Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah but being spoilt means they want everything, and the expess slot, and as card. And two fw, and usbs... We are talking about machines that are the pibnacle of technology, just the unibody alone is stunning. A couple of years ago we d have been stunned with so slim and super powerful machines...

And the graphics are just fine, the nvidia ones, they are super powerful, run cool and have shown 0 defects.

3/4 of the world and more have barely enough to survive, even drinkin water is a luxury to some, and here people complain about having to bring an extra cable along.

Get a grip people.

He/she went there...i don't think that was necessary.

Whats so wrong with wanting pro features on Apple's top of the line notebooks? This is a fantastic update for the average consumer and most of Apple's consumer base. But for me, no thanks. I am simply stuck with whatever Apple thinks is the best looking or what works the best for the average consumer. And personally the unibody stuff isn't that cool, its machined aluminum...and I think they are ugly.

But side note...I'm sure someone pointed it out, but the whole presentation was done from a machine with an old 20" ACD. I wonder why?
 
Three Times a Charm?

losing the express card slot in exchange for an SD card was just a dumb move. Most aircards use the express card slot, not to mention that slot is neater to use seeing as how the majority of the card tucks inside. Now, Apple is only leaving its customers the option of having to buy a USB aircard and take up 1 of its only two usb ports. Why is it that Apple can't just give people what they want?

It's great to see that they finally added an SD card slot (after a decade... way to be unfashionably late to the party, Apple), but it made no sense to add it in place of the Express Card slot.

They re-added firewire which is good and that along with the standard backlit keyboard I'm sure will piss off a ton of people who bought the last 13" unibody update model seeing as how you had to shell out upwards of $1600 for a backlit keyboard and now it's $1100.

Perhaps Apple will get Rev. C right?
Rev A - replace FW400 with FW800 but keep ExpressCard 34 slot
Rev B - Keep FW 800, but lose ExpressCard 34 slot
Rev C - keep FW800 or update to newer spec AND bring back EC 34 slot (I doubt there is any hope Apple will bring back FW400)

I could care less about the SD slot. Wal-Mart even sells an SD reader for $9.00 that plugs into the USB port on one end and the other end has a removable cap to reveal a slot for the SD(HC) card.

Unfortunately, I think others are correct. Apple is reserving one laptop for "pros" and otherwise has written off the community in favor of the younger generation.:(
 
We need a "Steve Jobs on Lack of Express Card in MacBook Pros" thread that goes on for months and months....

Exactly!!! This is a bigger issue than the lack of firewire on the original unibody macbooks for sure! We've gone from two machines being limited/eliminated to FIVE!!! And only one true PRO version out of 6 (portables).
Professional audio/video users...:apple:'s own Final Cut and Logic user base is affected. No it isn't all about audio/video users but it IS about :apple: supporting their software's end users.
Lack of SD never seriously affected the user base to warrant this change as there are a plethora of USB AND ExpressCard peripherals that inexpensively work for those users.
 
Wow. I couldn't agree more. This is a really sad direction for Apple to be taking. It seems like the focus in Cupertino has really shifted away from quality products and toward more market share and $$. This saddens me because I'm one of those loyal mac users who stuck with the company when their stock was worth less than $20 BECAUSE THEY MADE A BETTER PRODUCT.

I too hung with Mac because it was better.. who cares what the stock price of the company is? I'm not buying a VW over a Honda because the stock price of VW might be higher. Pick your tools because they are good tools. Not because the company is printing money in the basement, it is "hot", or other non tool factors. If the company doesn't have enough money to keep the doors open perhaps.

It's obvious why they've done this; they're following the same stupid formula as the rest of the industry: up the specs and lower the price, and your average stupid consumer (like the ones in the most recent misleading Microsoft commercials)

That's not what the Microsoft commercials nor the industry is doing.
The commercials are about there are a number of vendors offering a wide variety of solutions into several demographics. If you only have one hardware vendor you aren't going to get that kind of breadth of offerings.
If anything this move just reinforces those commercials they are not aligned with that message at all.

Different people have different needs.

