I'm sure as engineers they appreciate the expandability, better specs, and cheaper price tag.Are you implying that at Apple engineers use hackintoshes to test new OS releases as their main machines?![]()
I'm sure as engineers they appreciate the expandability, better specs, and cheaper price tag.Are you implying that at Apple engineers use hackintoshes to test new OS releases as their main machines?![]()
He's talking about bugs. What you're summing up here are exactly that: bugs! Bugs can be security related, they don't have to be though.
Which again is completely wrong. OS X, Linux and Windows have different release and development cycles. These cycles sometimes dictate when they release bug fixes and patch sets (10.6.5 and the like are patch sets). Microsoft wanted to control the load on their servers (actually its Akamais) so they changed their patch release schedule to the Tuesday patchday as we now know it. This means you can plan ahead as an IT professional which you can not do with Linux/OS X. On the other hand this causes a very very big problem: you have to wait for a fix which you don't with Linux/OS X. That's why Microsoft is lagging behind when things go bad regarding security of their products. Open source projects such as Firefox and Linux tend to respond an awful lot faster.
Due to the open nature regarding open source products it is very easy to check for bugs. The closed nature of Microsoft does not allow you to do this. That's the main reason why open source products have a lot more bug fixes than closed source ones. However this is not entirely true since you need people looking for bugs and fixing them. Since OS X uses quite a lot of open source it is not uncommon that it'll receive quite a lot of updates at times. Then again, there is Adobe Flash which eats away 42% of the security fixes in 10.6.5 (you don't get those with Windows; you need to redownload Flash yourself)! As you can imagine with Flash gone in future releases of OS X as well as Java this will decrease the amount of bug fixes.
And then we have something called severity and impact. The amount of bugs found do not say anything about those two aspects. Yet those two aspects define "risk" which is the most important thing about a bug. That's what you want to use when talking about bugs. That combined with the amount of time they need to get the bug resolved is what defines if a piece of software is utter crap or not.
So the only thing you're actually saying is that you have absolutely no clue what on earth you're talking about. In other words, move along, nothing to talk about...
--------
Ontopic: I've seen two Macs that had their firewall switched off after being updated. One Mac still had the firewall turned on. They prolly have changed something regarding firewalling on the other machines I guess.
You might want to take a look at the security updates that are in 10.6.5. Quite a lot are for Adobe Flash (some website estimated that 42% of 10.6.5's security updates were in fact Adobe Flash updates).
What a long winded response that does nothing to address my assertion. Security bugs are one thing - resolving an issue when dragging contacts from Address Book to iCal is an entirely different matter. The majority of fixes for Win 7 have been security related, the majority of fixes for SL has been functionality related. Big difference.
No business will do everything you want. I own my own business and I make decisions that I don't like. Apple is doing quite well. You don't make too many boneheaded decisions and have the sucess Apple has.
I am not happy with the QA issues that Apple has had. I don't see a way Apple could have avoided them while moving at the pace they do. When Apple has an issue, it is quite often blown well out of proportion. One example is the iP4 and the death grip. Yes, some people had issues. Most got better performance than the iP3.
DEEP SLEEP ARGUMENTS
deepsleep causes kernel power management to automatically hibernate a machine after it has slept for a specified time
period. This saves power while asleep. This setting defaults to ON for supported hardware. The setting deepsleep will be
visible in pmset -g if the feature is supported on this machine.
deepsleep only works if hibernation is turned on to hibernatemode 3 or 25.
deepsleepdelay specifies the delay, in seconds, before writing the hibernation image to disk and powering off memory for
Deep Sleep.
Wrong. You might want to re-read the threads. It was in fact you that started calling people names.
Now why don't you run along and using your own verbiage, S.T.F.U!
Microsoft does fewer, larger Service Packs. Apple does more point releases.
Both are valid approaches but Apple gets your fixes sooner than the service pack and avoids needing "patch tuesdays".
My W7 install is a nightmare - seems to need dozens of fixes every month. The fixes are not Windows fixes but they are to all the optional/additional components (like Security Essentials).
not trying to step on anyone's toes here but i can't help but getting the feeling that Macs/Apple isn't as magical as i thought out to be...i'm a first time Mac owner for a few weeks. It seems to me that there is allot of "lets keep our fingers crossed and hope that it works". wasn't OS x super stable and o so good in comparison to windows?
my MP had issues with the graphics card, no word from Apple about this problem that lots of people are experiencing, now an update comes out and from reading some of the posts i don't even want to update my system because the update might screw some things up.
i know there's no windows fans on here but to be honest i have never had this much trouble with a windows machine in 5 years than i had with a two month old mac pro that coasted me triple times the money.![]()
not trying to step on anyone's toes here but i can't help but getting the feeling that Macs/Apple isn't as magical as i thought out to be...i'm a first time Mac owner for a few weeks. It seems to me that there is allot of "lets keep our fingers crossed and hope that it works". wasn't OS x super stable and o so good in comparison to windows?
my MP had issues with the graphics card, no word from Apple about this problem that lots of people are experiencing, now an update comes out and from reading some of the posts i don't even want to update my system because the update might screw some things up.
i know there's no windows fans on here but to be honest i have never had this much trouble with a windows machine in 5 years than i had with a two month old mac pro that coasted me triple times the money.![]()
You argue semantics all you want. He's wrong and semantics don't change that. I called him a hypocrite, which he rightfully is and has not refuted.
I'm going to say the same thing as another poster, except I'll point out why it's good.not trying to step on anyone's toes here but i can't help but getting the feeling that Macs/Apple isn't as magical as i thought out to be...i'm a first time Mac owner for a few weeks. It seems to me that there is allot of "lets keep our fingers crossed and hope that it works". wasn't OS x super stable and o so good in comparison to windows?
my MP had issues with the graphics card, no word from Apple about this problem that lots of people are experiencing, now an update comes out and from reading some of the posts i don't even want to update my system because the update might screw some things up.
i know there's no windows fans on here but to be honest i have never had this much trouble with a windows machine in 5 years than i had with a two month old mac pro that coasted me triple times the money.![]()
I'm sure as engineers they appreciate the expandability, better specs, and cheaper price tag.
And as Apple engineers, they appreciate other factors even more, as do most of Apple's customers.
These other products are probably in the lab as curiosities to tear apart and examine how not to do it. e.g.: "Look what **** the competition thinks they can make money selling" (and probably will end up making very little compared to Apple.)
It's a "nightmare" that Windows quietly downloads and installs fixes during the night? I think that you exaggerate!![]()
I have a iMac 27", iMac11,1 model, Core i7 2,8 GHz with 8 GB RAM.
The graphic card is a ATI Radeon HD 4850 with 512 MB VRAM.
I'm also running 10.6.5 and I have the same score as 'okboy'.
OpenGL Graphics Test 326.40
Spinning Squares 414.06 frames/sec
How does Microsoft get root access to your machines over the Internet? Do they know your admin password, or have you authorized some setuid "helper" tool to run on their behalf?It's a "nightmare" that Windows quietly downloads and installs fixes during the night? I think that you exaggerate!
It is when it bricks your machine, which is what happened to me (and a buttload of other people using XP and certain AMD processors, about a year ago).
Happily MS fessed up, but that didn't prevent me from having to wipe the boot array and reinstall.
Another Apple customer overly concerned about Apple profits? There is something very unnatural about this.