Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’ve yet to find a store in Canada that doesn’t accept Apple Pay

So in other words they didn't remove Apple Pay from any sites because Apple Pay isn't supported anywhere besides Apple.com and 1 or 2 other stores. (As an Apple Watch owner, I want to see Apple Pay integrated into more areas [just not Nazi sites])
 
Pointing the finger somewhere else doesn’t change what BLM did nor does it make it acceptable.
I visited the Black Lives Matter website, and I don't understand what you find unacceptable.

Anyway, this article is about Apple pulling Apple Pay support from websites selling White Nationalist and Nazi apparel. So complaining about BLM is "pointing the finger somewhere else".
 
A payment system (i.e. our modern money) does NOT belong in the hands of an individual [company].

Think about the time when cash is gone. In those days a few people, literally, can decide who can pay/buy and who can't.
 
Ok that’s fine. Just do the same for other hate groups (Antifa, BLM.....).

Trump was not wrong when he said both sides were at fault.

It's insane but not surprising how many high profile business men politicians and celebrities are saying there's only One side. It's not that they don't have the facts or knowledge it's that they're playing the role of "resistance" at every turn

No, there isn't one side. This is a rather obvious observation to me: hate exists in multiple forms and flavors. Kkk neo nazi white supremacist westboro baptist church ISIS

But also blm and Antifa -- this group mainstream media pretends to be baffled to just be hearing about, the 'alt left', yet also a group which they've refused to cover at all up until now where they can't hide frm it being brought up during debate/discussion. Forced by hand kinda thing. But even then! Defending them!
 
Ok i’ve about had enough. I want a damn good explanation as to why both sides cannot be held responsible for this.

If it’s not a good and intellectual answer, don’t even bother. All were doing is attacking each other on here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thadoggfather
While I think white supremacist groups are deplorable and disgusting, I am concerned when people start denying access to things based on what that individual believes to be morally repugnant.

While I'm not trying to make a direct comparison between the two, there are plenty of people here who say "Hooray that Tim Cook won't let these people use Apple pay", who also said "How dare Oregonian bakers not make a cake for a gay wedding."

I'm not sure I want to live in a country where people use economics to force their morality on others (even when I agree with their morality), and be honest, that's what Apple is doing here. And I've seen people twist any view that they don't believe in into "hate speech."

It's a gray area when access should be denied, but selling a cake is not the same thing as selling Nazi apparel and accessories. One is supporting gays and the other is supporting genocide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capeto
Side note: The photo from that video’s thumbnail of the “Antifa” guy clubbing the police officer has been debunked and linked back to a Getty Images photo from the 2009 protests in Greece.

antifa-or-greece.jpg


http://www.snopes.com/antifa-member-photographed-beating-police-officer/

You know there is no way to condemn the so called "alt-left" when the alt-right uses images from their counterparts in Greece, hoping that people will not spot it
 
Ok i’ve about had enough. I want a damn good explanation as to why both sides cannot be held responsible for this.

If it’s not a good and intellectual answer, don’t even bother. All were doing is attacking each other on here.

Ok that’s fine. Just do the same for other hate groups (Antifa, BLM.....).

Trump was not wrong when he said both sides were at fault.

All violence should be condemned no matter the group. However, saying "both sides were at fault" is a diversion from the bigger picture, which is Nazism should NOT be tolerated in any form.

What Trump has essentially done is portray Nazis as equals to Antifa, BLM, leftists, etc. By doing so, he has emboldened white nationalists to continue practicing their beliefs. The same beliefs that led to the genocide of millions of Jews.

It's insane but not surprising how many high profile business men politicians and celebrities are saying there's only One side. It's not that they don't have the facts or knowledge it's that they're playing the role of "resistance" at every turn

No, there isn't one side. This is a rather obvious observation to me: hate exists in multiple forms and flavors. Kkk neo nazi white supremacist westboro baptist church ISIS

But also blm and Antifa -- this group mainstream media pretends to be baffled to just be hearing about, the 'alt left', yet also a group which they've refused to cover at all up until now where they can't hide frm it being brought up during debate/discussion. Forced by hand kinda thing. But even then! Defending them!

Yes, I agree all violence should be condemned, but you're oversimplifying it. Antifa and BLM is what? a few years old? It doesn't have the history of violence that the Nazis do. We fought in a World War against the Nazis and thousands of Americans died. The Nazis also murdered millions of Jews. A white nationalist murdered an American with his car. Antifa and BLM doesn't excuse Nazism.
 
Last edited:
All violence should be condemned no matter the group. However, saying "both sides were at fault" is a diversion from the bigger picture, which is Nazism should NOT be tolerated in any form. Or should we just wait it out and see what happens? What could go wrong?

What Trump has essentially done is portray Nazis as equals to Antifa, BLM, leftists, etc. By doing so, he has emboldened white nationalists to continue practicing their beliefs. The same beliefs that led to the genocide of millions of Jews.



Yes, I agree all violence should be condemned, but you're oversimplifying it. Antifa and BLM is what? a few years old? It doesn't have the history of violence that the Nazis do. We fought in a World War against the Nazis and thousands of Americans died. The Nazis also murdered millions of Jews. A white nationalist murdered an American with his car. Antifa and BLM doesn't excuse Nazism.
The idea is to not give them the opportunity to have the history that the Nazis did, preventative measures essentially. We have to be careful and stop these groups early on before they do any more damage.

