Yet another bad move in Jobs absence. I'm keeping quite the log of stupid marketing decisions by Apple with Jobs not on board, and in a few short months, its already very discouraging.
They were working on this long before he left
Yet another bad move in Jobs absence. I'm keeping quite the log of stupid marketing decisions by Apple with Jobs not on board, and in a few short months, its already very discouraging.
that's the point.. who is it an mp3 player for?? no one will buy this.
I love how you now can't use any other headphones that don't have a controller on them.
Not far off the iPod flee spoof now![]()
I've just thought of a reason why the lack of controls could be a good thing. Say you're throwing a party and you've made a custom playlist for it... But during the party, impatient (drunk) people skip to the next song without asking anyone else, thus annoying people enjoying that song. Or you made the playlist, but someone goes and puts on a Green Day album instead. Now, you can just plug it into the stereo and say "Sorry, can't control it!"
Bummer about the headphones, but then I doubt 90%+ of the target market for the iPod Shuffle really care. Hopefully we'll see some third party phones with controls on.
They were working on this long before he left![]()
I actually wonder, is this because of Jobs absence, like so many us (myself included) are "wishing", or is this just a pathetic move that has been on the books for months???
You also can't play it.
They were working on this long before he left![]()
Not with people who actually use the shuffle for it's best use....working out/running/biking/hiking. That requires headphones that actually stay in your ears while moving around. I clip mine on my shirt colar, stuff the wires under my shirt, good to go. It's easy to reach the controls.
This is not an MP3 player for people who need to use their $300 custom fit Shure ear buds.
This is not an MP3 player for people who have other weird headphone requirements.
Holy hell, the world's energy crisis would be over if someone figured out a way to harness all the nerd rage on the Mac Rumors forums whenever Apple announced a new product.
Say it with me: "Apple's lowest-end MP3 player is not targeted at the enthusiast market. There are thousands of other sub-$100 MP3 players. I can find one that fits my needs, whatever they may be!"
Just repeat that over and over, maybe eventually it will sink in.
This is not an MP3 player for people who need to use their $300 custom fit Shure ear buds.
This is not an MP3 player for people who have other weird headphone requirements.
This is not an MP3 player for people who require FLAC playback, a screen, the thought of a voice angers you, or any of the other ridiculous complaints in this thread.
I've just thought of a reason why the lack of controls could be a good thing. Say you're throwing a party and you've made a custom playlist for it... But during the party, impatient (drunk) people skip to the next song without asking anyone else, thus annoying people enjoying that song. Or you made the playlist, but someone goes and puts on a Green Day album instead. Now, you can just plug it into the stereo and say "Sorry, can't control it!"
You could plug the headphone controllers into it to press play, then switch the jack to the one connected to the stereo.