too easy. These guys prefer to whine and moan and made up scenarios and have victim mindset, as if the eSIM only iPhone 14 is the only phone that exists in the world.
Right, because getting a Canadian iPhone 14 (without mmWave bands) is as easy as going to your local Apple store lol.
 
Do the research first. Type international esim on Google and you have plenty of options in every part of the world. Stop looking for excuses and educate yourself
You do your research! eSIM is not F&**ing available on pre paid or pay as you go outside the US. Simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aforty
Nah, that’s too easy. These guys prefer to whine and moan and made up scenarios and have victim mindset, as if the eSIM only iPhone 14 is the only phone that exists in the world.

It's not but if you want the benefit of faster 5G UC/UW frequencies that are in the US, you're prevented from using physical SIMs when traveling abroad. This is a consumer unfriendly decision
 
If you're on Magenta Max you now get 5GB of high speed data a month. May not be useful for you if you're gone for months at a time, but for casual travelers it does make it less relevant. It's still way more convenient to pop in a local SIM though - for £10 I can get something like 15 or 20 gigs of high speed data in the UK for a week. More than I'll ever need.
Sure. It just doesn’t work for me which is why I posted what I did. I need a SIM card slot until the rest of the worlds telecoms catch up.
 
I'm on the exact same plan on AT&T but oddly enough, i asked 2 AT&T representatives (they even texted their manager and said the same thing) at my local store and they said that it was only for use in Mexico (they said that because they didn't know that it's really for all of Latin America; they think Latin America is just Mexico)
I was a store manager with AT&T until yesterday so I know the plan works in Central and SouthAmerica. This is why I tell everyone to avoid Authorized Retail stores, unfortunately there are a lot more of those than "corporate" stores.
 
In my opinion, I think Apple made the right choice as having SIM tray-less phone is part of the future. Eventually carriers are going to adapt to the having esim plans because Apple is such a big influence on technology (look at te removal of the floppy disk, removal of the CD rom and the removal of the headphone jack; eventually other companies followed suit)
 
I was a store manager with AT&T until yesterday so I know the plan works in Central and SouthAmerica. This is why I tell everyone to avoid Authorized Retail stores, unfortunately there are a lot more of those than "corporate" stores.
You know what, I went to the Authorized Retail store. What's the difference though between them and the regular stores?
 
I was a store manager with AT&T until yesterday so I know the plan works in Central and SouthAmerica. This is why I tell everyone to avoid Authorized Retail stores, unfortunately there are a lot more of those than "corporate" stores.
I even did my research on the type of plan that I had and I just wanted to confirm but they didn't know about it
 
Not for nothing, but as little as 12 years ago, not everyone supported GSM, or LTE. In fact, Verizon and Sprint refused to use or sell an iPhone because it didn't work with their own proprietary network, which was CDMA, while it worked for 99% of the world, who was on GSM.

Even they folded, and got the iPhone.

And that was a mixed back of supported and not supported, global standard and nonstandard. And coming up to now, with 4G, LTE, and now what we have, they all have adopted. Both Sprint and Verizon were battling with the GSM carriers saying that their network was better with the iPhone, yet even they folded into LTE, making the standard even better.

My point: all of the time they spent bagging the iPhone while they didn't have it made them feel salty in having to eat their words when they finally got it, as they couldn't reconcile their stance with having the iPhone versus them saying it was a crappy device. The same applies here; it's a mixed bag of supported and unsupported, but eventually, even the staunchest of resistant carriers folded because they saw the revenue they were missing.

BL.

As always you have no clue on what you are talking about.

It’s Apple that bend backward to accommodate CDMA on iPhone 4 so they can get Verizon. It’s not Verizon folded it was apple.

Apple was testing CDMA to get into Verizon network a full 2 years before iPhone 4 came out.

LTE has nothing to do with GSM or CDMA. Because it was one universal technology. Apple isn’t even the forerunner on adapting LTE. Same with 5G

Why do you need to continuously feel the need to write BS?

First LTE phone is HTC desire. First 5G phone actually started in China. Apple was actually late to both.

Please stop keeping on embarrassing yourself. You already have zero creditbility on prepaid vs postpaid esim.
 
Something must be wrong. Haven’t you seen all the posts from folks that travel to 100+ countries reporting they have had no problems with eSIM? You need to keep up with the times!

Because they assume they have post paid or global esim, that it works.

Show me how you can get prepaid esim in China and Japan.

The answer is you can’t.
 
Nah, that’s too easy. These guys prefer to whine and moan and made up scenarios and have victim mindset, as if the eSIM only iPhone 14 is the only phone that exists in the world.
No one said that.

But this is apple forum and we are discussing iPhone 14 for us right.

So what is your point then?
 
