OK we get it. You understand bit density. What we need to know is if the 4200rpm 200GB drives can capture video without any frame drop outs. Do you know that?ChrisA said:Why is it that in the "Mac World" people seen tho measure disk preformance by how fast the platters spin. That's like looking at the Tachometer in your car to see how fast you are going.
What matters is the "bit rate" This is the product of the tangential speed of the platter under the read/write head time the "bit density". So for example of the platter were going at 100 inches per second and it had 1000 bits per inch the bit rate would be 100,000 bits per second. Simple?
These newer high capasity drives, 160GB and even 200GB hold nore data. You might guess that the reason they hold more data is they use a higher "bit density". More density and same rotational speed means they are faster.
It you care about battery life the best way to make a drive faster is not to spin it faster but to double the bit density.
milo said:<snip>
Here's the link on the apple site:
http://www.apple.com/support/store/postpurchase.html
"Price protection
If Apple reduces the price on any product within 10 calendar days of shipment, you can request a refund or credit of the difference between the price you were charged and the current price."
There's more info on the page.
milo said:I think you're confused. You mean the processor with the higher clock rate, right?
ChrisA said:Why is it that in the "Mac World" people seen tho measure disk preformance by how fast the platters spin. That's like looking at the Tachometer in your car to see how fast you are going.
What matters is the "bit rate" This is the product of the tangential speed of the platter under the read/write head time the "bit density". So for example of the platter were going at 100 inches per second and it had 1000 bits per inch the bit rate would be 100,000 bits per second. Simple?
These newer high capasity drives, 160GB and even 200GB hold nore data. You might guess that the reason they hold more data is they use a higher "bit density". More density and same rotational speed means they are faster.
It you care about battery life the best way to make a drive faster is not to spin it faster but to double the bit density.
CPTMONK said:hey i just bought a new 15" macbook pro my first mac,
i do alot of video editing
am i right in think the 5400rpm is only bad when CAPTURING video footage, does it make a difference when you edit?
countach said:Hmm.............,
Macbook Pro 15", 2GB RAM, 120 MB drive - $2174
Black Macbook, 2GB RAM, 120MB drive - $2199
WHAT's WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?????
bodeh6 said:Those who bought their Computer in August should be happy with what they got since that was what was the best available at the time. And what are you talking about not in the forecast? The previous revision was here for just over 6 months. From April 2006 to October 2006. How long do you want Apple to go with out updates?
CPTMONK said:hey i just bought a new 15" macbook pro my first mac,
i do alot of video editing
am i right in think the 5400rpm is only bad when CAPTURING video footage, does it make a difference when you edit?
The Former, no question.daneoni said:Pick one 2.16GHz/160GB HDD or 2.33GHz/120GB HDD. If you had to choose...?
You will miss that extra 40GB of internal HD space more than you will notice the difference in processor speed - especially if you are going to run XP or Vista on it as well. Even though it rotates slower - i.e. cooler - the 160 will perform as well as the 120 due to higher bit density in the 160.clintob said:The latter, no question. Faster drive speed + faster processor = better performance. You wont miss the 40GB locally. If you're using up that much space, you should really have an external drive anyway. It's a notebook, not a storage device.
That would be next Spring sir.4np said:all very nice indeed; but where is that ATI Radeon Mobility X1800?![]()
reflex said:Wonderful update. I hope the 160GB upgrade isn't too expensive...
Multimedia said:2GB Standard on both top models is really huge and generous. 'Bout time they did that on these expensive mobiles.
The MagSafe Airline Power Adapter is a pretty big and welcome deal too.
Almost looks like a processor drop in. I expected 2.33GHz standard. Glad to see that. The return of the FW800 port to the 15" is welcome news. Now the 15" model is on par with the old PowerBook G4 port layout.
Anyone know how well the 4200rpm 200GB HD performs? Could feel just as responsive as faster smaller drives due to plate density no?
Don't see any sign of the MacBook easy access HD Bay design. That's a big disappointment to me. No change to the screen resolutions
5400 will also capture DV fine.theWholeTruth said:If you do alot of video editing you should know the answer. Uncompressed 10-bit will lag on 5400rpm. Other than that, 5400 is fine, even for something like hdv or uncompressed 8-bit. You aren't capturing to your system drive, eh?
markw10 said:I'm going to purchase one of the new MBP's and am interested in purchasing a new C2D MBP. I had previously looked at the other MBP and was going to upgrade the hard drive to a 120. As well, I was going to upgrade the memory to 2GB. Now 1GB is standard and as well the 120 is standard. Well now I want to go to a 160. I know there's a 200 but I don't want to have that decrease in speed. I didn't even know 200's were available. As for the upgrades, is it cheaper for me to buy the stock unit and do the upgrades on my own or am I better off just buying from Apple and getting it with 2gb and the 160 gig hard drive? How hard is it to do these upgrades?
clintob said:100GB is MORE than enough to run any number of Pro Apps you might use, and if you store a lot of large video or audio files, etc, you should be using an external firewire drive anyway.
Multimedia said:The Former, no question.You will miss that extra 40GB of internal HD space more than you will notice the difference in processor speed - especially if you are going to run XP or Vista on it as well. Even though it rotates slower - i.e. cooler - the 160 will perform as well as the 120 due to higher bit density in the 160.