Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So, what speed would your processor have to be now in order to notice a nice difference in an upgrade to the 3.06 GHz?
 
let me see Battery is Battery eventually they will die out and you need to charge them back but the old MBP15 is user replacable but the new one is not so whenever they claim that their battery last 8hrs or up to 5 years it really depends how the user use and abuse the battery. But at least I can change my own battery. 500gb of hard drive no fancy in there either unless its a 500gb ssd but its a 5400 500gb hardrive.

you're absolutely right. and i've just found out about the replaceable battery.
i will also overlook the 0.13 difference in GHz.
as for the larger hard drive, i don't know what difference that makes, and you seem to know better than i do, so i'll take your word for it :)
i consider myself lucky having been able to own the "limited" version, so to speak, albeit i could have saved $ on the new 15".
 
now has just 1 firewire slot and no way possible to expand that now.

There's absolutely no advantage to having two ports, since they are both on the same bus. You get the exact same result as daisy chaining or using a FW bus. And I don't think any mac, including the mac pro, has ever had more than one FW bus.

Thanks but, you can not daisy chain video devices. The camera (or deck) and the drives must be on separate busses. You will get dropouts and video underruns if the video signal goes through another device on the way to the computer for encoding/writing. This is nothing new, and apple should be well aware of it.

In which case, having a second FW port would provide absolutely no advantage since they are on the same bus.

What's the big advantage of watching a BR on a 15" laptop?

The advantage is if you own a movie on BR, you can actually watch it. Without a BR player, you have to rip it, download it, or otherwise buy it again in some other format.
 
There's absolutely no advantage to having two ports, since they are both on the same bus. You get the exact same result as daisy chaining or using a FW bus. And I don't think any mac, including the mac pro, has ever had more than one FW bus.

I'm sure most clued up users here are aware of this which is why they'll be miffed at losing the express card slot for a pointless SD slot (WTF), and after all if you need more firewire buses on the mac pro you can grab a cheap PCIe card.

I used to have this crazy idea that part of the Pro models appeal was that it was expandable within reason, maybe it was just me.

P.S. Although daisy chaining should work 100%, some devices just plain don't like it, one of them reasons why having more than one port can be a godsend.
 
Perhaps because we are (were) traditionally Apple's core market?

Or because it doesn't make much sense for Apple to screw us over and save (maybe) $5 per machine?

video/graphic is still part of apple core customer but in a marketing and business perspective why just sell to a niche market of just video/graphic pros which will sell a set number while they can also sell to the rest of the market where the majority of people are. They still have pros need in mind and know that those target audience will always come back to apple.
 
video/graphic is still part of apple core customer but in a marketing and business perspective why just sell to a niche market of just video/graphic pros which will sell a set number while they can also sell to the rest of the market where the majority of people are. They still have pros need in mind and know that those target audience will always come back to apple.

I'd agree with that if it wasn't for the fact that Apple no longer sell a "Pro" portable notebook.
 
Did you read my WHOLE post? It's not a space issue...

"The audio app & the audio project need to be on separate drives for best performance, and besides, audio/video work is HARD on drives... it is easier to format/replace external drives than internal ones."

And you managed to trim off my comments about memory space being a coupled factor. Did you read that? Your best performance rule of thumb is enabled by separating them why? You still haven't gotten to the why, you simply proclaimed a methodology but still haven't outlined what the fundalmental primary forces are.


That recommendation to separate is very likely based on old hardware and constraints. This is new hardware and looser constraints on the non-disk components (in addition to the disk components.)

For the application itself, once you have poked at the basic features you will be using the whole app should be in memory (unless you have given that a small budget). Likewise with GBs of application memory scratch space you won't hit the disk from that either. You have a point if the app is going to drag in GBs of application library data while editing but besides that where is the heavy disk pressure coming from your app? In the past when memories were smaller, the hard drive bus speed was 1/2 as fast on a laptop, 1/2 as many cores, and a few other constraints. I can see the app tapping the disk for code and/or libraries much more often so would have a recommendation to separate them (data and app disk).

Likewise if inbound streams of both audio and video and outbound to two/three disks at the same time, can see you have will run into constraints. However, suspect there are far more people who aren't cramming a MacPro worth of work into a laptop.

Recording isn't too hard on disks if there isn't much else going on with the disk. Most of that should be a set of sequential writes if the app/OS code is doing the job sensibly. Doing a bunch of non linear edits from 2-3 sources which writes a new stream of data will be. How many people do both concurrently if on a tight budget on a laptop?