As for the industry... errr how about the economy? When even had cash to burn folks would pay for stuff they probably won't use. Now, things are a bit different. Apple cannot float above and diverge from the average selling price of the market.


will find it more appealing. This is because all these shoppers typically do is look at numbers and assume that this equates with a better experience and greater longevity. This latest move by Apple is a clear example of why they're wrong; by dropping the ExpressCard capability and replaceable battery, they're effectively limiting the life and expandability of the machine. By making the battery irreplaceable

The battery isn't field replaceable. Neither is the screen. I could see if they didn't take any measures to increase the number of cycles the battery useful over, but they did. They also increased the amount of "on battery" time you have, by making it bigger. Every significant design decision comes with a trade-off. Most people want longer portable time out of their battery than a desire to have to do maintenance on it.

Similarly the trackpad is now also a button. So it has more failure modes than just a simple trackpad. It is a trade-off.


The hard drive thing, no easy field replaceable drives is a bit of a pain because hard drives wear out faster than batteries ( if truly mobile and doing stuff while in motion.). However, back in Powerbook era ... just as non field replaceable with few tools by the average user. So while not better, that largely been the case for a long time.



wouldn't be surprised if these things start selling like hot cakes over the next few months. In my opinion, it's like the Pontiac GTO of laptops; there won't be another one like it.

If they are so desirable why would people sell them?
Perhaps it retains its initial selling price longer than many other Macs... but sell fast?
 
http://catalog2.panasonic.com/webap...d=94262&catGroupId=34402&surfModel=AJ-PCS060G

P2 appears to be PCIMA cards [[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P2_(storage_media) ]. So can't directly plug them into express slots anyway. That should be a clue. Can't see why folks don't have relatively inexpensive FW800 devices that would take these (other than FW800 isn't popular or widespread. ;-) ) since you have to plug the card into something else before plugging that into the MacBook Pro anyway.

A bit forward looking, this might be one of the missing demand rivers for FW1600/3200. What have is HD content that must be transferred from one hard drive to another very quickly.

So yes, still looking for something that is express card native and a large set of MacBook Pro users.

SxS Cards: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XDCAM#Recording_media



I found this out the hard way. My wife got a 17" MBP matte option machine on Saturday and Apple dropped this bomb today.

It's not so much about the $300 price match, I expected they would do that. It's the fact that the new machine has substantially better specs. If you had configured a CTO 17" MBP yesterday with faster CPU and hard disk options it would have cost an extra $250 (it would have cost over $3100). Now this happens. Apple needs to do something extra for those of us who missed out on substantially better MBP machines (the extra hard disk space especially would be useful).

I have asked my local retail store where we bought it to not only credit us the $300 but also to throw in something extra, otherwise we might consider returning the machine we got and getting one of the new higher spec ones.

Also, the retail store was angry and flustered about not having the means to do the price fixes. Lots and lots of angry customers there wanting to know how long they were going to have to wait to get a credit.


There is no reason Apple should not be upgrading these laptops. I don't know if they are willing to price match, but they should absolutely exchange the computer for the newer, faster model. I purchased a Santa Rosa MBP 3 days before the Penryn MBP, and the Apple Store exchanged it for the equivalent (ie, entry level) model no questions asked. If the Apple Store won't exchange it definitely call customer service. Especially since the 17" is actually an upgrade. ;)
 
It is not a Pro

How can the baseline 15" be a considered a Pro?

I mean integrated graphics? Do I have that right?

What is going on with the Pro models?

For the evolution of Pro models - Do I have this right...

***We lost 1 FireWire port (We had a Firewire 400 and 800)

***We lost the option of a Matte screen

***We lost the express card capability and replaced it with a SD card reader?

***We lost the ability to carry/use an extra battery

***and for some models - we lost dedicated graphic cards

I like that there are new faster processors and they support up to 8 GB of ram, but why does Apple always seem to take a step forward and backward at the same time all the time?

***And where is blu-ray?!?!? When will I have the option?

***What ever happened to the year of HD that Steve Jobs promised?

!!We should expect Pro features for a Pro model? Especially, if we are paying the premium.!!
 
Ugh, what to do

I just ordered my 2.4ghz refurb MBP this week and still haven't received it in the mail. Now this messes with me. As a student, should I save an extra $170 (100 for the laptop, 70 for the RAM upgrade I bought), get the iPod that I didn't get before because I got a refurb, and opt for the updated baseline model (and just sacrifice dedicated graphics, as far as I can tell)? I don't know how important that extra two hours of battery is, and I don't really game so I don't think I'll need the dedicated graphics (though I'll be an engineer so I don't know if any professional apps will need dedicated?)... I haven't gotten the beast yet so I won't be charged restocking. Insights?
 
