Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah. You know what the funny thing about all of this? Complaining about 30% yet spending millions for one lawsuit.
Because that's not their whole intent. The idea is to have your own store, complete with the customer data that you want. The money from those data is way huge than some millions for lawsuits. I mean they are learning form the best, Tencent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gregohb and PC_tech
wtf is wrong with you that you don’t understand the concept of fair trade policies?

Apple let Amazon have their apps on the App Store and sell subscription through the Amazon web site exclusively.

Honest question, could Fornite players not go through a web browser to buy bucks (or whatever they’re called) to use in the iOS game?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
The lawsuit isn't about Fortnight. It's about the Epic's own app store.

If you read the complaint, Epic is seeking to open their own app store on iOS and iPadOS devices called Epic Games Store. They are claiming that since Apple rejected this, they are being anti-competitive.

"Apple has enforced these restrictions against Epic. Epic approached Apple to request that Apple allow Epic to offer its Epic Games Store to Apple’s iOS users through the App Store and direct installation. Apple’s response was an unequivocal “no”." (page 22)

Today's stunt was undeniably staged, particularly since it coincides with Epic's offering of Troy: Total War (an Epic Games Store exclusive) free of charge for today only to help promote their nascent platform and Macs and PCs.

However, this doesn't detract from the idea that Apple is (quite clearly) violating the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, which Apple willingly subjected themselves to by creating and operating a marketplace. They've likely been in violation for the past 10 years, but nobody had the resources to mount a legal challenge. Just like the Browser Wars of the 1990s, the courts will likely give Apple the same options it gave Microsoft: Apples can remove themselves from the situation by shutting down the App Store and removing all third party apps from iOS and iPadOS, or they can allow alternative marketplaces and payment processes to exist on iOS and iPadOS to comply with the law. Simply put, if Apple doesn't want to play by the rules, it should exit the US market and enter new markets where US laws don't apply.
So Epic is just looking for special treatment? No other store exists on iOS, so they just want to have special treatment then?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
I'm not sure that this will help Apple's current App Store lawsuits...
I think that’s the point

if Apple gets attacked by EU, US, Microsoft, Facebook, Spotify, Epic then they must be wrong. Right?

by the way I disagree with that notion and wish those companies recognized what harm can it bring to all of us using their devices
 
They carved out exemptions for others. I have many apps where I pay for the service/content outside of the Apple store.

To name a few (looking at my iPhone now): Duo, 1Password, Netflix, NYT, Prime Video, Youtube, Bria, Logi Circle, Shadow...

Shadow is a particularly interesting one as I can run Steam games and Epic games on my iPad (with keyboard and mouse)

Also makes me wonder what happens with cross-platform multiplayer games? Are they banned on IOS? (obviously I don't play any)

Edit: Interesting discussion here: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/27251

I thought the issue wasn't that you can't pay for stuff outside of the App Store, its that you can't have a direct link to link you outside of the app and to a page where you can pay. From what I remember, with 1Password, you CAN pay in-app, or you can pay outside of it, but there is no link in the iOS app to take you to the page to pay. And with Netflix and Hulu, it tells you to go to the page to signup, but doesn't provide the link.
 
No big loss to Epic since it can still be played on other platforms. Apple has never been a relevant gaming platform anyway.
It can still be played on iOS and Android, too. I’d like to check their financials to see when is their slowest sales of the year (I’m guessing August-September) but, nahhhh :) This will all be over within a couple weeks when Epic uploads a compliant version of the game. The biggest downside for them will be that I‘m sure misbehaving companies apps are given more stringent review for awhile.
 
When you develop a program for Windows or Mac OS you do not pay Apple 30% of your business to be able to sell to those users.
The Apple and Google store is a way to MONOPOLIZE and force 3rd party developers to

That is exactly what Apple is doing, complete anticompetitive practice, by doing whatever they want.
And the issue is that there are no other options. Only other one is Google and they do the same.

Yes you do, IF you use the Microsoft Store or the App Store. Steam, Epic, Origin, and other stores take a cut. Microsoft and Apple's stores take 30% cut. If you use your OWN distribution platform, since its YOUR OWN, nothing gets taken out. Why is this difficult to understand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: hlfway2anywhere
So Epic is just looking for special treatment? No other store exists on iOS, so they just want to have special treatment then?

It's not special treatment, it's what the law requires. If Apple doesn't like US laws, it can cease operations in the US. What makes this so high stakes is that if Epic wins, it can open Apple up to felony charges per section 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust act.
 
Apple is 100% in the wrong here and I hope they lose in court. Epic and the millions of other app developers pay for the app store in the form of the yearly developer program dues. It's time for the EU and other government agencies to put an end Apples draconian app store policies.

