Lion must not be doing to well if there releasing a full revision like this after just a year. I hope its not expensive, and that it is to lion what snow leopard was to leopard.
Thanks, I was waiting for a full resolution version.
I...you're trolling, right?
Are any of you even reading the articles or reviews before posting here?
It's been said dozens of times already, but I'll say it again for you. Only this time in bold.
Gatekeeper has three, 3, as in 1, 2, 3, settings. One of the settings completely turns it off, meaning you can install whatever the hell you want.
I...you're trolling, right?
Are any of you even reading the articles or reviews before posting here?
It's been said dozens of times already, but I'll say it again for you. Only this time in bold.
Gatekeeper has three, 3, as in 1, 2, 3, settings. One of the settings completely turns it off, meaning you can install whatever the hell you want.
I...you're trolling, right?
Are any of you even reading the articles or reviews before posting here?
It's been said dozens of times already, but I'll say it again for you. Only this time in bold.
Gatekeeper has three, 3, as in 1, 2, 3, settings. One of the settings completely turns it off, meaning you can install whatever the hell you want.
So if Apple is going to an annual upgrade cycle, and you don't want to upgrade every 12 months, won't you just choose to do every second or third upgrade and skip the ones in between? So if you're ready to deploy Lion now, why wouldn't you go ahead and do that, and skip Mountain Lion when it ships in late summer? Then when Ocelot () ships in summer 2013, you adopt that and deploy it in 2014. Apple's gonna do what Apple wants to do, and annual updates may make sense for consumers, to stay in closer step with iDevices; for business users, we'll just choose to skip some of the upgrades. (I say this as I look around my office of Macs running at lot of Leopard, some Snow Leopard, and no Lion -- which I'm planning to move to this summer.)
They already left out some of the machines that do support Lion, seems they're also going to be limiting by GPU
I agree with them doing this. We shouldn't be restrained by severely dated 32bit hardware anymore, its 2012, where everything supports 64 bit and has done for a few years, except those pesky old bits of hardware.
It makes for some desirable wallpaper...I still don't understand the "spaces" themes with OS X. Ever since 10.5, I get it as "Spaces" and the "new frontier" were themes then, but now? Just seems... odd.
Well, I'm pretty much through with Macs. I may keep one around for iOS development, but I'll no longer use it as my main machine. Gatekeeper has killed any interest I have in Apple's desktop products. Shame as I do like the iPhone and iPad -- but those are the only reason why I'll even own any Mac at all going forward.
Thanks, I was waiting for a full resolution version.
It's the default to allow any app.
Not sure if this was already discussed, but like many of you this news came out of the blue. Am I the only one a little concerned about this? Normally Apple has some big press shindig touting all the new features, yet this time its just quietly added to the Apple site. I've felt Apple has been abandoning Mac and OS X more and more in favor of iOS, and with this it seems even more so.
Is my concern unwarranted?
(On a side note none of the new features they're outlining really seem all the interesting, at least to me. I'm sure I'll upgrade since I'm a sucker for updates, but this seems like an "ehh" moment.)
Exactly, which makes it even less of a big deal.
This is interesting. I have a late 2008 MBP (The first Unibody MBP) and according to this list mine isn't supported but the first 13" Unibody MacBook is.
Wonder why this is as I have a discreet GPU in mine!
- D
EDIT: Actually I'm confused by that list because it does say Core2Duo 2.4 in brackets so I'm in the 'it might be' camp!)
I tell you what.
Just finished upgrading and this Lion ROARS. It is fast as hell.
As someone that runs 100's of dual boot macs in a University, I find the frequency of OS versions really tiresome.
Personally it looks decent, I am still on snow leopard though haven't felt the need at all to move to lion.
How come Gizmodo didn't get an early copy of Mountain Lion too? Bwahaha!
Lion must not be doing to well if there releasing a full revision like this after just a year. I hope its not expensive, and that it is to lion what snow leopard was to leopard.