The same people that wear trump “**** your Feelings” T-shirts clutch their pearls when a comedian or journalist tells the truth and takes the piss out of their idols. The whole snowflake thing, like the rest of their schtick, is pure projection.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Removes Five of Six Infowars Podcast Series From iTunes Directory
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
The same people that wear trump “**** your Feelings” T-shirts clutch their pearls when a comedian or journalist tells the truth and takes the piss out of their idols. The whole snowflake thing, like the rest of their schtick, is pure projection.
No im suggesting if we only have the mainstream medias agenda then we will all by the very nature of it, be biased.
Other than the fact that the MSM is multiple independent companies with thousands of different journalists. So attributing an agenda to them is just another conspiracy theory
You think anyone respects or understands what your idiot is doing? Destroying alliances and doing russia’s bidding are hardly nine dimensional chess.
Contra-theory: the orange idiot is in late stage neurosyphilis and has no idea where he is or what he is doing.
I think my theory fits the facts better - with the openly admitting collusion after year of lying about that meeting (adoption lol) being only the latest example. (I’ll throw in thinking that stealth jets are literally invisible, for fun).
None of this made any sense, and seems to eschew logic and reason. But it was a joy to read nonetheless.
Why do people like you think you are so smart to realize that people have biases. It’s like “wow did you realize people have differing ideas! Mind blowing!”. You will find that every person you meet will process new information through frameworks they have created based on their experience (bias). So if you roll up on me and tell me you have a unicorn in your garage, how should I handle that? In your world of blissful, non-bias, perhaps I would take your claim at face value. However, in reality, I would use the sum of my knowledge and experience (bias) to conclude that your claim was full of *********.
Is my bias against your claim wrong? Why or why not? If I judge you to be a bad personality, and I wrong to be biased against your ideas? Why or why not?
The MSM isn't one entity, it's made up of all views. Im curious as to how you group Jones who peddles gay frogs, aliens, lizard people and fake crisis actor conspiracies while trying to sell unregulated supplements in with the media? There is something very wrong with that type of comparison. And as you pointed out, Jones has his own agenda, why should we give his loony agenda a second thought?
When they are all pushing the same agenda you end up with a bias. Everyone sing the same song from the same song sheet.
What agenda would you like to hear from Alex Jones? He's admitted himself that he's a fraud.
For one he offers a different point of view on the same information. Number 2 he often reveals things years before the media reveal them because of agenda. This sort of information is needed and should be welcomed in a world full of deceit.
[doublepost=1533651293][/doublepost]
Just another point of view. Another way of looking at things. Thats a good start.
[doublepost=1533651338][/doublepost]
Nah its controlled content pushing agendas for financial gain.
A pov consisting of what? Do you watch action movies for a dose of evening news?
Dont see your point. There is more than one way of looking at a situation. Hence why the news and Alex Jones are often at odds. Its healthy to see this conflicting information so one can make up their mind to where the truth actually lies.
He has stated he is making it all up. That's not a different angle. That's not conflicting info. If I told you that your house were on fire, and you're sitting in it with no flames anywhere, do we just disagree on the temp or something?
He hasn't admitted he's making it ALL up.
Provide proof please, be sure its the ALL part. And straight from the horses mouth not some mainstream media with agenda outlet. Thanks.
You already know I'm going to link to the story in which his attorney stated he's playing a character. That's why you're setting up the goalposts as specifically as you are, and unless the phrase "I made all of it up" appears anywhere, you declare victory. or you'll insist the source is wrong. Or or or.
Listen, if you're already convinced that even some of the stuff he says is true, obviously there isn't a single thing I could offer that would sway you so what's the point? It's a known trait of conspiracy theorists that the more evidence provided that proves them wrong, they cling even tighter to their favored conspiracies.
Playing a character doesn't have to mean making it all up. You know this. It can just mean the delivery.
SMH
1. That doesn't refute what I said.
2. The MSM is made up of more that just television stations.
3. Your chart doesn't even include Fox.
Last edited:
Do you know what Apple is calling "hate speech"? Since you are sour on this "Jones Crap", and I know nothing much about them, I was just wondering if this was true hate speech, or one of this "It is hate because we disagree" hate speech. That would put a lot of this in context. Sorry if this was already posted.
Absolutely not!
1+1=2
I do not need to have someone push a different agenda 1+1=3, to recognize that 1+1=2
That reductive logic isn’t necessary at all. Just use the matter within your calvarium to navigate this world.
You are doing way too much. The world does not need people taking what Alex Jones says as factual. If so - money is a tool developed by the government to listen to your thoughts.
Send all of your money to the nearest charity for the homeless. Hurry. Time is of the essence.
SMH
1. That doesn't refute what I said.
2. The MSM is made up of more that just television stations.
3. Your chart doesn't even include Fox.
You didn't include a chart because you know when you went looking for information to disprove me you found a truth you don't want to admit haha Welcome to the real world.
[doublepost=1533654385][/doublepost]
Thus, you will never find in all nature two identical objects; in the natural order, therefore, two and two can never make four, for, to attain that result, we must combine units that are exactly alike, and you know that it is impossible to find two leaves alike on the same tree, or two identical individuals in the same species of tree.
That axiom of your numeration, false in visible nature, is false likewise in the invisible universe of your abstractions, where the same variety is found in your ideas, which are the objects of the visible world extended by their interrelations; indeed, the differences are more striking there than elsewhere - Honore de Balzac Seraphita
Your chart did not include Fox or CNN. And none of the print media or news agencies.
What are you talking about? Do you need a chart to know that Fox News is a television network or that the NY Times is part of the MSM?
What gets reported and how the article or story gets written depends on the journalist and whom the journalist works for. A journalist can not write articles that are not in the interests of the company policies or beliefs.