Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just watched that video. Turns out you can't go back a song? Nah. Think I'll definitely stick with my 2G Shuffle and might even order a new one just incase mine breaks.
 
I love how you now can't use any other headphones that don't have a controller on them.

Not far off the iPod flee spoof now :p

No kidding. I'm kind of a fan of shuffles (even though I've killed 2 via water damage from rain and sweat), but this is just silly.

I don't understand why having buttons on the thing was such an inconvenience. You can clip it anywhere and it weighs like 5 grams, why do you need a separate controller?

Also, like you said: when the headphones break, you have to replace them with Apple headphones.

I hate how Apple is shifting towards proprietary/hard to replace junk... well I guess they've been that way before and are just moving back to it.

I like the price-point and added space though. Too bad I can't buy one.
 
I've just thought of a reason why the lack of controls could be a good thing. Say you're throwing a party and you've made a custom playlist for it... But during the party, impatient (drunk) people skip to the next song without asking anyone else, thus annoying people enjoying that song. Or you made the playlist, but someone goes and puts on a Green Day album instead. Now, you can just plug it into the stereo and say "Sorry, can't control it!"

You also can't play it.
 
Bummer about the headphones, but then I doubt 90%+ of the target market for the iPod Shuffle really care. Hopefully we'll see some third party phones with controls on.

As iPhone users, we've gotten used to Apple holding back a host of features that we should have had a year ago.
 
They were working on this long before he left ;)

haha I love how many people think tech development takes about a week,

"MAKE ME AN IPOD!"
*instant later*
"Here you are, sir."

I'm not surprised that it is smaller, but how much smaller does this thing need to be? Apple is going over the deep end when they go so small you need to have controls on the ear pieces and thus have to buy expensive ear pieces just to work the iPod.

That last design was their best yet.
 
I was totally sold until I realized I couldn't use my Vibe II's with it.

The product does make sense, but it demands third party earbud manufacturers update their lines to be compatible. Until then, I'll just stick with my old shuffle!
 
Looks nice, interesting concept, completely ruined by some of the worst buds on the market. I use Sennheiser IE8s, there is no way I could go back to the stock buds - Garbage in comparison - Actually anyone who likes the music is doing it an injustice by using the stock buds. Though for 90% of Apple buyers who use the stock buds this is probably a great idea.

The real insult is £19 for these headphones...

http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MB770G/A?fnode=MTY1NDA0Ng&mco=MjE0NDgxMg

For £19 you can get a set of headphone that will be twice as good as these :(
 
I actually wonder, is this because of Jobs absence, like so many us (myself included) are "wishing", or is this just a pathetic move that has been on the books for months???

Serious question? Of course they've planned this for many months. I think Jobs is as much behind this as anything else recently. I can't wait for him to leave. I think he came back at the right time and helped turn the company around and put them on the right track, but it's been hit or miss. They've moved from being a (slightly more expensive) general consumer oriented company to one that lives up to the worst stereotypes of being a fashion accessory for rich people.
 
Is Apple intentionally trying to be out of touch? Is there a MS or Dell mole working in the interior of the company trying to bring it down?
 
They were working on this long before he left ;)

Yes of course, a long with a dozens of others things that currently designed, developed, and not being released.

The NOT being released part is what Jobs was best at, and its how they maintain such integrity throughout the product line.
 
Looks cool, but what about the controls?!
Say you break your headphones after your warranty?
Besides the fact it doesn't have any controls, this is really neat and it just popped up out of no where!
 
Not with people who actually use the shuffle for it's best use....working out/running/biking/hiking. That requires headphones that actually stay in your ears while moving around. I clip mine on my shirt colar, stuff the wires under my shirt, good to go. It's easy to reach the controls.

So you are saying that the new Shuffle will flop because "people keep the headphone-wire under their shirt, not over it!"?

Like I said, the new Shuffle will be a huge hit.
 
Meh, no thanks. I've got two shuffles and a nano and I like that I can use other ear buds with them and they don't talk to me. STFUpod/MehShuffle.
 
This is not an MP3 player for people who need to use their $300 custom fit Shure ear buds.

No, but even a pair of $20 Sonys is a vast improvement over the stock Apple headphones

This is not an MP3 player for people who have other weird headphone requirements.

Like headphones that stay in, don't cause pain and don't sound like a 1970s transistor radio from East Germany.
 
Holy hell, the world's energy crisis would be over if someone figured out a way to harness all the nerd rage on the Mac Rumors forums whenever Apple announced a new product.

Say it with me: "Apple's lowest-end MP3 player is not targeted at the enthusiast market. There are thousands of other sub-$100 MP3 players. I can find one that fits my needs, whatever they may be!"

Just repeat that over and over, maybe eventually it will sink in.

This is not an MP3 player for people who need to use their $300 custom fit Shure ear buds.

This is not an MP3 player for people who have other weird headphone requirements.

This is not an MP3 player for people who require FLAC playback, a screen, the thought of a voice angers you, or any of the other ridiculous complaints in this thread.

I LOVE IT AND AGREE! What kind of weird alien ears do you people have that the ear buds won't fit? And as far as quality goes, you will NEVER find a pair of $30 headphones that sound as good as Apple's.

And really? You pay $100+ for your headphones, but you buy a shuffle?

My nephews both have iPods. They use the standard Apple headphones without any issues. I guess it's because they are not OLD and stuck in their ways.

I think it's a pretty innovative product and THAT'S HOW WE GOT THE IPOD IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!

If you really miss your controls on the device, Go Buy A Sony (Cassette) Walkman from E-Bay! Or How About a Cd Player that skips everytime you place a foot on the ground.

What did you people do before this stuff existed? Glossy Screens? I want my Matte Option....whine...whine....whine. Because those GLASS CRT's we used for 30 YEARS were Matte? NO THEY WERE GLOSSY, MADE OF GLASS!

Apple is not about choice. They don't want you to have a choice. They want you to use their products and theirs alone. And as long as the dictator continues to provide me with products that I LOVE, I am happy to stick with APPLE Products. Buy the $79 In-Ear if you want Better Headphones. They come with 3 different inserts to fit ALL of your Weird Ears!
 
I've just thought of a reason why the lack of controls could be a good thing. Say you're throwing a party and you've made a custom playlist for it... But during the party, impatient (drunk) people skip to the next song without asking anyone else, thus annoying people enjoying that song. Or you made the playlist, but someone goes and puts on a Green Day album instead. Now, you can just plug it into the stereo and say "Sorry, can't control it!"

Wow, it almost sounds like the iPod Shuffle is not the product you need if DJ-ing parties is how you use an MP3 player. Now, this might be some really advanced thinking here so try to stay with me on this... Maybe, I don't know, try shopping around for a different MP3 player?

You people are absolutely hilarious.
 
You could plug the headphone controllers into it to press play, then switch the jack to the one connected to the stereo.

Might not work. iPods usually stop playing when you remove the jack. Then when you plug them back in again ( or the jack to the stereo) you need to press play again.

Anyway I won't be getting one since the apple earphones don't sit in my ears well.
 
If anything, I'm thinking of upgrading my 3G iPod to the Classic. My 3G keeps locking up all the time.
 
It'll be sweet when its just headphones... tap the left bud to go back, right bud to go forwards, or something like that. I was waiting to get a shuffle for working out, so I'll probably get this.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.