no quad core in this MBP is just pathetic.
So, anyway care to guess why no Core 2 Quad in the new MBP? The chips with low TDP are available. Doesn't bode well for quad in the iMac (in the mini was too much to hope for).
no quad core in this MBP is just pathetic.
How can they say it can last 5 years with 1,000 charges worth?
That means they have to had tested that battery with this macbook pro 5 years ago. :T
1000 FULL discharges and recharges. As in draining completely down and then charging it all the way back up.
To put it into perspective, I used my MBP for about 18 month now and I have 283 cycles on it.
I'm in the euro-zone and I'm considering going to the UK because it's so cheap there. Isn't the financial market funny.
Well, obviously Apple is no longer about this group of people. If this was a serious "pro" notebook, it would incorporate bluray. As a video professional, I can tell you that bluray is something that clients (for example, if you produce wedding videos) want. But, as with the removal of firewire from the MB's, Apple is making it clear that they want to be nothing but a consumer electronics company and they are abandoning the musician/artist/video pro markets. Thats their perogative but, likewise, it's mine to look elsewhere to fill my needs
Apple know what they are doing, even though they did let us down today.
Blu-Ray still isn't the standard format yet, and although people like bluray, why can't you buy HD movies from the iTunes store. I never really saw the difference in HD and blu-ray.
Apple will do it, but just not yet. They don't feel that people are using it standard. And they are not wrong, but if they want a high end laptop, thats what there gonna have to offer
i do agree that physical media will get less unpopular, but not dissapear.
Because they have been dissaapointing today, means there might be a build up to some awesome products, like we were expecting at Macworld today.
Really suprised no info was made on snoleo... Not one word about it... I'm not sure about snow leopard.. I know it's about speed but the more i think about it, the duller it seems. My Mac is already pretty fast.
Oh well.. I'm getting a bit off topic now
-Sam
The Unibody construction does not work so well with the 17" size, too much flexing probably and not readily fixable with thicker fabrication. So having a removable battery creates too much weakness, bit like chopping the roof off a sedan. But fix the battery in permanent and it becomes a stiffener for the unibody. That's why it was all delayed, they have been rushing around fabbing a new battery.
As for backups, Time Machine is great, but if your house burns down and your notebook and Time Machine drive are both there.... I currently cycle out portable hard drives stored at my office for offsite backup of critical data, but being able to burn archival Blu-ray media would be a better option -- no need to spin up the drives every few months, no worries about my backup drive crashing.
Who would pay $5000 for a computer? If you would, you should consider buying a Mac Pro, a 15-in MacBook Pro, and a Apple display for about the same price.
So why would one want Blu-Ray drives on their laptop? Maybe because they already own a collection of movies in Blu-Ray? Why should I have to buy different media to view it on my laptop? Duh. It's got nothing to do with watching a high res movie on a laptop. It's about having access to what you already own and is doable on other EXISTING computers. I EXPECT to be able to play CD's, DVD's and Blu-Rays on a high end $2K+ computer and do what I. That's not too much to ask for.
Pay extra for matte
Stupid idea to put BluRay on a laptop, right? Thats why Sony, HP, and a few others are beginning to make serious sales/revenue in the positive due to similar moves like this? Do you NOT take your laptop with you; especially to visit friends/family? Would it not be nice to compose a near PRO video on your laptop for presentation at the FilmFestival? Or just show movies at the family place on their TV with DisplayPort adapter? This alone should be a reason they should consider. At $50 for non-gloss display on high-end laptop if millions sold SHOULD be pretty close to the licensing "issues" that Apple who is NOT in ANY DEBT cannot seem to resolve, while other manufacturers CAN. Sorry but I cannot palate that excuse any longer. No I don't own a Mac yet but have been busing my ASS off and watching for a solid purchase that I can be happy with.
several points here:
2. To the people complaining about lack of blu-ray, what do you need it for? Backups can be done with time machine, and do you really need to watch high definition films on a 17" screen? Wouldn't that just run the battery life down when you are out, and if you are at home would you not watch them on your tv instead?
3. I see no problem with the battery being fixed, If you are going to carry your laptop about for extended periods would you not be better off with a smaller model? Personally, I can count on one hand the number of times my macbook (18 months old) has been used long enough away from a power socket to actually run out of battery. 8 Hours is surely long enough for the vast majority of users.
it.
I must admit that I was slightly disappointed that there were no revisions to the iMac. I've been waiting for MWSF to see if any the hardware would be updated. Are there any updates about this besides the Buyer's Guide?
If your house burns down and you are in the house with your MacBook, it doesn't matter whether you lose your Time Machine backup or not. And if you're outside the house with your MacBook, everything is fine (if you are insured). Just don't leave the house without your MacBook.
But tell me, how long do you think Blu-ray media will last? And how confident are you about it? I am sure I wouldn't want to rely on Blu-ray discs for backups.
a screen is a screen.
The black bezzel is part of the glass thats on the screen. Underneath that is the same sliver.
I can tell. Just watching some TV shows on my 13" macbook. I can tell the difference from fringe (which I bought in SD) and the sneek peak of LOST whits I got for free in both HD and SD.
HD is HD, and you can clearly see the diference. Doesnt matter what size screen you have.
If apple ever went in to the netbook world, expect them to charge close to $1000 for one.
8 Hour battery and 1000 cycles is amazing...no other laptop offers that.
But tell me, how long do you think Blu-ray media will last? And how confident are you about it? I am sure I wouldn't want to rely on Blu-ray discs for backups.
My understanding is that the media will last for quite some time, having at least the shelf life of DVDs, so I wouldn't be too worried about it...
If your house burns down and you are in the house with your MacBook, it doesn't matter whether you lose your Time Machine backup or not. And if you're outside the house with your MacBook, everything is fine (if you are insured). Just don't leave the house without your MacBook.
But tell me, how long do you think Blu-ray media will last? And how confident are you about it? I am sure I wouldn't want to rely on Blu-ray discs for backups.
I dont get why people think apple will take over the media world with iTunes. come on....
Wirelessly posted (iPhone: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 2_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/525.18.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Mobile/5G77 Safari/525.20)
I wonder how much the take back and recycling program will cost the owner. Just a thought.