Epic Games. Sigh. So many hours and championships wasted playing the greatest competitive game of all-time: Unreal Tournament '99 CTF. Now they're some strange amalgam of Justin Bieber and Tencent.
As far as I understand it, Trump is the president of the USA, so his executive order can be binding to the US territory/companies, but how can this affect the Chinese software market?
Total non-suit. They signed / agreed to the App Store policy. Nothing to sue over.
True but for this anology to be correct you would have to say that walmart will stop U the consumer from purchasing from the manufacture directly say those airfrenshner refils u purcheed the base unit but u can only buy the refil from them and they will penalize the manufacturer from direct sales.While I agree with you, selling via third party is optional. You could in most cases go direct to the retailer. We the consumer/developer pay Apple to use the store (paid applications, or free) and then pay Apple for every in-game purchase. It's a bit much too be honest.
Fortnites skin bundles has gotten more expensive for less content, and they continue to reuse old skins and charge $15 to $20 bucks for this. The $10 dollar battle pass used to be worth it since you could buy the pass, save your v bucks from it for the next one, usually in 3 months. The new seasons have gone on for up to 6 months, encouraging kids to spend more money.
I’ve watched this. Kids bully other kids to buy the new hot skins. I’m Guessing my new phew has dropped at least $400 in fortnite skins over the last year. $10 dollars here, $20 there.
They know the game is going down hill, and this play was a way of drumming up headlines (and maybe more money) so that people will play again.
This isn’t them being the little guy (though compared to Apple everyone is).
It sounds like you're defending microtransactions as a beneficial business model and that consumers losing access to paying for those microtransactions is harmful to them (the consumers). Is that correct?Looks like Epic just showed all the antitrust regulators that Apples app store policies harm the consumer with regard to pricing.
Here’s a prediction then if you don’t get it.What a colorful and descriptive, yet completely meaningless analogy
Epic Games. Sigh. So many hours and championships wasted playing the greatest competitive game of all-time: Unreal Tournament '99 CTF. Now they're some strange amalgam of Justin Bieber and Tencent.
It sounds like you're defending microtransactions as a beneficial business model and that consumers losing access to paying for those microtransactions is harmful to them (the consumers). Is that correct?
Until apps leave the appstore so you don't have a choice.
True but for this anology to be correct you would have to say that walmart will stop U the consumer from purchasing from the manufacture directly say those airfrenshner refils u purcheed the base unit but u can only buy the refil from them and they will penalize the manufacturer from direct sales.
This is the digital future folks. Nothing out there is yours, and your access to it can just go away whenever the true owner feels like it. This isn’t just an Apple thing, this is your favorite movies, shows and music too. It just takes someone getting offended, worked up, or there’s a corporate pissing contest and the customer is the one who loses. Game studios can be the worst at this, making some games entirely unplayable after so many years. If you complain, they would just say that they own the content and you can go pound sand.