Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"We are making progress, and we’re committed to being as innovative in advancing diversity as we are in developing our products."

What does this mean? Does it mean they just discriminate against anyone who won't help their numbers?

Yes -- that is exactly what it means.
 
As a female and a minority (black) who happens to be interested in tech (but got started way too late). I think that while efforts at the top are important ultimately real change (that doesn't feel unfair etc.) will have to come earlier during education.

Gender stereotypes and issues with access to technology and/or good computer science classes (not offered or emphasized by lower income schools btw) is probably the real issue. If you don't know that something is an option or you think (as a kid) that because you are female you shouldn't be interested in that option it is of course going to skew the numbers once we look much later down the line at the professions that people choose. I would much rather effort be spent on early education to narrow the gender and race gap than focusing on the hiring practices of companies from an applicant pool which probably does have a lower proportion of qualified female and minority candidates.

Yes, gender and ethnic diversity DO matter. Living in a society where class is de facto based on race is only a little better than living in a caste based society. It truly does limit opportunities in an unfair manner (I cannot begin to explain how terrible it feels to go to an academic meeting and the only other people of color in the whole building are the service staff. I've also experienced sexual harassment first hand that almost drove me out of my chosen career). BUT there is more than one way to go about fixing the problem. Increasing access to the beginning of the pipeline seems more fair (to me) than arbitrary quotas at the end.

That said if Apple wanted to hire ME to help their gender and race diversity (killing two birds with one stone) I wouldn't say no ;)
 
Here in mexico the (vast) major races are indigenous, european descent (caucasian) and mixed between the two. We are all mexican's, but those are the races of the vast majority. Hispanic is not a race, we are not all of the same race and people that try to claim it is are denying us our real race.

I agree with you. That's why I stated Hispanics is vague, I should note that I should have said it's used as a broad term instead. It would be a large discussion to talk about the races from all Hispanic/Latino countries. But as far as the Census goes, they lumped most Spanish speaking immigrants as Hispanics to better serve whatever community. Or at least that's the original intention. The same can be said about Blacks, we don't all have they same ethnic history.
 
Wait a second, who's the sexist here? You want women executives simply because they are women?

I didn't think I came off as sexist.

What I mean by saying I would like to see more women in executive positions is that in a perfect world, people at that position would closely resemble the overall population. Why? When one group is overrepresented, it points out structural issues that exist. It does not indicate that men are naturally better at those types of things, in my opinion. If men and women had the same level of training, exposure, role models, etc., at the highest level, men and women would be appropriately represented.
 
My question is what if there was a white candidate and a black candidate for a position; they have identical, literally identical portfolios, and if quotas were not taken into account, who would be picked for the job?

What if you had three candidates with the exact same race/gender/qualifications and they all interviewed really well? Then it would come down to intangible things like personality or just the hiring manager's feeling on who would be the best fit.

Tim Cook has a degree in industrial engineering. We know he's big on numbers and spreadsheets. But you can't engineer diversity no matter how much he's pushing Apple HR to do so.
 
Sorry - I hadn't noticed that you are in Mexico. In America, we have laws which prohibit companies from discriminating against minorities, women, people of color, and those who prefer specific genders. Those same laws work by default to discriminate against White males.

Yes, I know but my point is that discrimination is discrimination no matter who it is against.

It's far more racist here in mexico, racism is even rampant in the school system. Even a slight amount of skin color difference is seized upon to use. Darker skinned people get discriminated against here on all levels. Work, etc. and it's not mostly white on darker skin it's brown against darker skin. Also against people from countries south of us.
 
I hate when people use "Steve wouldn't have" but in this case I think Steve wouldn't have released this data. I don't think Steve was as politically correct as Tim is.

Steve Jobs saw right through rubbish like this.
 
Here in mexico the (vast) major races are indigenous, european descent (caucasian) and mixed between the two. We are all mexican's, but those are the races of the vast majority. Hispanic is not a race, we are not all of the same race and people that try to claim it is are denying us our real race.

This happens a LOT. Everywhere.
There are so many people who don’t understand it’s discrimination based on race, and equally as much who don’t deem themselves a racist because they don’t walk around in a pointy hat.
Fools.
 
Actually, by legal definition, everyone except for heterosexual White males is privileged by affirmative action and non-discrimination policies.

And how do you know what color the posters in this forum might be? Do you have intel I don't? And so what if they are White? Would you be against them for being White? Wouldn't that make you racist?

Okay, you've convinced me. This is a war against the white man. Thank goodness I'm black, and good luck with your struggle. Keep your head up in these hard times.
 