You do your research! eSIM is not F&**ing available on pre paid or pay as you go outside the US. Simple.
Incorrect generalization as there ARE providers providing eSIM for tourists/prepaid, although not commonplace. I myself have stated 2 exact examples form my own experience.

BUT, you do bring up a point the lack of information. This is what Apple SHOULD be doing, aka making a dashboard to detail the eSIM readiness of (at least) their carrier partners worldwide. Simply having a list like what Apple is doing now is not helpful. If Apple really wanted to help customers, they should simply disclose what eSIM services offered by their carrier partners, any related fees, and direct link to their eSIM services. Transparency will help customers look at which carriers are the douche ones, and make wiser decision. Then free market will do its thing. Right now, Apple is only patting themselves in the back.
 
Last edited:
Right, because getting a Canadian iPhone 14 (without mmWave bands) is as easy as going to your local Apple store lol.
Which one is more important to you? mmWave band or SIM tray? If both are important, get the iPhone 13. Done. Why so much stress over your own self imposed frustration?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WannaGoMac
It's not but if you want the benefit of faster 5G UC/UW frequencies that are in the US, you're prevented from using physical SIMs when traveling abroad. This is a consumer unfriendly decision
Simply get the iPhone 13. That has both SIM tray and mmWave.
I mean I don't get the people that are self-limiting their choice to one single phone (US iPhone 14) as if that's the only phone available in the whole world.
 
As always you have no clue on what you are talking about.

Apparently your history of iPhone releases escapes you, because your history of this is wrong.

It’s Apple that bend backward to accommodate CDMA on iPhone 4 so they can get Verizon. It’s not Verizon folded it was apple.

iPhone: ATT only.
iPhone 3G: ATT only.
iPhone 3GS: ATT only.
iPhone 4, until October 2011: ATT only.

Halfway through the iPhone 4 cycle, did Verizon get the iPhone, after spending nearly 3 years bashing the phone.

It wasn’t until the october 2011 - the same time that Verizon got the phone - that Sprint did as well. Both CDMA, for their networks only. The only reason they got that was because the contract for exclusivity with ATT expired around that time.

Apple was testing CDMA to get into Verizon network a full 2 years before iPhone 4 came out.

source for the bold.

LTE has nothing to do with GSM or CDMA. Because it was one universal technology. Apple isn’t even the forerunner on adapting LTE. Same with 5G

Exactly. So much for unsupported this or that, because they ALL fell into the global fold, just like unsupported this or that for eSIM will. Thank you for proving my point.

Why do you need to continuously feel the need to write BS?

First LTE phone is HTC desire. First 5G phone actually started in China. Apple was actually late to both.

I never said that they were the first. I said that they had all of the US carriers adopt the global standard, instead of having separate, proprietary networks that they try to pass off as the standard.

You know what they say when people assume and try to put words into people’s mouths…

Please stop keeping on embarrassing yourself.

Pot. Kettle. Black.

You already have zero creditbility on prepaid vs postpaid esim.

Worked for me in Australia. Too bad it doesn’t work for you. But oh well; have fun with the whinge.

BL.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: WannaGoMac
Just want to mention that all my posts in support of eSIM or those speaking in support of eSIM are sarcasm!

On personal note:

My sister's phone broke while she was visiting the US from India. It was a dual SIM phone. Because it was an international phone, getting parts to fix it was going to take almost a month. We bought a new phone similar to her old one, a Samsung A53, thinking it has dual SIM support. It had 2 SIM slots and was advertised as a dual SIM phone by Best Buy. As she was about to leave, she discovered that it wouldn't recognize the second SIM card. It turns out that US spec A53's are advertised as dual SIM but one must be eSIM (rest of world gets full dual SIM support). We were out of the 14 day return period. Back in India she found her carrier doesn't support eSIM and her workplace only issues physical SIMs. Thus her only options were to switch carriers (but the other one didn't have good service in her house), carry 2 phones one for home and one for work, or get rid of the A53 that we bought and replace with a new phone with true dual SIM support. She ended up doing the 3rd option.

What Apple has done is pure hubris on their part. Someone probably won political battle at work and got a raise for coming up with this idea. My guess is they will reverse this decision with the next phone.
 
Last edited:
Here's another issue with physical sims. I have a Reolink Go security camera that uses a SIM card to transmit video so you can access with a cell phone or computer (makes it useful for locations that don't have wifi). Mint Mobile is one of the carriers that works on the Go camera. Mint often offers a 3 month plan for $10 or $15 specials (instead of the usual $45) with a physical sim. However, you must insert the SIM in a phone to activate it first before moving it to the Go camera. So if I buy a new iphone 14 that is no longer possible. I have to carry around an old phone to activate those sims - just another pain in the butt thing I have to worry about if I upgrade phones. Thank goodness my iphone 13 is good for another couple of years.
 
