It’s a big deal and very important. This is directly from Apple. 👇I don't really understand why there's so much fuzz about Safari? Like, did you all buy a $4000 M1 Max so you can watch Safari scroll at 120 Herz? Why is it so important?
Mistake? The Safari Developer Technology encompassing 120 Hz scrolling is an alpha release. Better to be safe than sorry with Safari.it is like when you pay that amount of cash for a laptop, especially from apple, M1...anyway, you want to benefit from everything that machine has to offer, in this case, 120hz scrolling. They didn't put the option by mistake though![]()
Exactly this, scrolling is definitely 120Hz on the included 15.3 version of Safari in macOS 12.2.It's silly to actually think TestUFO matters on whether pages scroll at 120hz or not. 120hz is enabled in 12.2 and has been since beta 1. Using testufo as a metric does not matter on apple devices especially when iphones and ipads are 120hz and testufo shows 60.
Yeah they didn't fix the bug. Unbelievable. It makes apple music almost unusable. Guessing it might just be a bug for people who download their own music.Strange that they'd release a 12.2 minor release instead of a 12.1.X bugfix release.
What I don't understand is why AppKit and not SwiftUI? Seems like Apple's been pushing SwiftUI, partially because of how it helps simplify porting between macOS, iOS, and iPadOS. However, I've heard that SwiftUI just calls AppKit/UIKit, and AppKit has features that SwiftUI. I'm not much of a developer, so I'm not sure.Should come with the AppKit version of Apple Music
Thats normal. The difference between 21D48 and 21D49 is just a public release. For M1 base computers you have the same System Firmware 7429.81.3I've got 12.2 RC build 21D48 and no update showing here.
Yes, it never gets boring being a beta tester.Thats normal. The difference between 21D48 and 21D49 is just a public release. For M1 base computers you have the same System Firmware 7429.81.3
Probably early next week you'll see the first beta for the next version.![]()
There is no change from last year. These current releases incorporating improvements (native Apple Music) bug fixes, are always 12.1 to 12.2. A last minute change can result in something like 12.0 becoming 12.0.1.If this his just a bugfix release, I really wish it would have been called 12.1.1. I like X.Y.Z version numbering where X upgrades are a major overhaul of the entire app/OS (like Mac OS 7 > 8, 8 > X). Y upgrades are many new features, but still fairly much the same (like many of the Mac OS X releases). Z updates are just bug fix releases.
Yes of course, in fact once broken, forcing it to reindex by re-adding/removing folders does nothing sadly, thanks though. It only fixes when rebooting and after a few hours of usage it breaks again.
I would love to try it if they would get my 14 MBP here sometime soon.Now you can try the MacOS 12.2 (21D49) and see if it fixed what you didn't like. For me this release is very stable.
Comparably this 12.2 beta cycle only had a single RC compared to last year's Big Sur 11.2 with three RC releases.![]()
Can you please let us know what is the Music app exact version with this release? I’m wondering if it’s the same as in the RC.searching artists with music app is a lot faster im happy, before I had to click it twice to search