You liberals never get anything.
Don't even bother. It is as pointless as an evangelical talking to a Jehovah's Witness about bible scripture. The JW will never go off script. It is drilled into their head to stay on script no matter what. They certainly cannot entertain the idea of considering any other view point but their own. The fact is racism is racism. There is no such thing as "positive" discrimination or "reverse" racism. The colour of one's skin does not give a right to discriminate against another person.

I am positive that MLK would be in agreement with me even though I am a white person from northern Europe and in disagreement with the majority of "African Americans" living today. He wanted people to be judged by their character. I don't even like that moniker "African American" because Africa is a continent and not a country or a people. Do people go around calling white people "European Americans"? No.

If you are not a first generation immigrant then you are just a plain American full stop.
 
Last edited:
What if you had three candidates with the exact same race/gender/qualifications and they all interviewed really well? Then it would come down to intangible things like personality or just the hiring manager's feeling on who would be the best fit.

Tim Cook has a degree in industrial engineering. We know he's big on numbers and spreadsheets. But you can't engineer diversity no matter how much he's pushing Apple HR to do so.

I can agree with this 100%, instances like this do occur. But without quotas I think hiring would have different ulterior motives behind it.
 
It's silly to call for diversity when Tim Cook himself continues to hide his homossexuality. Is this the kind of example he wants to set at Apple? "Stay hidden and don't tell anyone about it"?

I get your point, but at the same time it's his private life, so he has every right to deny, confirm, or ignore any question related to his personal life.
 
I really don't like posting in PRSI and I avoid it, but having said that:

I was a hiring manager for a Fortune 50-sized company. That means I hired people to work on my team.

I didn't do the recruiting; there was a separate recruiting department for that.

When I'd have a open spot, I'd send the requirements to the recruiter assigned to me.

The recruiter would do the first pass at thinning the CVs and apps down to a manageable set. This is typically helpful as you can (and will) get thousands of people applying for attractive jobs, but most aren't anywhere near qualified ("I was a baker, but I'm looking to break into nuclear physics").

The company was extremely sensitive to diversity. I'm not sure, but I do wonder if they had been sued for discrimination at some point.

Here's the rub: the recruiters would push "diversity" candidates very strongly. They would also hint very strongly that I would be "getting credit" for selecting a diversity candidate.

Indeed, on more than one occasion, I'd be told that "this candidate is both female and a minority - double bonus on this one!" (One can imagine the triple and even quadruple bonus scenarios, they did exist)

Any mention of past experience, skill set? Nope. Wasn't material for them.

To be clear, if they had the qualifications and skill set needed, I had no worries at all at hiring a "double bonus" person. But qualifications come first. Having said that, I did have some Chinese women on my team that totally kicked butt, I would have cloned them if that were an option. I also inherited a quadriplegic during a departmental shift, he did a great job while he was around (RIP).

I'm not sure everyone that was a hiring manager had the same outlook as I did, we became weighed down with a lot of clueless people (both "diversity" and not) and Steve Job's "Bozo factor" started it's corrosive action.

The company is no longer Fortune 50 sized, it's down in the 300 range and headed even lower. Not all of this is due to the Bozo factor, but some of it is.

Is the "Bozo factor" when you hire too many "diversity" people? It would make sense!
 
You guys all got it wrong. The diversity at Apple is primarily about gender, not race! That's why Tim Cook is hiring female executives. From the numbers, I don't see Apple has a race diversity issue here; in fact other tech companies have much 'worse' numbers in that area.

On the other hand, it seems Tim Cook is too eager to solve a 'problem' that's really not Apple's. There are just not many female geeks.
 
Actually, by legal definition, everyone except for heterosexual White males is privileged by affirmative action and non-discrimination policies.

And how do you know what color the posters in this forum might be? Do you have intel I don't? And so what if they are White? Would you be against them for being White? Wouldn't that make you racist?

My intel tells me you are under-educated. :cool:
 
You are talking about economic class based problems. There are poor white people too and many will never get a leg up because of their lack of formal education and marketable skills. I agree that something needs to be done to fix that, but its not a problem that is limited to minorities.

But it is a problem that disproportionately affects minorities compared to whites.
 
Here in mexico the (vast) major races are indigenous, european descent (caucasian) and mixed between the two. We are all mexican's, but those are the races of the vast majority. Hispanic is not a race, we are not all of the same race and people that try to claim it is are denying us our real race.

Thank you! You are spot on in your assessment, and bolster my love of Mexico and the Mexican people. It's time we all return to rational thinking, and dispel this heinous era of political correctness and reverse discrimination against White males in America, Europe, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and elsewhere. We have been oppressed!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.