Nice, the Apple remote is an extra $19! I guess I'll hold onto mine from my black Macbook whenever I upgrade. :D
 
I would beg to differ. Just look at the huge beast of a laptop by Sager http://www.engadget.com/2009/06/08/sager-np9280-with-core-i7-and-triple-ssds-is-the-worlds-most-po/
Not the best looking out there, but it is using Intels new i7 cpu with 1GB of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M graphics, a 17.1-inch 1920x1200 display, express card slot, three different HDD slots, and up to 12gb of DDR3 ram.

And it costs $7,000. You think you might just be able to afford an Apple 17" alternative at that price? You can put the HDDs on the outside (where if you are going to subject them to tons of heavy workload they should be anyway.)

The mobile version of i7 class CPUs will be out late this year. The 17" Macbook will get one of those on the next revisions probably. And most intel desktops don't have i7 chips because most folks don't need one. They can get what they need cheaper.
 
The Apple store called me back. As I posted earlier today we bought my wife a 17" MBP on Saturday (just TWO days ago) and felt safe doing it because the 17" Unibody MBP JUST CAME OUT a few months ago and it seemed that there was no way it would get an update.

I had originally purchased the MBP for $2850 - 8% corporate discount. They told me that I only had two choices.

1. Return the one we bought for 10% restocking fee and buy the new one with the 8% discount from the $2499 price.

2. Take their "end of life" price on the one we bought but NO corporate discount. The end of life price was $2350.

Ultimately my wife decided to keep the one we bought but I'm pissed. I have bought end of life products from Apple before and my corp discount was still applied.

Does anyone have an exec email or contact number, because their going to get an ear full from me. If I had bought this MBP from Best Buy (where I also get a discount) they would have taken it back for a full refund with absolutely no questions, or, they gladly would have price matched me the full amount between the closeout price and still applied my discount.
 
Re: blu-ray is not mainstream, its useless, I dont use it, etc

Professionals use large data files for massive amounts of information and images and DO need blu ray. Also, some people DO own blu ray discs and may want to watch them on their computer sometime in their life, or rip them to watch on their phone (I, at least, tend to only own one copy of my movies). Not to mention BR sound is higher quality than ripped, if you own nice headphones. Further, some people may burn large media presentations, or HD video they made on their mac, and need to play is somewhere where theres no blu-ray player or HD tv. Whats the point of editing HD movies? What do I do, burn it to 40 DVDs? Hook my mac up to a TV? Keep tons of 40 gig files in a hard drive? hope it doesnt break/get lost...

re: MBP not just for A/V pros, others use it too, etc...

I'm an A/V hobbyist, and I also am one of the "other" professionals. Other "professionals" DO NOT really need a MBP. A lawyer, a doctor, a scientist doesnt need a macbook pro A macbook would serve EVERY need, honestly. They work with text files, and do some image editing and MAYBE some computer modeling. And in any case, they don't need to do modeling in the field, usually. It waits till they get back to the lab.

MBP has always been aimed at A/V professionals: video, photo, architecht, computer modeling. Always. MBPs without discrete graphics, with SD card slots (cause DSLR's use SD?), and without Blu-ray, AND without matte screens, is, frankly, bull (stars). Thats not a macbook pro. That's not a powerbook. Its a really awesome Macbook, which is fine. But after today, their are "fake MBPs" on the production line, including the 15 inch one, and the 17 inch is the only "pro" model. But it doesnt have blu-ray. Apple is diluting their brand and neglecting their core customers. If they want to sell laptops to college kids and hipsters and rich people, that's fine, hell, most of the people I know fall into those categories. But they are screwing their power users. I hope someone from Apple is reading this, cause you guys just screwed up for the first time, in a LONG time.

I was ready to drop some K's on a 17 inch with a 256 SSD if blu-ray came out. Guess not. Read the boards, people are PISSED the new ones are a step backward.
 
What about the old UMBP 17"?

Hi Fellow MacUsers,

I am a fairly new apple fanboy! I like, many of you, are dreading about the new uMBP 15" SD card slot.