Then this should be a global change. Stop Steam, Epic Game Store, Origin, Windows Store, macOS App Store, Google Play Store from charging fees per purchase too. Or do you just want this change only to Apple because its "cool" to bash Apple? If so, why does Android's Google Play store get a pass with its 30% cut too?
[automerge]1597363041[/automerge]
It's not special treatment, it's what the law requires. If Apple doesn't like US laws, it can cease operations in the US. What makes this so high stakes is that if Epic wins, it can open Apple up to felony charges per section 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust act.

I have never heard of any law stating "Apple must allow third party stores on iOS".
 
So breaking a app agreement and your app getting removed is an abusive practice? Go ahead, try singing up for very common website builders/services and try to create adult content there. Your website will get taken down because it breaches your agreement. Do you also consider that an abusive practice?

Not really the same thing.

Better example: Car dealer sells you a car and in the fine print in the purchase agreement it says you will only fill up gasoline at that dealer chain with a 30% fee. Car has a locking gas cap and only the dealer has the key. If you tamper with the gas cap then the ECU will brick the car.

Three years later the car breaks down and when you return to the authorized dealer they tell you "I'm sorry this has a third party battery; it can't be repaired. We will give you a $200 discount off a new car..."
 
Looks like Google and Apple are on the same side, when is the last time you saw that happen?

Google just booted them; play store like is Not Found.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anox
Not really the same thing.

Better example: Car dealer sells you a car and in the fine print in the purchase agreement it says you will only fill up gasoline at that dealer chain with a 30% fee. Car has a locking gas cap and only the dealer has the key. If you tamper with the gas cap then the ECU will brick the car.

Three years later the car breaks down and when you return to the authorized dealer they tell you "I'm sorry this has a third party battery; it can't be repaired. We will give you a $200 discount off a new car..."

Its exactly the same thing. In the agreement I said I agreed too said I cannot post content of types X Y Z, .... If I suddenly do so, I am in breach of that agreement. JUST like what happened here. Epic developers agreed that in app purchased would be used. They broke that agreement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1144557
Yeah. You know what the funny thing about all of this? Complaining about 30% yet spending millions for one lawsuit.

Which is worth it to Epic because they are undoubtedly paying Apple way more in IAP.

Epic clearly wanted to get kicked off the App Store, they got their wish.
 
Can anyone explain why apple gets all the hate for the 30% fee while google gets away without any criticism? Genuinely curious.
[automerge]1597358874[/automerge]


That is one of the strangest comparisons I’ve seen

Because its "cool" to hate on Apple. That is all. Really I do not understand this either. They turn a blind eye for Google, but mention Apple and OH BOY people start complaining like CRAZY. It makes ZERO sense.
 
macOS is very secure... why can’t they replicate that on iOS?

Because it’s not. Period.

It’s a radically different operating system. From it’s inception MacOS was built to be very open. iOS was designed with a totally different paradigm.

And MacOS isn’t “very secure”. One bad app can wreak havoc across the entire system. iOS was built to sandbox everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jole
I think that’s the point

if Apple gets attacked by EU, US, Microsoft, Facebook, Spotify, Epic then they must be wrong. Right?

by the way I disagree with that notion and wish those companies recognized what harm can it bring to all of us using their devices

It’s never been about right or wrong but about control and who ultimately ends up with it.
 
I have never heard of any law stating "Apple must allow third party stores on iOS".

It's called the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, and Apple/Google/Amazon etc have been flouting it for the better part of the last decade (hence the recent Congressional hearings). Essentially, if Apple wants to operate a store, that's fine, but it has to allow other stores (or another means to install software) on iOS/iPadOS too. Or, Apple can ditch the App Store and third party apps and the law will no longer apply.

The government used the same law against Microsoft in the late 1990s, when they only permitted Internet Explorer by default. It's a pretty powerful law that prevents any sort of monopolies within a marketplace (and I think we'd all agree that the App Store is a marketplace).
 
  • Like
Reactions: PC_tech and sigsegv
Fortnight is not a store. It need not open itself up to sales because they built fortnight. Apple built the app store and the iPhone the problem that everyone is having is You own the phone and You should decide where you get your software from on a device You have paid for. Apple touts that they are for the consumers but that is obviously bullshiet. I side load all the time no issues. If apple actually wanted to all they need do is leverage gatekeeper for ios and anyone that wants to publish can publish and bad software can (bad meaning malware) be blocked its already been done for mac for years.

and being on the app store isnt what it used to be. So many pieces of Sheet hanging around or not been updated in 3-5 years and look horrible on new devices yet still take up space, there is no real curation.

Apple needs competition to do better another app store that would enable people to upgrade software or use crypto or anynumber of things apple wont do. Times have changed we dont NEED the app store as much as we used to.
I don’t want that to happen.
don’t you have android for that?
I actually like that there’s one app source and less noise
 
macOS is very secure... why can’t they replicate that on iOS?

The very nature of allowing a user to download an app from a website, and launch it on their own is the definition of insecure. Download this update to your flash player that is 100% NOT from Adobe!
 
  • Like
Reactions: jinnj
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.