Their case is pretty clear and listed in their documentation for the App Store. Other than that, Apple doesn’t need to do anything.Apple needs to make its case clearer and louder. If Epic were to win, then all apps would be free, with in-app purchases and Apple gets nothing
Because that's not their whole intent. The idea is to have your own store, complete with the customer data that you want. The money from those data is way huge than some millions for lawsuits. I mean they are learning form the best, Tencent.Yeah. You know what the funny thing about all of this? Complaining about 30% yet spending millions for one lawsuit.
wtf is wrong with you that you don’t understand the concept of fair trade policies?
Apple let Amazon have their apps on the App Store and sell subscription through the Amazon web site exclusively.
So Epic is just looking for special treatment? No other store exists on iOS, so they just want to have special treatment then?The lawsuit isn't about Fortnight. It's about the Epic's own app store.
If you read the complaint, Epic is seeking to open their own app store on iOS and iPadOS devices called Epic Games Store. They are claiming that since Apple rejected this, they are being anti-competitive.
"Apple has enforced these restrictions against Epic. Epic approached Apple to request that Apple allow Epic to offer its Epic Games Store to Apple’s iOS users through the App Store and direct installation. Apple’s response was an unequivocal “no”." (page 22)
Today's stunt was undeniably staged, particularly since it coincides with Epic's offering of Troy: Total War (an Epic Games Store exclusive) free of charge for today only to help promote their nascent platform and Macs and PCs.
However, this doesn't detract from the idea that Apple is (quite clearly) violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, which Apple willingly subjected themselves to by creating and operating a marketplace. They've likely been in violation for the past 10 years, but nobody had the resources to mount a legal challenge. Just like the Browser Wars of the 1990s, the courts will likely give Apple the same options it gave Microsoft: Apples can remove themselves from the situation by shutting down the App Store and removing all third party apps from iOS and iPadOS, or they can allow alternative marketplaces and payment processes to exist on iOS and iPadOS to comply with the law. Simply put, if Apple doesn't want to play by the rules, it should exit the US market and enter new markets where US laws don't apply.
I think that’s the pointI'm not sure that this will help Apple's current App Store lawsuits...
They carved out exemptions for others. I have many apps where I pay for the service/content outside of the Apple store.
To name a few (looking at my iPhone now): Duo, 1Password, Netflix, NYT, Prime Video, Youtube, Bria, Logi Circle, Shadow...
Shadow is a particularly interesting one as I can run Steam games and Epic games on my iPad (with keyboard and mouse)
Also makes me wonder what happens with cross-platform multiplayer games? Are they banned on IOS? (obviously I don't play any)
Edit: Interesting discussion here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/27251
It can still be played on iOS and Android, too. I’d like to check their financials to see when is their slowest sales of the year (I’m guessing August-September) but, nahhhhNo big loss to Epic since it can still be played on other platforms. Apple has never been a relevant gaming platform anyway.
When you develop a program for Windows or Mac OS you do not pay Apple 30% of your business to be able to sell to those users.
The Apple and Google store is a way to MONOPOLIZE and force 3rd party developers to
That is exactly what Apple is doing, complete anticompetitive practice, by doing whatever they want.
And the issue is that there are no other options. Only other one is Google and they do the same.
What’s the problem with steam?Most companies are greedy then. I'd enjoy to know what you think of Steam.
So Epic is just looking for special treatment? No other store exists on iOS, so they just want to have special treatment then?
Apple is 100% in the wrong here and I hope they lose in court. Epic and the millions of other app developers pay for the app store in the form of the yearly developer program dues. It's time for the EU and other government agencies to put an end Apples draconian app store policies.
It's not special treatment, it's what the law requires. If Apple doesn't like US laws, it can cease operations in the US. What makes this so high stakes is that if Epic wins, it can open Apple up to felony charges per section 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust act.
So breaking a app agreement and your app getting removed is an abusive practice? Go ahead, try singing up for very common website builders/services and try to create adult content there. Your website will get taken down because it breaches your agreement. Do you also consider that an abusive practice?
Not 30% dude. Not 30%. That's just wrong.
I wonder how many iPhones fortnite shipped or rather how devices fortnite shippedBecause apps drive device sales?
Not really the same thing.
Better example: Car dealer sells you a car and in the fine print in the purchase agreement it says you will only fill up gasoline at that dealer chain with a 30% fee. Car has a locking gas cap and only the dealer has the key. If you tamper with the gas cap then the ECU will brick the car.
Three years later the car breaks down and when you return to the authorized dealer they tell you "I'm sorry this has a third party battery; it can't be repaired. We will give you a $200 discount off a new car..."
Yeah. You know what the funny thing about all of this? Complaining about 30% yet spending millions for one lawsuit.
Can anyone explain why apple gets all the hate for the 30% fee while google gets away without any criticism? Genuinely curious.
[automerge]1597358874[/automerge]
That is one of the strangest comparisons I’ve seen
macOS is very secure... why can’t they replicate that on iOS?
I think that’s the point
if Apple gets attacked by EU, US, Microsoft, Facebook, Spotify, Epic then they must be wrong. Right?
by the way I disagree with that notion and wish those companies recognized what harm can it bring to all of us using their devices
I have never heard of any law stating "Apple must allow third party stores on iOS".
I don’t want that to happen.Fortnight is not a store. It need not open itself up to sales because they built fortnight. Apple built the app store and the iPhone the problem that everyone is having is You own the phone and You should decide where you get your software from on a device You have paid for. Apple touts that they are for the consumers but that is obviously bullshiet. I side load all the time no issues. If apple actually wanted to all they need do is leverage gatekeeper for ios and anyone that wants to publish can publish and bad software can (bad meaning malware) be blocked its already been done for mac for years.
and being on the app store isnt what it used to be. So many pieces of Sheet hanging around or not been updated in 3-5 years and look horrible on new devices yet still take up space, there is no real curation.
Apple needs competition to do better another app store that would enable people to upgrade software or use crypto or anynumber of things apple wont do. Times have changed we dont NEED the app store as much as we used to.
macOS is very secure... why can’t they replicate that on iOS?