Apple Arcade is *******e and dying
I have no idea about the "dying" part, but the first part I agree with completely
Apple Arcade is *******e and dying
So we should be subjugated by big government instead? Or is that only when they make a decision you agree with? How far down that rabbit hole are you willing to go? I'm willing to bet that would ruin the world a lot worse than Apple not allowing you to install "whatever you want".Fellow Americans, please listen. Your willingness to be subjugated by big corporations will ruin the world. For what absurd reason do you think that Apple should be allowed to behave as a bully just because is rich and powerful? When I buy an iPhone with my own hard earned money, the iPhone is my property. I should be allowed to install on it whatever I want and not only what Apple concedes because it satisfies their greed. I really wish that all those here claiming that Apple is right are doing so because they own a vast amount of Apple shares. Otherwise it’s very difficult to understand your reasoning.
Your first analogy/question was decent, but then you ruined it with that second one.The same way Nintendo does with the switch, and Sony with the PS5? Why won't my Blu-ray player play VHS tapes?
That’s a good point. The new mint colour is really nice. Tim Cook has justified his salary with that colour alone.What about the new Watch Band colors though?
So we should be subjugated by big government instead?
This post is an example of being so engulfed in your own narrative that you are willing to ignore reality. Apple didn't publicize any of this until it was over. This obviously could have been resolved behind closed doors if Sweeney didn't "pull a PR stunt."There's no defending Epic because that's not the point. Apple has tried to pull a PR stunt, but the crux of the matter is that they abused the control they were allowed to retain for security purposes in order to paint Epic as the evil company. The truth is that under the DMA, Apple shouldn't have the power to block apps for reasons other than security, so, should they pull something like this again, I reckon they'd be fined almost immediately by the EU.
So we should be subjugated by big government instead? Or is that only when they make a decision you agree with? How far down that rabbit hole are you willing to go? I'm willing to bet that would ruin the world a lot worse than Apple not allowing you to install "whatever you want".
I dont think i said anything about whether it is working for them financially or not, i said the percentage price is fair in my opinion as a developer.Epics game store is an Epic failure and only taking 12% has not helped them at all. Didn't the court documents show how bad it was?
That’s a good point. The new mint colour is really nice. Tim Cook has justified his salary with that colour alone.
Because the headline "Apple and Epic come to an agreement that allows Epic to return the iPhone" isn't going to get many clicks.Here's how it's seen by others
XDA Developers - Apple lets Epic Games back on the App Store after a DMA scolding
Yahoo Finance - Apple retreats in Epic feud, allows Fortnite return in EU
PCMag Australia - Apple Backs Down, Will Allow Epic Games to Create iOS App Store in EU
I can go on....
A week or so. I'm looking forward to that one.How long before Epic breaks their promises and Apple gets to dump them again?
So you acknowledge that's it's a technical issue then, unlike Apple's dictating of who can sell what to iPhone users and how much of a cut they'll take for the privilege. Fantastic, I'm glad we could agree those are two very different scenarios.Seems VERY unfair doesn't it? I want too play my HD DVDs on my PS5. Why is Sony acting like jerks?
I'm wondering what all these people are going to do/say when the EU mandates they must have a backdoor to all encryption.So we should be subjugated by big government instead? Or is that only when they make a decision you agree with? How far down that rabbit hole are you willing to go? I'm willing to bet that would ruin the world a lot worse than Apple not allowing you to install "whatever you want".
If your take is true we wouldn’t have had 15yrs of the App Store! It’s been an unmitigated success and paid out billions to developers and started thousands of devs shops etc. if they were all so impeded by this 30% (15% I think it’s is now right?) then no one would have survived.Not all companies are governed by greed.
Smaller companies will fight for the users with cheaper prices, same for the rival app stores, they cant hope to attract users if they will charge same 30% apple does, they will go to 10-15% tops for pay to play games and subscription kind of apps.
Epic takes 12% for their PC Game sales, which is reasonable in my opinion.
I know a bunch of clients we develop web sites/apps for that charge less money because they refuse to publish their apps in the apple app store and simply use progressive web app we develop for them.
If Apple makes a decision that is largely disliked, people stop buying it. Nobody is forced to buy an iPhone.I think we don't want either to get too big? Limited government and controlled capitalism, or something.
I'm wondering what all these people are going to do/say when the EU mandates they must have a backdoor to all encryption.
Should we be subjugated by big government? No. However, I'm certainly willing to draw the line somewhere other than "allow corporations to operate with impunity."So we should be subjugated by big government instead? Or is that only when they make a decision you agree with? How far down that rabbit hole are you willing to go? I'm willing to bet that would ruin the world a lot worse than Apple not allowing you to install "whatever you want".
Im fairly sure that these days App Stores whether from Apple or Google are GeoBased, so if a developer publishes their app for only US market, i from EU wont be able to find it in the app store or i will but it will say the app is not yet available in your location.Aren’t these like cross region license agreements with different jurisdictions?
On one hand a dev’s contract with Apple USA can contain whatever clauses both sides agree to (i.e. charge per download).
On the other hand the eu can insist anyone can run an App Store on devices sold in the EU.
I’m not even sure the two things are mutually exclusive. Apple would not be impeding any devs from releasing in the EU with that charge. Or does the DMA explicitly say otherwise?
If Apple makes a decision that is largely disliked, people stop buying it. Nobody is forced to buy an iPhone.
Like this?I'm wondering what all these people are going to do/say when the EU mandates they must have a backdoor to all encryption.
Absolutely... people tend to forget that Apple does all kinds of crap for Chinese gov whenever they order them to give info about chinese users and other things because China is a huge ass market that apple cant afford to get banned from, especially when they manufacture lots if not most of their products there..Well yes. Apple does bend over backwards to comply with China's laws.
Oy! Now I have to wonder if my kids really like me🤔 or it's Stockholm syndrome.😬
People who are pro DMA are likely going to also have very strong views about encryption. I would say there is a big overlap in this venn diagram.I'm wondering what all these people are going to do/say when the EU mandates they must have a backdoor to all encryption.
Stop, they didn't even get that far. Most likely Tim S apologized and promised he would behave.Wrong
They were forced to backtrack by the EU.
Embarrassing stuff from Apple. PATHETIC even.