I have waited a really long time to purchase my next MBP laptop (currently using MBA Rev A)

Because of the SD card slot on the new uMBP 15", I have decided to go with the uMBP 17". That being said, I wonder whether the new "upgrade" is worth the money. The Apple Store around my location told me today that they still have the old uMBP 17" and it is at a good price. I don't think the speed bump from 2.66 to 2.8 will change that much. I don't care much about the HDD from 320GB to 500GB because I can always put in a new one.

So my question is this,

1.Should I get the old uMBP 17" laptop? (that is, if they still have them left).
2. Matte or Glossy?

Thanks guys!
 
Wow, the only thing Apple didn't seem to flop on was Snow Leopard.

Phil: And now the MBPs are $300 dollars less.
Me: Oh, pretty sweet!
Phil: Pretty nice, eh? How about that.
Me: *sees baseline specs*
Me: *figures*
(a little later)
Me: How are these Pro machines?

Scott: And now the iPhone 3G |S| supports tethering and MMS w/ video!
Me: Finally! And pretty impressive too boot.
Scott: And all these carriers...
Me: *sees no AT&T logo*
Me: LOL, AT&T suckzors! Total fail.
 
I'm not trying to be an ass either but the post to which I was replying to stated it was practically impossible to get P2 card content to their laptop without an ExpressSlot ('...can only be read by an ExpressCard reader...' ). Expensive, yes. Impossible, no.

I figured the extra hop in workflow (in addition to expense) would be the real complaint as opposed to "can't be done". However, have a more substantive argument with Apple if it is "can't be done". (e.g., USB is too slow, too jacked up implementation of isochronous transfer , doesn't do target boot mode, etc. ).


Looked around a bit those solutions for P2 cards and saw that adapter. One of the adapters mentioned that a boot/reboot was necessary when insert the adapter card. P2 some cards seem to max out at 800 Mbps.
(http://www.panasonic.com/business/provideo/p2-hd/index.asp). Looks like newer ones that are in the 1.2 Mbps range though.

The costs that drive up those current panasonic solutions is that they are doing "too much" (a tv monitor, hard drive, etc. ) for your workflow. Really only need a box which knows enough to get the data off and drop the data onto a FW800/eSATA wire. Sure may not get the max 1.2 Mbps in the FW800 case but there are far more "pro" devices out there that will have one of those two interfaces going forward than the express card one.
Maybe cost a bit more than $100 but doesn't need to be in the $1000 range.

ExpressCard can do USB or PCI-e 1x. As much as there are ExpressCards doing USB like things (multiformat card readers, cellular 3G modems, etc.) that isn't a huge strong suit when there are two other USB sockets on the machine. So left with PCI tasks (or concurrent bandwidth with other buses). Apple doesn't want to do a PCI slot box in the sub $2000 range. They didn't on the desktop (no slots on desktop although the single processor Mac Pro probably should be down there.) and not doing it here either. In so far at the bottom end of the 15" MacBook Pro pushed several hundred below the $2000 range, the vast majority of folks buying on are going to be down there. That is what the specific unibody is aimed at because those are the folks who are mostly going to pay for it.

The adapter I normally use doesn’t need a reboot (it’s the Dual Systems one), and only cost $110 bucks. I think the “impossible to get p2 into a laptop” argument is really one that should be “I can’t get p2 media into the laptop within the normal budget” or at least as cost effectively (and light weight, those Panasonic readers do not fit into my laptop pack either). The way I see it, in these new updates Apple has made my (and many video production peoples) workflow harder, longer, and much more expensive.

The other Panasonic solution however aren’t really doing “too much”. They are just a different tool, for a different job. They’re made more for large productions that need a client monitor, and on location storage without a computer set up (small crew for instance, or just a big budget). Panasonic will never release an adapter (I don’t think) since they got burned on the whole PCMCIA mess (the cards where meant to fit right into the slot, then 6 month latter Apple went to express slots), and they can demand more money now.

I did mention the “extra hop” in workflow, but I think I got sidetracked with the budget. But yes, that is also a problem since now there is an extra “copy step” in the process and that can take too much time on a hurried shoot. If the crew is spitting out long takes, the card reading, and copying can take longer than the shoot itself.