What trying to get at is that folks may be looking at fixed workflows and/or methodologies that were formulated under different constraints. Yes the ExpressCard gives you more flexibility. Need an external RAID drive array? Sure, can see that too gets blocked. But before folks declare it is impossible to do, should at least be able to outline what is driving that as opposed to I can't used what I used in the past. New tech comes along and often there are viable substitutes. You'll never see them if constantly look in the rearview mirror.
 
it's pretty simple to me, in typical apple fashion, they are forcing users to move upwards. first with the matte option and now the expresscard slot, expect a lot more 17" MBPs in the field from now on.

'Pro' is just marketing speak, don't get hung up on it. only idiots buy a computer because it has a word in it's name. you buy what you need and apple has always done its best to make you buy the most expensive model, they're just taking it to the next level.

portability by damned.
 
it's pretty simple to me, in typical apple fashion, they are forcing users to move upwards. first with the matte option and now the expresscard slot, expect a lot more 17" MBPs in the field from now on.

'Pro' is just marketing speak, don't get hung up on it. only idiots buy a computer because it has a word in it's name. you buy what you need and apple has always done its best to make you buy the most expensive model, they're just taking it to the next level.

portability by damned.

Thats true the reason I bought macbook pro because of Firewire and expresscard. But if that avail on macbook 13 inch I should got the 13inch instead
 
uhh...so maybe next time around for the matte option. I can hold on for a year or 2. I got Applecare for another year. :)
 
And you managed to trim off my comments about memory space being a coupled factor. Did you read that? Your best performance rule of thumb is enabled by separating them why? You still haven't gotten to the why, you simply proclaimed a methodology but still haven't outlined what the fundalmental primary forces are.


That recommendation to separate is very likely based on old hardware and constraints. This is new hardware and looser constraints on the non-disk components (in addition to the disk components.)

For the application itself, once you have poked at the basic features you will be using the whole app should be in memory (unless you have given that a small budget). Likewise with GBs of application memory scratch space you won't hit the disk from that either. You have a point if the app is going to drag in GBs of application library data while editing but besides that where is the heavy disk pressure coming from your app? In the past when memories were smaller, the hard drive bus speed was 1/2 as fast on a laptop, 1/2 as many cores, and a few other constraints. I can see the app tapping the disk for code and/or libraries much more often so would have a recommendation to separate them (data and app disk).

Likewise if inbound streams of both audio and video and outbound to two/three disks at the same time, can see you have will run into constraints. However, suspect there are far more people who aren't cramming a MacPro worth of work into a laptop.

Recording isn't too hard on disks if there isn't much else going on with the disk. Most of that should be a set of sequential writes if the app/OS code is doing the job sensibly. Doing a bunch of non linear edits from 2-3 sources which writes a new stream of data will be. How many people do both concurrently if on a tight budget on a laptop?

What trying to get at is that folks may be looking at fixed workflows and/or methodologies that were formulated under different constraints. Yes the ExpressCard gives you more flexibility. Need an external RAID drive array? Sure, can see that too gets blocked. But before folks declare it is impossible to do, should at least be able to outline what is driving that as opposed to I can't used what I used in the past. New tech comes along and often there are viable substitutes. You'll never see them if constantly look in the rearview mirror.


Look man, we're not making this up. You can't keep your source footage (video or audio) on the same drive you are running the program on. Yes it's an old workflow but it still is true. I had this happen recently on a new mac pro (purchased in jan 09). Whenever an intern, or (assistant editor in this case) has a timeline in Final cut crap out and drop frames on the same clip, 90% of the time the problem is the clip is on the same drive the program is on. Simply moving it to a different drive corrects the problem. Now I can not tell you the technical reasons why (just the basic reasons) but it does happen. If you want a tech reason, then I suggest you look at the forum (and articles) at creativecow.com or dviinfo.com. There are many guys over there that can explain it better than me. All I can say is what my "real world" experience is, and that is it does not work.

It is also a size issue for me, I have a drive that has over 700gb of footage just for 1 project.
 
I must admit when i first saw that the new MBP's were out my heart sank a bit but to be frank I actually am quite happy now. As someone here posted i almost feel that those of us with the last gen MBP almost have 'special editions' i would hate to have SD instead of Expresscard and price wise - in the uk at least - i have not done too badly :)
And thanks god I have a user replaceable batery. I have 3 on the go as i am frequently away from power points and i would hat to have 7 hours and then i am all out I can go for about 13 hours before I run out :D
I feel quite sorry for those that lost out though.
- seems like being an early adopter has actually paid off for once :D
must admit i do like the idea of 3.06 GHZ :D
 
Apple really missed the mark by dropping the ExpressCard slot.
In Europe, lots of users connect to the internet using a wireless 3G Express card as their ONLY means to connect to the internet -- there is no home DSL, WiFi, or other internet around for many people.

