Why? What possible harm is it causing you to allow Android users to use iMessage? Or did you just say that because anything non Apple = bad.good. shut it down.
Why? What possible harm is it causing you to allow Android users to use iMessage? Or did you just say that because anything non Apple = bad.good. shut it down.
It certainly wouldn’t be a good look for Apple to charge for something every other similar app for free. You tell me how much they should charge for a chat app. Maybe bundle it with Apple One?How much should they charge for it? All of Apple’s major cross-platform apps generate revenue in some way, the most prominent being Apple TV and Apple Music, both of which require a monthly subscription.
That’s the funniest thing of it all. The arrogance lmaoThe CEO was almost doing a press evangelism tour about how Apple wouldn't be able to touch his solution and wasn't morally justified in doing so. he poked the bear then twisted its arm.
edit: link to the video
How much should they charge for it? All of Apple’s major cross-platform apps generate revenue in some way, the most prominent being Apple TV and Apple Music, both of which require a monthly subscription.
Just because Telegram is free doesn't mean it's free to operate.Yeah, because few additional iMessage users surely means Apple has to charge for this service...
Because Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal is not free. It's like messaging service is resource heavy or something.
Yes when blackberry was dead lmao.This is categorically untrue. BBM eventually was made available as an app for both iOS and Android.
I have not deleted well over 10’yeaes of messages lmao. The messages are not counting that much to my storageAs IMessage's counts against your measly free 5GB of storage Apple are already generating revenue from many with additional monthly storage fee's
Keep your messages up to date with iCloud
Get an overview of what you can do with iCloud and Messages.support.apple.com
Uh, that's some nice conspiracy over there. No actual evidence of such bold claim unfortunately. How shocking.Signal is being funded by the CIA as a means of undermining oppressive governments.
It's about easily being able to share high quality media with each other.
Yeah but they were charging money for apples ProductThat’s a shame. I don’t have an android, but it would be nice for them to have the option. Apple should just release an iMessage app.
I suspect they have one ready to go, though.
The developers of this app were covered legally due to laws around reverse engineering for inter operability purposes, I believe.
On a subpar os that you are craving to use iOS features like iMessage.Naw. I enjoy watching videos on an 8 inch screen that folds into a 6.3 inch one.
Quite possible if you don't have many friends LOL, but may others doI have not deleted well over 10’yeaes of messages lmao. The messages are not counting that much to my storage
I’ve honestly never gotten a spam message via iMessage in 10 years.It looks like the 'authenticated' ability to send iMessage described may have been the loophole/backdoor which permitted spams/malicious-content that have been swamping in over last few years. Great to have this loophole closed and hopefully less or no more spams/malicious iMessages.
Lmao again 10 plus years. Lots of pics and a lots of stupid high school group chats and even our work group chat.Quite possible if you don't have many friends LOL, but may others do
“A few” = 3.6 billion Android users.Yeah, because few additional iMessage users surely means Apple has to charge for this service...
Because Telegram, WhatsApp and Signal is not free. It's like messaging service is resource heavy or something.
Similar free apps have ads. You want ads in iMessage? I don’t.It certainly wouldn’t be a good look for Apple to charge for something every other similar app for free. You tell me how much they should charge for a chat app. Maybe bundle it with Apple One?
I don’t know the solution, dude. But the fact is: Every viable scenario is in Apple’s hands. Apple is the only reason we’re having these dumb conversations. Only Apple can end it.
Apple is a business not a charity. They develop for Apple. They can choose to open source something just like any other business can. They shouldn't be forced to. If you or anyone likes something Apple makes. You should pay for it. If you don't, you don't pay for it and don't use it.Shame, but they needed to do this from a legal standpoint.
I just hope that they (Apple) have wisdom to merge iMessage with their future RCS rollout, rather than just have two systems interoperate. Actually improve RCS by open-sourcing iMessage. I doubt that will happen, but it would be the best path for everyone.
Only if you use Messages in iCloud, which you don’t have to do. That’s your choice.As IMessage's counts against your measly free 5GB of storage Apple are already generating revenue from many with additional monthly storage fee's
Keep your messages up to date with iCloud
Get an overview of what you can do with iCloud and Messages.support.apple.com
Yes and you can equally stay under the 5GB threshold too if you choose, however many do not so there is a mechanism for Apple to generate revenue from IMessage's already, is the pointOnly if you use Messages in iCloud, which you don’t have to do. That’s your choice.
As people have said over and over again, it is largely iOS users who choose to only use iMessage and nothing else. In the U.S.Which you can do on countless of other cross platform apps.
Y’all are literally making a big deal out of nothing and still don’t have iMessage.
Meanwhile on iPhone….
Oh please. It works fine for me.On a subpar os that you are craving to use iOS features like iMessage.
Because every Android user cares for reverse engineered iMessage, yes...“A few” = 3.6 billion Android users.
Say "I did not use WhatsApp" without saying it. WhatsApp does not have any ads. Yes, I'm using it as a primary messanger, so I would know that. Not a single ad. You don't know what you're talkinig about.You think those apps don’t make money? Telegram and WhatsApp both have ads. Telegram also sells subscriptions. Do you want ads in iMessage? Or an iMessage subscription? Signal relies on donors; who knows how long that will be sustainable for.
That's where I agree with you. But you know what?Apple makes money from you buying their hardware. That’s why iMessage is free on Apple devices. If you’re using an Android device and have no Apple hardware, what incentive would Apple have to provide a free service? That makes absolutely no sense. Paying Apple customers would be subsidizing that.