But I think my main gripe is (well now it is) is that the last few MacBook Pro updates have basically caused more problems, and expenses, than solutions for many people to use. Not a good idea for a product. I haven’t gotten one in a while, since each new one seems to limit more of my solutions for my clients than it does help me solve their problems. If I get a new machine, I can no longer go into a shoot, or client meeting, and go “O.K. P2, I got the adapter right here in my bag”, or “so the client showed up with esata drive, no problem, I got the adapter right here”. Hell I have a shoot next week, that I need to take a DVCPRO50 HD signal fire wire from the camera, to a fire wire drive array (it may even be esata), and no matter what the specs say, you can’t daisy chain the camera thru the drives into Final Cut. So the new machine can’t do that job. My own camera (JVC-HD110) will not digitize if daisy chained thru the drive. But works just fine if the drives are on the express card.

Now I understand that most people are buying on the low end, but that’s not the “pro” market. If they want to make a computer for their “pro” users (Final Cut, Logic, ect) then make a computer that we can use!
 
The Apple store called me back. As I posted earlier today we bought my wife a 17" MBP on Saturday (just TWO days ago) and felt safe doing it because the 17" Unibody MBP JUST CAME OUT a few months ago and it seemed that there was no way it would get an update.

I had originally purchased the MBP for $2850 - 8% corporate discount. They told me that I only had two choices.

1. Return the one we bought for 10% restocking fee and buy the new one with the 8% discount from the $2499 price.

2. Take their "end of life" price on the one we bought but NO corporate discount. The end of life price was $2350.

Ultimately my wife decided to keep the one we bought but I'm pissed. I have bought end of life products from Apple before and my corp discount was still applied.

Does anyone have an exec email or contact number, because their going to get an ear full from me. If I had bought this MBP from Best Buy (where I also get a discount) they would have taken it back for a full refund with absolutely no questions, or, they gladly would have price matched me the full amount between the closeout price and still applied my discount.

Don't call the store, call 1 800 APL CARE. They might reason something different.
 
I'm bummed about them losing the Express Card slot too. I'm going to try to pick up one of the "old" models before they leave the stores.

Although, I called my Mac Store and they said they were going to be selling the old models for the same prices they were yesterday. Ie an "old" 15" MBP for $2,499 vs the "new" MBP similarly equipped for $1,999.

What the hell, Apple?

you may have better luck at places like macmall or macconnection, or the education outlets like your local college. they would have the blowout units and refurbished models. which could be had at a much better of a price than the apple store.
 
Ok I went through as many pages as I could and didn't see anything, but this thread is huge. My question is:

If I am interested in the new 15" updated mbps, I would do the 2.86 ghz upgraded option, which comes with the 500 gb HD. How come they do not offer it in 7200 rpm? Does it make that much of a difference?" whats the best option, to get that and order the 7200 that is included in the 17" and swap it out? Seems expensive..
 
Don't call the store, call 1 800 APL CARE. They might reason something different.

I did call them and after waiting eons to finally get through they insisted that there was absolutely nothing they could do for me, that I had to deal with the retail store.
 
Is 3.06GHz worth the upgrade ?

I've asked about the 3.06 processor and whether or not it's noticeably faster than the 2.8. No answer yet. I work on big RAW files in Photoshop.
The 500GHz drive IS available in 7200 rpm. in either processor.

Ok I went through as many pages as I could and didn't see anything, but this thread is huge. My question is:

If I am interested in the new 15" updated mbps, I would do the 2.86 ghz upgraded option, which comes with the 500 gb HD. How come they do not offer it in 7200 rpm? Does it make that much of a difference?" whats the best option, to get that and order the 7200 that is included in the 17" and swap it out? Seems expensive..
 
I've asked about the 3.06 processor and whether or not it's noticeably faster than the 2.8. No answer yet. I work on big RAW files in Photoshop.
The 500GHz drive IS available in 7200 rpm. in either processor.

noticably?? no. faster? DEF! you would see anywhere from a 5sec-20sec increase in processing times (depending on what you do). startup-times & app startup times wouldnt really be any different.

there is a 500GB (GB not GHz lol) 7200RPM option. :)

the biggest upgrade you would need would be RAM, esp if you are working with large RAW files :)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.