Furthermore, while the latest 3G wireless devices come in the form of USB sticks, most people are locked into 2-year agreements using their 3G ExpressCards before they are eligible to upgrade to a 3G USB stick.

Hence, just for simple internet access an ExpressCard slot is absolutely required for a huge number of people across Europe. Dropping the slot now is completely unacceptable and will cost Apple dearly since their MBPs are not a viable option for most everyone in Europe anymore.
 
17" rules now

Ok so it's bigger than the 15", but let's be realistic here, we are talking 1.1" wider, .75" deeper and a little more than a pound more. It's the same weight as my old PowerBook G3!

To me having 1900x1200 screen res allows more room for pallets and tools in programs I use as well as being able to see larger photos. There is 25% more space on both the horizontal and vertical edges.

And it still has the express slot and is now $300 cheaper than yesterday!
So why is everyone not jumping up and down over this?

Do you think the 2.8ghz 15" ($2299) is going to be better/faster than the 2.8ghz 17" ($2499)???
 
Express Card slot

There are a lot of people i know who NEED an express card slot and they all use their macbook pros for professional audio applications. I was planning on buying one of the new MBP 15" models. but now I can't. Apple has lost me as a new buyer - sadly, I'm sure they don't really care.
 
Ok so it's bigger than the 15", but let's be realistic here, we are talking 1.1" wider, .75" deeper and a little more than a pound more. It's the same weight as my old PowerBook G3!

To me having 1900x1200 screen res allows more room for pallets and tools in programs I use as well as being able to see larger photos. There is 25% more space on both the horizontal and vertical edges.

And it still has the express slot and is now $300 cheaper than yesterday!
So why is everyone not jumping up and down over this?

Do you think the 2.8ghz 15" ($2299) is going to be better/faster than the 2.8ghz 17" ($2499)???

because that thing is massive. :D
 
Thank you for speaking for those of us that want Blu-Ray support! I don't have time to write this all out. It should at least be an option. If licensing is an issue, then charge a premium for those that want it. I'd pay it. Otherwise, I'm not buying a Mac again.

I don't really have the time to be posting here. But I can't help.



Well, blu-ray is better on any high definition display. As I've said many times, blu-ray downsampled on a small screen will look better than DVD upscaled by 2.5x (1280x800 screen). It's all about quality and not having to worry about having multiple copies of a movie. Why should I have to buy the blu-ray, plus the DVD, plus the "digital download"? One blu-ray disc should be all I need.

Plus a lot of us use our computers for work AND play. At the end of the day, its nice being able to connect my PC to my home theater set up with one cable and having it do all of my games, movies, etc.



Completely false. If you do some googling you'll see that blu-ray is being adopted at TWICE the rate DVD was at the same point in its life. If you look back 10 years ago, DVD only had 4% marketshare. Blu-ray currently stands at 8-10% depending on which source you read.

Blu-ray is definitely being adopted faster than DVD and that is a fact. This whole nonsense about blu-ray not selling well is just that, nonsense.



And how do you speak for the entire general population?

Blu-ray is already becoming mainstream in notebook PCs and its appearing in cheaper desktops, not pricey as you say. There are several PC notebooks well under $1,000 that offer blu-ray and the GPUs capable of playing back video. They also have HDMI outputs with the ability to push 8 channel LPCM out over HDMI.

And, again, blu-ray is becoming mainstream in notebooks. HP even offers a 13.3" system with blu-ray as an option.



And despite what those articles say, blu-ray is being adopted at twice the rate DVD was. Again, do some research. You'll see that blu-ray, compared to DVD at the same point in DVDs lifespan, is outpacing DVD adoption by more than double.



Wow, if you think that, then theres something wrong with your setup. Let's look at the facts here. Blu-ray has a native resolution of about 2 million pixels. DVD is just over 300,000 pixels. DVD's use MPEG-2 video encoded at an average bitrate of about 5Mbps. Older blu-rays use MPEG-2 at around 20Mbps, but modern blu-rays from about 2007 and on use H.264 or VC-1 encoded anywhere from 20-45Mbps.

Even when comparing the old MPEG-2 blu-ray discs to DVD, theres just no comparison. You're getting 3-4 times the bitrate and 6 times the resolution. More pixels with a higher bitrate will always look better.



Its actually quite funny you mention those two.

MiniDisc was quite popular in Asia. Very popular in fact, selling tens of millions. Beta was the defacto standard for professional video tape for many years after it lost the consumer market.

In the end, those two formats were very successful.

And, again, blu-ray is outpacing DVD growth by more than double.
 
Really Now?

I found this out the hard way. My wife got a 17" MBP matte option machine on Saturday and Apple dropped this bomb today.

