Or maybe they simply decided to get their OLED displays from the current market leader?Apple's pride
And rather than paying cash to Samsung, they can just avoid the penalty by making their tablets and computers use OLED
So we end up with inferior OLED (compared to Micro LED) because Tim over did the orders?
µLEDs are far from being marketable. You won't be seeing any commercially viable displays with that technology before next year and even then the prices will be absolutely prohibitive for computers, possibly even phones.Apple is better off going to microLED.
It depends a bit on the display content, but in general OLEDs are more energy efficient. The backlight in conventional LCDs is constantly lit and draws power, even if the display shows a completely black picture.Also this is the first I heard that OLED are more energy efficient than LEDs. Thought it was the other way around...
OLEDs only draw power when they are actually emitting light. An OLED display showing a black picture draws virtually no power at all.
OLED prices have dropped significantly in the last years. Quite a number of laptop manufacturers (Asus, Lenovo, Dell, Razer) are already offering laptops with OLED displays, or will be offering them later this year. These machines don't cost that much more than the models with LCDs.First MacBook Pro with a 5-digit price?