You do your research! eSIM is not F&**ing available on pre paid or pay as you go outside the US. Simple.
It is in Thailand :)

But generally you are correct its very hard to get pay as you go esims

There are many solutions available to the various scenarios we can dream up, but mostly they cost more or many $$$'s over a simple physical sim option
 
Well then it’s time to finally support it. They are lazy that’s the problem. Apple will force them to move forward
They may move....but whether the direction is "forward" is certainly debatable....except of course for those who dismiss any viewpoint that disagrees with theirs as invalid and unworthy of discussion...except of course to mock others and yap yap yap about how their views are irrelevant.
 


Amid criticism from some customers regarding the removal of the SIM card tray on all iPhone 14 models sold in the United States, Apple today published a new support document outlining various "options and benefits" for using eSIMs while traveling abroad.

iphone-14-iphone-14-plus-in-hand.jpg

Apple says an eSIM is more secure than a physical SIM since it cannot be removed from an iPhone that is lost or stolen. Apple also says that eSIMs eliminate the need to obtain, carry, and swap physical SIM cards, or wait for them to arrive by mail.

The support document notes that the iPhone XS and newer can store eight or more eSIMs, while the iPhone 13 and newer can have two eSIMs active at the same time.

"This could, for example, include one eSIM for your home and another eSIM for the place you're visiting," the support document explains. "You can swap which of your stored eSIMs are active simply by changing your selections in Settings."

The support document includes information for customers looking to roam internationally with their existing carrier, purchase an eSIM from a local carrier while traveling abroad, or purchase a prepaid data eSIM from a worldwide service provider.

Apple says customers can activate an unlocked iPhone 14 model purchased in the United States with over 400 carriers that support eSIM on the iPhone in 100 markets around the world. Apple adds that many worldwide service providers also offer prepaid eSIM data plans for long-term use in countries around the world.

Some people have expressed concerns about eSIM availability while traveling abroad with eSIM-only iPhone 14 models from the United States.

In his iPhone 14 Pro camera review, travel photographer Austin Mann said he was "a bit concerned about the practicality of an eSIM-only approach for travelers with US iPhones who frequently visit the developing world," adding that he usually purchases a local SIM card in countries where he travels to so that it is easier and cheaper to communicate with people within the country. Mann said he would be thrilled to toss out his collection of physical SIM cards, but said he has been unable to figure out how to sign up for an eSIM line in East Africa, where he plans to travel to next summer.

The support document is unlikely to assuage disappointed customers, but it does serve as a helpful resource for using eSIM technology.

Article Link: Apple Promotes Benefits of Using iPhone 14 With eSIM While Traveling Abroad
I on a trip to the US right now, during taxi on the flight here I signed up for free trial with mint mobile and set my eSim. When I landed in LAX my phone worked and decided to Sign up for 3 months. eSim is great when it works but I would rather a physical sim just in case.
 
They may move....but whether the direction is "forward" is certainly debatable....except of course for those who dismiss any viewpoint that disagrees with theirs as invalid and unworthy of discussion...except of course to mock others and yap yap yap about how their views are irrelevant.
It's inevitable, and technology wise, there is already iSIM, where the SIM is integrated into the SoC.
Having said that, we will always have physical SIM in the near future as the lowest common denominator. It's just that the availability for eSIM is lagging. Somebody got to put their foot forward, and Apple is the company that is big enough to do it.

Samsung tried persuading the top carriers in my country to support eSIM for their foldable launch, but it went to deaf ears. Sometimes we need somebody like Apple to push things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Knavel and M.Rizk
Just want to mention that all my posts in support of eSIM or those speaking in support of eSIM are sarcasm!

On personal note:

My sister's phone broke while she was visiting the US from India. It was a dual SIM phone. Because it was an international phone, getting parts to fix it was going to take almost a month. We bought a new phone similar to her old one, a Samsung A53, thinking it has dual SIM support. It had 2 SIM slots and was advertised as a dual SIM phone by Best Buy. As she was about to leave, she discovered that it wouldn't recognize the second SIM card. It turns out that US spec A53's are advertised as dual SIM but one must be eSIM (rest of world gets full dual SIM support). We were out of the 14 day return period. Back in India she found her carrier doesn't support eSIM and her workplace only issues physical SIMs. Thus her only options were to switch carriers (but the other one didn't have good service in her house), carry 2 phones one for home and one for work, or get rid of the A53 that we bought and replace with a new phone with true dual SIM support. She ended up doing the 3rd option.

What Apple has done is pure hubris on their part. Someone probably won political battle at work and got a raise for coming up with this idea. My guess is they will reverse this decision with the next phone.
How does your mistake in buying a US Samsung phone is Apple's fault? I mean you can simply open up the SIM slot and see if it's dual SIM or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: M.Rizk
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.