It's not so much about the $300 price match, I expected they would do that. It's the fact that the new machine has substantially better specs. If you had configured a CTO 17" MBP yesterday with faster CPU and hard disk options it would have cost an extra $250 (it would have cost over $3100). Now this happens. Apple needs to do something extra for those of us who missed out on substantially better MBP machines (the extra hard disk space especially would be useful).

I have asked my local retail store where we bought it to not only credit us the $300 but also to throw in something extra, otherwise we might consider returning the machine we got and getting one of the new higher spec ones.

Also, the retail store was angry and flustered about not having the means to do the price fixes. Lots and lots of angry customers there wanting to know how long they were going to have to wait to get a credit.

I mean come one. Who goes out and buys a computer the day before a potential release. You can't get upset with Apple, you should have waited. How is a company supposed to operate if their customers expect them to always give them a deal after the fact? Would you buy a TV from Besy Buy on a saturday?? NO, you would wait 1 day, and see fi it goes on sale on Sunday. If you bought a macbook on sat, than thats your problem. Apple doens't owe you anythgin, so you should be happy that you are even getting a discount. Anger toward them si silly, you should be HAPPY that you are getting a discount. Buyer Beware
 
There are a lot of people i know who NEED an express card slot and they all use their macbook pros for professional audio applications. I was planning on buying one of the new MBP 15" models. but now I can't. Apple has lost me as a new buyer - sadly, I'm sure they don't really care.

Well although I want a 3/4 expresscard, I prefer a $300 price drop, in addition to a free ipod, and a printer rebate, I am saving hundreds! BluRay would be amazing, but not a deal breaker. I am not upset at all.
Upgraded screen, integrated 7hr battery, official 8GB RAM support, firewire 800 return!!! All good things.

I only have 2 USBs now and thats always been enough. I've never needed a an epresscard, but itd be nice to use with esata, althoguh at least i have firewire 800 now.
 
Lack of Express Card slot is a HUGE slap to Apples own community of Final Cut and Logic users. Not to mention the MANY other uses and users of Express Card peripherals. Glad I have a 15er with it. Its a collectors item now!!!

I understand the 13in not having it but dropping it from the 15's is a JOKE! A SD card reader is a simple thing to add with a peripheral! via Express Card, USB.

Not worthy of the Pro in the name at all! ITS A JOKE!
 
I mean come one. Who goes out and buys a computer the day before a potential release. You can't get upset with Apple, you should have waited. How is a company supposed to operate if their customers expect them to always give them a deal after the fact? Would you buy a TV from Besy Buy on a saturday?? NO, you would wait 1 day, and see fi it goes on sale on Sunday. If you bought a macbook on sat, than thats your problem. Apple doens't owe you anythgin, so you should be happy that you are even getting a discount. Anger toward them si silly, you should be HAPPY that you are getting a discount. Buyer Beware

well, a lot of us who bought the 17" MBP now had no clue that the 17" would be refreshed. Let's be honest here: the 17" MBP came out only a few months ago! Who would have expected that to have been refreshed? I did my research before buying and there were no hints, especially since the update was minor. Apple employees in the stores have had a hard time dealing with this too, because usually they would know if a refresh would come. This whole new MBP line screwed up everybody and screwed over buyers! The MB Unibody and the MBP 15" were due for refreshes, but the 17" was a gigantic bomb.

Looking on the bright side though, the difference between say a 2.93 GHz and a 3.06 GHz is pretty hard to tell. The hard drive size? Well, that would make me angry because I wanted the highest they got and that was 320 GB.

It's not a matter about being angry, it's a matter about people buying too early and getting screwed over by the WWDC because nobody expected the MBPs. Everyone expected iPhone 3GS, iPhone Software 3.0, and Snow Leopard. To me? It's whatever. I'm just going to call customer relations and ask them what they can do for me. Apple has been great with them for the longest time and I'm sure I'll be able to get compensation. I mean, I'm a college student. I need all the money I can get!
 
Meh, really minor upgrades in terms of cpu and a step backwards for losing that expressing card slot. Is it really that hard to have both?!

Anyway, does anyone know when the Core i7 will be available for laptops? That would be a worth upgrade.
 
Hi everyone, I bought a MBP 17'' 2.93 ghz on May 30 2009 and I received it last friday June 5 2009. I opened my Safari this evening and I saw on Macrumors that Apple have updated the new MacBook Pro 17'' to 3.06ghz with a better HDD than mine.. So I called Apple Care to have some explanations and to have the information to return my MBP because I want to have the updated one..but they charge me 10% of the cost of my MBP + the shipping fees or a 500$ credit ! I took the 500$ credit because I think that it was a good deal! tell me what you think about it!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.