Just so everyone knows, and to show how you failed to comprehend my post, I was not excusing Nazism. I was asking why we cannot hold both sides responsible as they should be. I’m simplifying it for a good reason too, all violence should be condemned so we can move on and fix this division problem that we have. Complexity is what got us in the mess to begin with.
 
Last edited:
The idea is to not give them the opportunity to have the history that the Nazis did, preventative measures essentially. We have to be careful and stop these groups early on before they do any more damage.

Groups should be able to protest, but not when it incites violence or encroaches on our rights and freedoms.
 
Groups should be able to protest, but not when it incites violence or encroaches on our rights and freedoms.
These groups have exceeded that threshold many of times, and police were instructed to not interfere. How screwed up is that? Oh just let them burn down cities, they’re exercising their rights!!
 
Just so everyone knows, and to show how you failed to comprehend my post, I was not excusing Nazism. I was asking why we cannot hold both sides responsible as they should be. I’m simplifying it for a good reason too, all violence should be condemned so we can move on and fix this division problem that we have. Complexity is what got us in the mess to begin with.

And you failed to comprehend my post. We can and should hold anyone committing violence responsible. The point is, Nazism was allowed to proliferate Charlottesville and a terrorist act was committed. Condemnation of Nazism should be swift because its a VERY dangerous ideology.

These groups have exceeded that threshold many of times, and police were instructed to not interfere. How screwed up is that? Oh just let them burn down cities, they’re exercising their rights!!

Burning down buildings is illegal and isn't a right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Capeto and LordVic
You can critisize Tim for some business decisions, but surely he owns a moral compass. And more importantly, he expresses that.
 
And you failed to comprehend my post. We can and should hold anyone committing violence responsible. The point is, Nazism was allowed to proliferate Charlottesville and a terrorist act was committed. Condemnation of Nazism should be swift because its a VERY dangerous ideology.



Burning down buildings is illegal and isn't a right.
The city should have denied the permit to the Nazi protest. But they can’t, that’s a violation of their rights. Trump and staffers condemned it. Case closed.

And I was stating that they were burning down the buildings as a means of protesting. Comprehension.............
 
That’s not what we were talking about. These Nazis are not WWII nazis. I guarantee I know more about nazis and what lead to their rise to power than you do. I’m 100% pro liberty and they are definitely against my beliefs. But shutting down offensive speech is why we have a 1st amendment. Fight their ideas with your ideas not with clubs.

When any group, past or present, has the same ideology and wants damn near the same results as another group, then they are basically the same.
 
While I think white supremacist groups are deplorable and disgusting, I am concerned when people start denying access to things based on what that individual believes to be morally repugnant.

While I'm not trying to make a direct comparison between the two, there are plenty of people here who say "Hooray that Tim Cook won't let these people use Apple pay", who also said "How dare Oregonian bakers not make a cake for a gay wedding."

I'm not sure I want to live in a country where people use economics to force their morality on others (even when I agree with their morality), and be honest, that's what Apple is doing here. And I've seen people twist any view that they don't believe in into "hate speech."

I hear what you're saying and understand why it might make you uncomfortable. But in this case I think Apple is doing the right thing, these are Nazis, we know what they represent - the end of freedom, the end of our ability to even discuss these things openly. We fought a world war to defeat them. There is no alternative morality in which they, white supremacists are correct. If we allow them the space they want they would subjugate or destroy anyone or thing that did not fit their ideal. They are the antithesis of freedom, of individuality, of reason and of democracy. We tried appeasing them before, it did not end well. A line must be drawn, ideally by the President of the United States but in his absence by everyone else. We should all take a stand, Apple should too.
 
This would be great if Apple had donated to truly non-partisan organizations, but the SPLC pushes a left wing agenda.
 
While I think white supremacist groups are deplorable and disgusting, I am concerned when people start denying access to things based on what that individual believes to be morally repugnant.

While I'm not trying to make a direct comparison between the two, there are plenty of people here who say "Hooray that Tim Cook won't let these people use Apple pay", who also said "How dare Oregonian bakers not make a cake for a gay wedding."

I'm not sure I want to live in a country where people use economics to force their morality on others (even when I agree with their morality), and be honest, that's what Apple is doing here. And I've seen people twist any view that they don't believe in into "hate speech."

No.
This has nothing to do with conservatism, traditionalism, or using economics to force morality on others.
You can have all the free speech or the conservatism you like, but when someone comes to you and says " My free speech and my personal morality says that I am entitled to put you and your family in a gas chamber and kill you , or make you become my slave, beat you and rape you at will ", you can't just go : " Oh well, you are entitled to your opinion, please do kill my familiy or make us your slave and beat/rape us at will".
It is VERY easy to draw the line between even the most conservative, traditionnalist and unprogressive views, and absolutely NOT acceptable views.

There is a very clear line today that murder, pedophilia and slavery are simply not acceptable and are not just mere point of views that can be philosophically debated.
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.